Jump to content

Trump Under Fire


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mushroom said:

The chap saying it was a Republican mate ?‍♂️

He's missunderstanding your meaning, like I did at first.

Shroom is saying that the Rep Senator acknowledged that 2000 votes were fraudulent and was dismissive about it. If you found out your team had been cheated logic would dictate you wouldn't be dismissive over it, unless you were some sort of trojan horse/double agent. 

Edited by Born Hunter
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

FCK THIS SHIT   IT'S GETTING SERIOUS NOW    I'M PUTTING ON ALL MY MASONIC REGALIA AND TIN FOILING UP.  IF IT COMES ON TOP AND THE PEADOPHILIC DEAD SQUADS COME FOR YOU THEN SAY

You no it makes sense mate, this one is also cat C sea worthy so I can really get on if needed and if nothing happens don’t think it’s a bad move anyway, like yourself have felt things were not right

You would think, with Bruce being Born in the USA, that he would know that Trump was always Born to Run for president. Trump is Tougher than the Rest & he’s got a Hungry Heart, he’s not going to l

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Born Hunter said:

He's missunderstanding your meaning, like I did at first.

Shroom is saying that the Rep Senator acknowledged that 2000 votes were fraudulent and was dismissive about it. If you found out your team had been cheated logic would dictate you wouldn't be dismissive over it, unless you were some sort of trojan horse/double agent. 

If my team said 2000 dead people participated I would be giving it ?

Admitting dead people voted is like saying we all agree with flat earth. It's stupid and has the pure effect of undermining the whole process of truth.

I don't believe trojan horse or subversive conspiracy b'locks. I have no idea or enough info to make a mind. What I'm saying is, I have seen one thing that is in no way defendable and yet being passed and defended.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

I get ya now. It's out of context so I can't comment.

But my last comment stands. They have the money and the evidence allegedly. Take it to SCOTUS. The fact that it's gone this far and nothing substantial has happened despite many smug promises that this day would never come suggests to me that it's largely nonsense.

Open one eye ffs sake lol read up pa they took it from rep and learnt how to rig it for last 60 yr. fill the courts with corrupt judges and nothing will get through am so dissapointed in you x com on do ya homework ???

Edited by green lurchers
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mushroom said:

If my team said 2000 dead people participated I would be giving it ?

Admitting dead people voted is like saying we all agree with flat earth. It's stupid and has the pure effect of undermining the whole process of truth.

I don't believe trojan horse or subversive conspiracy b'locks. I have no idea or enough info to make a mind. What I'm saying is, I have seen one thing that is in no way defendable and yet being passed and defended.

I can't comment because I don't know the context but I can speculate plenty of alternatives to your interpretation. He's wrong.... he's simply correcting a factual statement..... he's implying that it's inconsequential etc etc.

There's so much utter nonsense being talked in the US right now from the bottom all the way to the top I really think the Senators words are irrelevant. There's procedures in place to deal with all these claims, real systems that can affect the election. They want to crack the f**k on if they are talking the truth.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Born Hunter said:

I can't comment because I don't know the context but I can speculate plenty of alternatives to your interpretation. He's wrong.... he's simply correcting a factual statement..... he's implying that it's inconsequential etc etc.

There's so much utter nonsense being talked in the US right now from the bottom all the way to the top I really think the Senators words are irrelevant. There's procedures in place to deal with all these claims, real systems that can affect the election. They want to crack the f**k on if they are talking the truth.

Rigged systems you mean zzzz

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, green lurchers said:

Open one eye ffs sake lol read up pa they took it from rep and learnt how to rig it for last 60 yr. fill the courts with corrupt judges and nothing will get through am so dissapointed in you x

Learn to write coherent English and I'll shut one eye so as to give you a fighting chance. :thumbs:

Ah right'o, now SCOTUS is rigged too. Funny the man of the hour himself appointed the last judge giving an overwhelming majority. Not to mention he was elected himself four years ago by the same system that is allegedly rigged. :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Born Hunter said:

Learn to write coherent English and I'll shut one eye so as to give you a fighting chance. :thumbs:

Ah right'o, now SCOTUS is rigged too. Funny the man of the hour himself appointed the last judge giving an overwhelming majority. Not to mention he was elected himself four years ago by the same system that is allegedly rigged. :laugh:

I draw the line on gramma police lol 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

Yeah mate, the whole world is against you and him. :laugh:

No world against me I’m a grandad but in my house dont question me lol I drink more wine than Pelosi but am not in her league of bullshit or private security  defund the police and the cnt owns a vineyard lol 

Edited by green lurchers
Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s does seem to be a belief by many that certain republicans are somehow complicit. 
 

On another note I think the interesting thing about the run-off result in Georgia is that it confirms Trump’s loss in that state is not so unbelievable or unlikely after all. Although admittedly Trump’s behaviour in the last two months no doubt contributed to Ossoff’s & Warnock’s win.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, mushroom said:

The chap saying it was a Republican mate ?‍♂️

Excuse me mate I'm on nights so my brain is ticking over. 

My point is Republicans have been making claims of dead voters to undermine the Democratic victory. 

He's bound to stand by those claims even if his claimed figures are less than first stated?

My heads a shambles so am I missing the elephant in the room? 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Accip74 said:

There’s does seem to be a belief by many that certain republicans are somehow complicit. 
 

On another note I think the interesting thing about the run-off result in Georgia is that it confirms Trump’s loss in that state is not so unbelievable or unlikely after all. Although admittedly Trump’s behaviour in the last two months no doubt contributed to Ossoff’s & Warnock’s win.

I whole heartedly agree why else would anyone vote for a black power Marxist sympathiser wife beater lol Jesus wept but I can understand that folk can’t look up on past n history bc just like Kamala it gets deleted quicker than a ballot harvest at midnight lol 

Edited by green lurchers
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

He's missunderstanding your meaning, like I did at first.

Shroom is saying that the Rep Senator acknowledged that 2000 votes were fraudulent and was dismissive about it. If you found out your team had been cheated logic would dictate you wouldn't be dismissive over it, unless you were some sort of trojan horse/double agent. 

Yeah I get that now. 

A bit like Trump's claims that Covid-19 was man made and released in China. 

If that was case does anyone believe the States or any other nation would be so dismissive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

Excuse me mate I'm on nights so my brain is ticking over. 

My point is Republicans have been making claims of dead voters to undermine the Democratic victory. 

He's bound to stand by those claims even if his claimed figures are less than first stated?

My heads a shambles so am I missing the elephant in the room? 

 

 

Aye but this Republican chap "DEFENDED" 2000 dead voters. Didn't use it as an "oh this is a mess and conspiracy" moment. Which immediately had the spider sense tingling ?‍♂️

You cannot defend even one dead voter voting, end of story.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, mushroom said:

Aye but this Republican chap "DEFENDED" 2000 dead voters. Didn't use it as an "oh this is a mess and conspiracy" moment. Which immediately had the spider sense tingling ?‍♂️

You cannot defend even one dead voter voting, end of story.

What if he put his vote in his will? ?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...