Shots Fired Outside Parliament

[Haiddheliwr 1,911]

In my opinion it is one of the most obvious places to have armed police!

[Haiddheliwr 1,911]

 

always hated them always will - been said a thousand times "where are all the muslims condoning it" ? why aren't they marching in their thousands and at least trying to convince us that they condone it?

Condemn

yes that's the word thanks for that mate!

[mackay 3,384]

 

 

TBH honest i hate the left wing appeasers and the politicians thats destroyed area's with their multicultural diversity bullshit.

There in a nutshell is your problem, a much greater problem than the immigrants themselves.

I don't know anyone who is genuinely a racist or is all for zero immigration.

However they have concerns, the level of immigration, the type of immigrant we are letting into the country and the build up, take over, call it what you will of large areas by immigrants.

We are as a people not allowed to discuss these issues, being put down immediately by the left as racists if we even dare to raise these concerns.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remember Bliar and new labour?, you were vilified as a right wing thug if you dared to question immigration levels.

If the whole sordid corrupt affair had been handled openly and fairly instead of being used as a political tool by the left we would not be sitting in the situation we see ourselves in now.

I would also think the genuine asylum seeker/immigrants situation would probably be better off as well.

 

I'm all for zero immigration.

 

For everyone and every country?.

[walshie 2,804]

 

For everyone and every country?.

 

 

We're full.

[Born Hunter 17,780]

I think the idea of the police being unarmed at parliament is a statement of our "free" state... I kind of see the point but obviously it's a redundant sentiment now... Arm em to the teeth I say.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/09/british-police-officers-asked-want-carry-guns-wake-terror-attacks/

 

Dunno what the result was.

 

Also, although I understand that that individual copper wasn't armed, there were armed officers in the immediate vicinity who responded and dealt with the threat.

 

It highlights very well how having 'a good guy with a gun' on the scene can stop these attacks very quickly.

Edited March 23, 2017 by Born Hunter

[DogMan85 722]

In short it's never going to happen because as I keep saying ( like a broken f***ing record) the people don't have the fibre for it........f**k sake, 16 million are crying like babies over Brexit because they are afraid they may not be able to afford the latest telly in 3 years time.

That's the reality of Britain folks !

What do you want folk to do about it? I wouldn't risk my freedom, my job or my family for an event that didn't directly affect me even if I would deport the lot today given half the chance.

 

They are allowed to carry out these acts because the government allows it despite their entire knowledge of the situation.

[nans pat 2,575]

 

I think the idea of the police being unarmed at parliament is a statement of our "free" state... I kind of see the point but obviously it's a redundant sentiment now... Arm em to the teeth I say.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/09/british-police-officers-asked-want-carry-guns-wake-terror-attacks/

 

Dunno what the result was.

 

Also, although I understand that that individual copper wasn't armed, there were armed officers in the immediate vicinity who responded and dealt with the threat.

 

It highlights very well how having 'a good guy with a gun' on the scene can stop these attacks very quickly.

 

BUT....they failed to stop it.if that cop had of had a high powered short 2 in the chest would have put the stabbing out of his head.

[Born Hunter 17,780]

 

 

I think the idea of the police being unarmed at parliament is a statement of our "free" state... I kind of see the point but obviously it's a redundant sentiment now... Arm em to the teeth I say.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/09/british-police-officers-asked-want-carry-guns-wake-terror-attacks/

 

Dunno what the result was.

 

Also, although I understand that that individual copper wasn't armed, there were armed officers in the immediate vicinity who responded and dealt with the threat.

 

It highlights very well how having 'a good guy with a gun' on the scene can stop these attacks very quickly.

 

BUT....they failed to stop it.if that cop had of had a high powered short 2 in the chest would have put the stabbing out of his head.

 

 

From what I can see the armed officer did stop it. He killed the attacker at the point at which the terrorist had only killed 3 people. Arming the bobby wouldn't have saved any lives other than his own.

 

That's not to say he shouldn't have been armed, just stating some facts. There were armed officers in the immediate vicinity to end the violence and they did. No amount of police firepower would have prevented the attack entirely. Arming all officers is sensible, I agree, the more good guys with guns spread about the faster attacks can be stopped. But this wouldn't have changed much here other than to have saved the officers life by making him an undesirably hard target. Terrorists don't hit armed targets unless suitably armed themselves.

Edited March 23, 2017 by Born Hunter

[WILF 47,218]

 

In short it's never going to happen because as I keep saying ( like a broken f***ing record) the people don't have the fibre for it........f**k sake, 16 million are crying like babies over Brexit because they are afraid they may not be able to afford the latest telly in 3 years time.

That's the reality of Britain folks !

What do you want folk to do about it? I wouldn't risk my freedom, my job or my family for an event that didn't directly affect me even if I would deport the lot today given half the chance.

They are allowed to carry out these acts because the government allows it despite their entire knowledge of the situation.

Exactly !

[scothunter 12,609]

Kinda with wilf on this. How many of you buy you're curry or kebab from them.

 

Never tried one no idea if id like it or not, but the fact i dont like them and the thought of there grubby hands over my food repulses me.

[desertbred 5,490]

 

In short it's never going to happen because as I keep saying ( like a broken f***ing record) the people don't have the fibre for it........f**k sake, 16 million are crying like babies over Brexit because they are afraid they may not be able to afford the latest telly in 3 years time.

That's the reality of Britain folks !

What do you want folk to do about it? I wouldn't risk my freedom, my job or my family for an event that didn't directly affect me even if I would deport the lot today given half the chance.

 

They are allowed to carry out these acts because the government allows it despite their entire knowledge of the situation.

 

Apparently the terrorist who carried out this Barbaric act was British born so where to and how would you deport such criminals?

[desertbred 5,490]

R.IP to all the victims and commiserations to all affected by this cowardly terror attack.

[nans pat 2,575]

 

 

 

I think the idea of the police being unarmed at parliament is a statement of our "free" state... I kind of see the point but obviously it's a redundant sentiment now... Arm em to the teeth I say.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/09/british-police-officers-asked-want-carry-guns-wake-terror-attacks/

 

Dunno what the result was.

 

Also, although I understand that that individual copper wasn't armed, there were armed officers in the immediate vicinity who responded and dealt with the threat.

 

It highlights very well how having 'a good guy with a gun' on the scene can stop these attacks very quickly.

 

BUT....they failed to stop it.if that cop had of had a high powered short 2 in the chest would have put the stabbing out of his head.

 

 

From what I can see the armed officer did stop it. He killed the attacker at the point at which the terrorist had only killed 3 people. Arming the bobby wouldn't have saved any lives other than his own.

 

That's not to say he shouldn't have been armed, just stating some facts. There were armed officers in the immediate vicinity to end the violence and they did. No amount of police firepower would have prevented the attack entirely. Arming all officers is sensible, I agree, the more good guys with guns spread about the faster attacks can be stopped. But this wouldn't have changed much here other than to have saved the officers life by making him an undesirably hard target. Terrorists don't hit armed targets unless suitably armed themselves.

 

yes..but there was cops on the bridge hurted at the start,if all cops were armed some of them could have fired at the jeep.its not dixon of dock green anymore running after them blowing a whistle,this is peoples lives,

[walshie 2,804]

 

 

 

I think the idea of the police being unarmed at parliament is a statement of our "free" state... I kind of see the point but obviously it's a redundant sentiment now... Arm em to the teeth I say.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/09/british-police-officers-asked-want-carry-guns-wake-terror-attacks/

 

Dunno what the result was.

 

Also, although I understand that that individual copper wasn't armed, there were armed officers in the immediate vicinity who responded and dealt with the threat.

 

It highlights very well how having 'a good guy with a gun' on the scene can stop these attacks very quickly.

 

BUT....they failed to stop it.if that cop had of had a high powered short 2 in the chest would have put the stabbing out of his head.

 

 

From what I can see the armed officer did stop it. He killed the attacker at the point at which the terrorist had only killed 3 people. Arming the bobby wouldn't have saved any lives other than his own.

 

That's not to say he shouldn't have been armed, just stating some facts. There were armed officers in the immediate vicinity to end the violence and they did. No amount of police firepower would have prevented the attack entirely. Arming all officers is sensible, I agree, the more good guys with guns spread about the faster attacks can be stopped. But this wouldn't have changed much here other than to have saved the officers life by making him an undesirably hard target. Terrorists don't hit armed targets unless suitably armed themselves.

 

 

That's good enough reason in itself surely?

[scothunter 12,609]

News reader Just said "An attack on London thats never been seen before" EH! What about lee rigby.