Gas Attack In Syria..genocide

[WILF 47,482]

Question, if a couple more gas attacks put a stop to this war once and for all would that be a good thing or a bad thing?

[kanny 20,703]

Question, if a couple more gas attacks put a stop to this war once and for all would that be a good thing or a bad thing?

It could be the lesser of two evils but I don't think you could ever say it was a good thing.

[DogMan85 722]

Question, if a couple more gas attacks put a stop to this war once and for all would that be a good thing or a bad thing?

Was Hiroshima a good or bad thing?

[BGD 6,436]

 

 

 

And that didn't work so send in the suidi jihadists to destabilise the area giving a excuse to put the foot in thedoor and divide a conquer ? ...I just think nothing should be took on face value in this whole mess ...it stinks

This happened after the "Saudi jihadists" had already been running wild and destabilising the country for years though?

Fact is if Obama had really wanted to invade Syria he had all the pretext he needed without inventing chemical weapon attacks.

Pretext perhaps.. support of the people I'm not sure after Iraq ...but hey throw a few chemical weapons about and people are foaming at the mouth to get the troops in....excuse the pun.

If you really believe, against all evidence, that the Obama administration deployed chemical weapons on Syrian civilians so they could use it as an excuse for an invasion that never happened then I don't know what to say really, that tinfoil hat is just too much for me.

[scothunter 12,609]

It shouldn't be used in any attack. I would condemn it even if my own country used them. Horrible way to wage a war.

[WILF 47,482]

It shouldn't be used in any attack. I would condemn it even if my own country used them. Horrible way to wage a war.

That wasn't the question though big lad ?

[scothunter 12,609]

 

Question, if a couple more gas attacks put a stop to this war once and for all would that be a good thing or a bad thing?

 

Was Hiroshima a good or bad thing?

good thing that ultimately saved our soldiers life. Horrendous that 300,000 mostly civillians were vaporised and many suffer today.

 

I like to think the intention was goos, but i suspect thar was an after thought.

They had this super weapon and the cost was huge. They just couldn't resist using it and letting the russians know "look what we have and not afraid to use it".

 

@wilf in my opinion NO. Nuke them if you're going to resort to that kind of warfare. Why let them die trying to draw a breath.

[TOMO 26,655]

them two bombs the yanks droped in ww2,,,,,they could have droped on an un inhabeted iseland or atol in the pacific,,to show the japs what they had

[WILF 47,482]

them two bombs the yanks droped in ww2,,,,,they could have droped on an un inhabeted iseland or atol in the pacific,,to show the japs what they had

Sensible comment that mate, id certainly never thought of it although like most really sensible stuff it's sounds obvious when you read it.

Well said old chap

[scothunter 12,609]

They needed to know what it actually could do to a populated city mate

 

totally making an island dissappear would certainly have got them thinking. Probably cause a Tsunami and wipe out a few cities anyway lol

[riohog 5,729]

them two bombs the yanks droped in ww2,,,,,they could have droped on an un inhabeted iseland or atol in the pacific,,to show the japs what they had

you can threten as much as you like but ultimatly they had to show them who was boss the yanks were very pissed off about the attack on pearl harbour

[kanny 20,703]

 

 

 

 

And that didn't work so send in the suidi jihadists to destabilise the area giving a excuse to put the foot in thedoor and divide a conquer ? ...I just think nothing should be took on face value in this whole mess ...it stinks

This happened after the "Saudi jihadists" had already been running wild and destabilising the country for years though?

Fact is if Obama had really wanted to invade Syria he had all the pretext he needed without inventing chemical weapon attacks.

Pretext perhaps.. support of the people I'm not sure after Iraq ...but hey throw a few chemical weapons about and people are foaming at the mouth to get the troops in....excuse the pun.

If you really believe, against all evidence, that the Obama administration deployed chemical weapons on Syrian civilians so they could use it as an excuse for an invasion that never happened then I don't know what to say really, that tinfoil hat is just too much for me.

if you really believe Assad would use chemical weapons on his own people at this stage of the game when the end and victory is in sight and the whole world's eyes are focused on him i think you should keep that hat on and expand your views maybe the people you think are good ain't as good as you think....it doesn't add up does it? lol...consider its a long game that's being played here drip drip drip the agenda into our heads until it becomes a good idea no matter how powerful these elite are there not as powerful as the people on mass who they need on side for there plans to work....maybe I'm being to speculative maybe your being to nieve lol I doubt we will ever know the truth as delswel says the truth was the first casualty.

[lurcherman 887 13,259]

If sadam and gadaffi ect were left alone this wouldnt be happening. They knew how to deal with these c**ts

[BGD 6,436]

Just standard conspiracy theorist patter, no real evidence just lots of theory with no substance.

 

I'll continue trusting UN and independent NGO investigations that have concluded without doubt that Assad has used chemical weapons rather than conspiracy theorists on the internet and Russian propaganda

[kanny 20,703]

Just standard conspiracy theorist patter, no real evidence just lots of theory with no substance.

I'll continue trusting UN and independent NGO investigations that have concluded without doubt that Assad has used chemical weapons rather than conspiracy theorists on the internet and Russian propaganda

You do that bud lol