Sent To Me By Craggers Off Here Today By Pm

[donnyc 1,203]

He has hasn't he?

No he has kept a line of borders for 70 years or is it russells now????? LOL

[Corkman 944]

My reply......
Sent Today, 04:48 PM
What you have is an imported fox regardless of any findings .If that exact script appears in edrd you are in breach of copywrite through thl .Few have been taken to court over it so think on .If you've 60 years of looking for a greyhound fox lol something tells me you ain't going to find one .DNA only tells its ancestry not what it looked like .
Lol,not lutra is it .

 

 

Why did you threaten legal action over a silly discussion? Do you have shares in or own THL? Surely free advertising is a good thing!

 

It would be interesting to know the other legal CW infringements cases just by chance one of the members inadvertently steps over the line...................... A few flat earth types on here that wouldn't realise they are doing wrong.

[Dead Eyes 681]

From a copyright point of view

 

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

 

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

 

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

 

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

[Phil Lloyd 10,738]

From a copyright point of view

 

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

 

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

 

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

 

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

Hi,.I would be keen to learn a wee bit more regarding the penalties for using another man's photographs,..the legalities, etc....

 

Many thanks, Phil.

[neil cooney 10,416]

[Corkman 944]

From a copyright point of view

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

LOL.... I might be hunted down by Disney?

[Rabbit Hunter 6,613]

Who cares

Finally some sense!!!!

[Dead Eyes 681]

 

From a copyright point of view

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

LOL.... I might be hunted down by Disney?

I didn't see your post but for non commercial use and/or especially as a parody then copyright law doesn't often come into it... unless we're talking piracy obviously

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Seems to be some very carefree people on here

[Dead Eyes 681]

 

 

From a copyright point of view

 

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

 

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

 

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

 

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

Hi,.I would be keen to learn a wee bit more regarding the penalties for using another man's photographs,..the legalities, etc....

 

Many thanks, Phil.

Has someone used your pictures for commercial gain?

 

In which case, you can literally send them an invoice and go the small claims court route if they don't pay

 

Under the Berne Convention, copyright is automatically held at the time of creation of an original artwork

 

Be careful how much you bill someone for though, as you may have to prove how you value a picture so high.

 

A good place to start is whatever Getty Images charge for use of their protected artwork - if it's a hunting scene then you can always add a percentage because of the legal controversy and potential associated hardships you endured to get the picture or to have the picture in the public domain

 

If the publisher in question disputes the amount then you can point out that your permission wasn't granted before the picture was used

[Rabbit Hunter 6,613]

Seems to be some very carefree people on here

Why don't you give us an idiots guide to what's going on FD? Because I honestly can't make any sense from the posts you put up?

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Right ,for you idiots lol,sorry if it makes no sense lads .The crux of it is I'm no fan of the original sender and know he hates contraversey ,preferring to put lads down publically through the pages of the mag with no right to reply that will be seen in print .

He pmd me what i posted and I just thought I'd pre empt the mag to show that I'm not in agreement of seeing it in print without my permission and restart the greyhound fox debate lol.

Might seem trivial to some ,until its their words in print without so much as an ask .

[Rabbit Hunter 6,613]

So who is Craggers?

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

From a copyright point of view

 

Unless agreed at sign up to THL, the original poster will retain the copyright on anything that they have written

 

In terms of words; infringement would be taking a 'substantial' part of the text. This is often determined by a number of characters reprinted, but not always

 

In terms of recourse; the law states you can reclaim what you have lost, or what you value that content at. In practicality (until the infringer publishing) you would usually need to issue an infringement warning beforehand, like foxdropper has done

 

if anyone wants to know a little about copyright law then ask here or pm me. I've previously given advice to a couple of members regarding stolen photos appearing in print but why chose not to persue at that time

Cheers for making others aware mate .

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

So who is Craggers?

Someone who uses this site but dare not write anything for fear of ridicule .A well known author and writer of hunting fiction .