Jump to content

Trump Under Fire


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

FCK THIS SHIT   IT'S GETTING SERIOUS NOW    I'M PUTTING ON ALL MY MASONIC REGALIA AND TIN FOILING UP.  IF IT COMES ON TOP AND THE PEADOPHILIC DEAD SQUADS COME FOR YOU THEN SAY

You no it makes sense mate, this one is also cat C sea worthy so I can really get on if needed and if nothing happens don’t think it’s a bad move anyway, like yourself have felt things were not right

You would think, with Bruce being Born in the USA, that he would know that Trump was always Born to Run for president. Trump is Tougher than the Rest & he’s got a Hungry Heart, he’s not going to l

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Francie said:

The only reason I'm annoyed,is cause this administration are war mongers.

Whatever folk say,trump has no innocents blood on his hands,he never invaded anywhere for money or oil,rather he used diplomacy to get his way.

Not one Democrat can say f**k all to trump,hes not a war monger thank f**k.

I find it laughable that any Democrats can say trumps orangemen bad,when they've voted for every war  an invasion going.

Untold millions of children have died because of it,an still to this day,they ate far forgone in the head if the think theyvecthe moral high ground with trump,if they have any.

Let's look at the new secretary of state,Anthony blinked.

War monger to the core,who supported an advocated for every war an invasion,evil to the core these people,but no trumps the worst,he said some bad things an hurt peoples feelings.

What a f***ing disgrace this had become,these scumbags will rubbing there hands with glee,an the money to be made,the globalists have won the battle but not the war.

Yeah Trump was a regular f***ing pacifist! :laugh:

I personally rated his strategy regarding foreign policy but not because he was steady on the trigger. LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, greg64 said:

Nah mate can't be right. Covert secret squirrel false flag operators are known for dressing in the most memorable and attention attracting outfit so as to very easily get caught out. I think it's lesson 3.C in the subversion class at ninja school for the intelligence services. :big_boss:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, mushroom said:

I'm pretty centre politically but there is a rat here and it stinks. I watched a video of a phone call today (?‍♂️ yes I know ?) of that Georgian Republican, I think he is a senator, stating about voter fraud etc now when asked about 5000 dead voters voting, he replied no it was just 2000 ? Now as sure as I have a dickhead dog that's not right whether it's 1 or 5000. The dead ain't supposed to vote, no matter how you look at it ? and that's a Republican senator. Something isn't adding up here ?‍♂️

So the bottom line is the losing side claim voter fraud? Is that so surprising? POTUS is making that claim so why should we be surprised that a Senator is too?

Now I'm damned sure I haven't pulled a million all nighters 'looking at the evidence!' like many of the fellas on this thread have but I'm also pretty sure that if the evidence was as conclusive as folks are pretending then the republican dominated SCOTUS would let us all know...... That's if the side making the claims really has the conviction to take it that far.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Born Hunter said:

So the bottom line is the losing side claim voter fraud? Is that so surprising? POTUS is making that claim so why should we be surprised that a Senator is too?

Now I'm damned sure I haven't pulled a million all nighters 'looking at the evidence!' like many of the fellas on this thread have but I'm also pretty sure that if the evidence was as conclusive as folks are pretending then the republican dominated SCOTUS would let us all know...... That's if the side making the claims really has the conviction to take it that far.

I think you may have misunderstood me or I didn't put it right. My concern is that a Republican senator when asked about 5000 dead people voting, he replied and I quote "no it was only 2000" now correct me but Don is a Republican and his own senators are admitting dead people voted and passing it off like nothing ?‍♂️

As I said, there's a rat. No one in their right mind can defend 2000 dead people casting a ballot. Whether Republican, Democrat or monster raving looney party.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mushroom said:

I think you may have misunderstood me or I didn't put it right. My concern is that a Republican senator when asked about 5000 dead people voting, he replied and I quote "no it was only 2000" now correct me but Don is a Republican and his own senators are admitting dead people voted and passing it off like nothing ?‍♂️

As I said, there's a rat. No one in their right mind can defend 2000 dead people casting a ballot. Whether Republican, Democrat or monster raving looney party.

I get ya now. It's out of context so I can't comment.

But my last comment stands. They have the money and the evidence allegedly. Take it to SCOTUS. The fact that it's gone this far and nothing substantial has happened despite many smug promises that this day would never come suggests to me that it's largely nonsense.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mushroom said:

I think you may have misunderstood me or I didn't put it right. My concern is that a Republican senator when asked about 5000 dead people voting, he replied and I quote "no it was only 2000" now correct me but Don is a Republican and his own senators are admitting dead people voted and passing it off like nothing ?‍♂️

As I said, there's a rat. No one in their right mind can defend 2000 dead people casting a ballot. Whether Republican, Democrat or monster raving looney party.

Of course he's going to say that, these supposed dead people bolstered the Democrats. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, mushroom said:

I think you may have misunderstood me or I didn't put it right. My concern is that a Republican senator when asked about 5000 dead people voting, he replied and I quote "no it was only 2000" now correct me but Don is a Republican and his own senators are admitting dead people voted and passing it off like nothing ?‍♂️

As I said, there's a rat. No one in their right mind can defend 2000 dead people casting a ballot. Whether Republican, Democrat or monster raving looney party.

Whats It under mate? I’d like to hear that for myself. Just for context ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...