Trump Under Fire

[green lurchers 16,706]

18 minutes ago, Nik_B said:

and conspiracy theories President Elect Green Lurchers

More votes than Obama n Hillary lololol and Hillary touted as foreign affairs  hah hah hah 

Edited November 13, 2020 by green lurchers

[green lurchers 16,706]

22 minutes ago, green lurchers said:

More votes than Obama n Hillary lololol and Hillary touted as foreign affairs  hah hah hah 

From one dem to another tulsi is a proper sort.  

 

Edited November 13, 2020 by green lurchers

[Nik_B 3,790]

11 minutes ago, green lurchers said:

From one dem to another tulsi is a proper sort.  

 

If they'd wanted to win without cheating they should have picked Tulsi

[green lurchers 16,706]

14 minutes ago, Nik_B said:

If they'd wanted to win without cheating they should have picked Tulsi

I would have polled her ballot 

[Born Hunter 17,775]

27 minutes ago, green lurchers said:

From one dem to another tulsi is a proper sort.  

 

How the hell did they end up with Hillary when they had Tulsi? How the hell did they end up with Biden when they had Bernie?

What the f**k is wrong with the system when any sane person can see the wrong people are winning the races.

[Nik_B 3,790]

Truckers threatening to strike starting on the 29th of November

 

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

[ChrisJones 7,975]

14 hours ago, Nik_B said:

I have no idea but it seems unlikely that a serious investigation into software could be carried out within a short period of time.

It could be. AG Barr has already authorised it. DOJ have the means, the resources should the need arise. Trump is still the president and has the entire federal LE departments at his disposal. The problem is the evidence which doesn't seem to be filed along with the lawsuits. They're getting tossed out, repeatedly. Either there is a massive conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of people from volunteer election workers, all the way up to senior Trump administration officials, or they're simply throwing sh*t to see if any of it will stick. Which is it?

Look at the Biden laptop controversy. They could have investigated it and sunk Biden right before the polls opened. Instead they gave it to the New York Post to run a hit piece. It was either bullsh*t or the Trump administration made the worst tactical decision in recent memory. The fact that it's now being conveniently ignored speaks volumes.

As an American voter I actively encourage every and all means of these investigations because the integrity of the system itself is under scrutiny. If there really is massive fraud in play we should know about it and punish the perpetrators. We want the full details of when, and how. If there isn't, and this is just the cherry on the top for Trump administration, the whole world needs to know too. After 4 years of Trumpism maybe he's not the messiah but just a very naughty boy?

Edited November 14, 2020 by ChrisJones

[ChrisJones 7,975]

8 hours ago, Born Hunter said:

What the f**k is wrong with the system when any sane person can see the wrong people are winning the races.

I don't think it matters to them what sane people think. The system is only interested in protecting the system. A few billion $ here and there ensure that a sane person won't even get a platform. If you own the stadium and you only let two people get all of the spotlight, those tuning in could be forgiven for thinking there's only two horses in the race. Their own pollsters are trying to get the best info on which horse is the most palatable with the fans. They'll take someone who's broadly popular over someone that's a hit with one demographic but scores poorly with others.

Bernie is a classic example. He resonates with young progressive voters who traditionally don't turn out at the polls he's been successfully maligned as a communist and that makes him a very hard sell with the older voters who grew up on a steady diet of redbaiting, and in turn are more likely to go out and vote.

As we've said for years it's about winning and losing not about what's right versus what's wrong.

 

[Accip74 7,112]

10 hours ago, Born Hunter said:

How the hell did they end up with Hillary when they had Tulsi? How the hell did they end up with Biden when they had Bernie?

What the f**k is wrong with the system when any sane person can see the wrong people are winning the races.

Listening to Tulsi you could easily forget who she represents for a moment. She sinks Harris in the early debates & low behold Harris get’s pushed to the front again. Wtf!

[green lurchers 16,706]

30 minutes ago, Accip74 said:

Listening to Tulsi you could easily forget who she represents for a moment. She sinks Harris in the early debates & low behold Harris get’s pushed to the front again. Wtf!

Wasn’t it Hillary who accused tulsi of being bought n paid fir by Russia. ? 

 

Edited November 14, 2020 by green lurchers

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

[Nik_B 3,790]

7 hours ago, ChrisJones said:

It could be. AG Barr has already authorised it. DOJ have the means, the resources should the need arise. Trump is still the president and has the entire federal LE departments at his disposal. The problem is the evidence which doesn't seem to be filed along with the lawsuits. They're getting tossed out, repeatedly. Either there is a massive conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of people from volunteer election workers, all the way up to senior Trump administration officials, or they're simply throwing sh*t to see if any of it will stick. Which is it?

I don't think a giant conspiracy is necessary to prove and I have no idea if there was anything like that but what appears to have happened is huge amounts of ballots were cast in a way that does not conform with state law especially where there was no chain of custody or where observers weren't present, that seems to be the main push from the Trump campaign especially in PA, Wisconsin and Michigan and maybe Nevada and Arizona.

In my opinion much of this will hinge on the Georgia recount, if it flips red next week then the momentum will be there to push on but if it stays blue I think it will be very difficult to carry on unless they can flip Arizona via a recount but so far Arizona says they will not do a recount and I'm not sure they have any law that states if the margin is less 1% or 0.5% (like some states) then an automatic recount must happen. Maybe you know?

If Georgia does go red then I think Trump has a very good possibility of winning in the end because he will only need to win challenges in Wisconsin and PA for a recount and audit.

You keep talking about conspiracies, I'm just listening to what Trump and people like Ted Cruz say.

 

[Nik_B 3,790]

7 hours ago, ChrisJones said:

Look at the Biden laptop controversy. They could have investigated it and sunk Biden right before the polls opened. Instead they gave it to the New York Post to run a hit piece. It was either bullsh*t or the Trump administration made the worst tactical decision in recent memory. The fact that it's now being conveniently ignored speaks volumes.

I don't think I've even mentioned the Biden Laptop and to me it's just a distraction and doesn't have any bearing on the election.

4chan and other places have shared images and alleged emails all over the place, the pictures are revolting and he's obviously a druggy but that has little effect on the election especially now. I highly doubt there will be a criminal investigation into it, that never seems to happen.

[Nik_B 3,790]

Fraud happens in every election same in the UK the question is...how much this time?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fraud-clark-county-election-officials-accepted-my-signature-8-different-ballot-envelopes