C556 351 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 ^^^This assumes that the sarin would have been stored in a binary state.It always has been before in Syria so that's a safe assumption to make, it's just the usual way of dealing with these agents.It is the sensible and safe way of handling these chemicals. Whether the rebels are followin' proper 'elf 'n' safety reg's is anyone's guess. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 ^^^This assumes that the sarin would have been stored in a binary state.It always has been before in Syria so that's a safe assumption to make, it's just the usual way of dealing with these agents.It is the sensible and safe way of handling these chemicals. Whether the rebels are followin' proper 'elf 'n' safety reg's is anyone's guess. It could be anyone or anything who knows what shady government agencies do and the reasons they do it. The only thing I'm certain about is that it wasn't anything to do with me or mine and me and mine have no need to feel guilty or suffer because of it. And why such an outrage anyhow what's the difference between dieing in a gas attack,getting burnt or crushed to death in a conventional attack or having your head chopped off the results the same your dead. Russia uk Syria USA China Iran isreal France Saudi, you name it the "leaders" of these countries and every other have plenty blood on their hands what difference does 72 more bodies make. The good people of Britain are guilt free and they are the only people I care about everyone else is someone elses problem Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted April 6, 2017 Report Share Posted April 6, 2017 Probably less likely to be the option Trump chooses: https://theintercept.com/2017/04/06/u-s-weighs-saturation-strike-on-syrian-government-in-response-to-chemical-attack/ Although: https://mobile.almasdarnews.com/article/us-warships-ready-launch-missiles-syrian-army-targets-given-order/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 Trump has bombed Syria, here we go... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 The Business Insider quoting experts on chemical weapons, at least I actually cite sources I haven't seen a single one from you Sounds like you're the one with a strongly held view looking for anything to confirm if for you pal. Personally I've got no real opinion one way or the other on Syria, both sides have committed their share of atrocities. I'm certainly not in favour of a Western lead invasion and rehashing of the last Iraq war over there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 Trump has bombed Syria, here we go... If the US has and the Russians didn't use the S-400 missiles to shoot down the missiles then it means there was some kind of deal with the Russians most likely over Ukraine Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) There was a much higher number of flights between Syria, Russia and Iran earlier, indicating they were either expecting, or had been forewarned of an attack. Hopefully only one strike and they're out. Edited April 7, 2017 by C556 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 The Business Insider quoting experts on chemical weapons, at least I actually cite sources I haven't seen a single one from you Sounds like you're the one with a strongly held view looking for anything to confirm if for you pal. Personally I've got no real opinion one way or the other on Syria, both sides have committed their share of atrocities. I'm certainly not in favour of a Western lead invasion and rehashing of the last Iraq war over there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html Link doesn't seem to lead to anything It's a conspiracy!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 The Business Insider quoting experts on chemical weapons, at least I actually cite sources I haven't seen a single one from you Sounds like you're the one with a strongly held view looking for anything to confirm if for you pal. Personally I've got no real opinion one way or the other on Syria, both sides have committed their share of atrocities. I'm certainly not in favour of a Western lead invasion and rehashing of the last Iraq war over there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html Link doesn't seem to lead to anything It's a conspiracy!! If you don't believe the government lie then you are an idiot We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington. We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record. Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion? Kind regards David Source http://web.archive.org/web/20130131042538/http://www.cyberwarnews.info/reports/a-look-into-the-britam-defence-data-leak-files/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 You're taking a while to answer Leftists/Corbyn supporters should be anti war? On Twitter all the lefties are screaming for war, the so called far right are fighting against it You couldn't make it up lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 Original article http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) "There can be no dispute that Syria used banned chemical weapons, violated its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and ignored the urging of the UN Security Council. Years of previous attempts at changing Assad's behavior have all failed and failed very dramatically." - Donald J. Trump He really is a very smart man you know, I don't think he'd fall for an obvious false flag attack Edited April 7, 2017 by BGD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 "There can be no dispute that Syria used banned chemical weapons, violated its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and ignored the urging of the UN Security Council. Years of previous attempts at changing Assad's behavior have all failed and failed very dramatically." - Donald J. Trump He really is a very smart man you know, I don't think he'd fall for an obvious false flag attack Ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop taking the spastic drug Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted April 7, 2017 Report Share Posted April 7, 2017 Can't disprove what I posted...as usual lol To normal people: The sad thing is we are all going to suffer from this situation, Trump appears to have been owned by the neocons/liberal interventionists/deeps state and the internet is on fire tonight over it|! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.