Conspiracy Theories/truths..

[BGD 6,437]

May not have batted an eyelid at the time but after they went down we would of heard from witnesses that saw unexplained workman rigging something up I'm sure.

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tell me that isn't a controlled demolition

It does look like it, but knowing how long it takes to set something like that up, isn't it likely someone would have seen a load of blokes walking around with explosives in the weeks/months beforehand?

 

Or have they been "dealt with?"

I offer no explanations, that's how you get labelled a conspiracy nut

 

All I'm saying is I cannot believe that a little fire or debris caused WTC7 to collapse perfectly like that.

 

The DOD, Secret Services and the CIA used that building, crazy to imagine they would occupy a building that could be knocked down by a mouse's fart lol

They did a program on how to use explosives to ring down one of the buildings in 9/11. It would have taken a week of a gang of 20 explosive guys drilling into concrete supports and installing thousands of yards of det cables to achieve.

No conspiracy just fate and some nasty Muslims.

If it would take all that then how did two planes, that did not get anywhere near the concrete supports bring them down?

I'm certainly no expert, however the documentary used leading scientists in metals to describe the temperatures created didn't melt the girders they where just hot enough to soften them, the fact there was the weight of a quarter of the tower hundreds of thousands of tonnes on top of this damage it just buckled and the force collapsed the towers.

Steel girders are sprayed with fireproofing insulation in all commercial buildings these days, that's to stop them buckling during a fire.

Fire proofing is only a delay though surely, fire proofing is rated by the hours it can sustain a fire for example a 1 hour rated fire door?

 

I don't understand why this is being questioned if you see the towers collapse they don't collapse from the bottom they implode from the top just as the experts said and where the aircraft damage is or are we saying the terrorists were part of the conspiricey?

 

There is no conspiracy here chaps. JFK I think so, Princess Diana hmm may be, moon landings extremely doubtful, but this, nothing other than people wanting to see things that aren't there.

 

ATB

 

 

It's being questioned because a 3rd building that was not hit by an aircraft nor was filled with aviation fuel seemingly collapsed in free fall into it's own footprint.

[Nik_B 3,790]

May not have batted an eyelid at the time but after they went down we would of heard from witnesses that saw unexplained workman rigging something up I'm sure.

 

There are witnesses that said they heard many explosions though, they were the firefighters....again there can be some explanation for this but it cannot be ignored

[Lenmcharristar 10,070]

The planes must have been hollowgrams too

[General lee 979]

So are you all saying it wasn't terrorists it wasn't bin laden and it wasn't Muslims or are you all saying it was terrorists being helped by the American government or are you all saying it was just the American government because I'm confused

[Lenmcharristar 10,070]

So are you all saying it wasn't terrorists it wasn't bin laden and it wasn't Muslims or are you all saying it was terrorists being helped by the American government or are you all saying it was just the American government because I'm confused

i blame the Russians or brexit

[waltjnr 7,555]

The One show had something to do with it !Did you notice it wasnt on that evening?

[BGD 6,437]

So are you all saying it wasn't terrorists it wasn't bin laden and it wasn't Muslims or are you all saying it was terrorists being helped by the American government or are you all saying it was just the American government because I'm confused

[Rabbit Hunter 6,613]

I've watched all the conspiracy videos on Youtube but surely they're clutching at straws? For something that big to be an inside job would take hundreds (maybe thousands?)of people to organise . You can't tell me that all them people wouldn't have a conscience and know that what they're doing would kill thousands of innocent people. I just can't see it.

I've been watching a few videos on the Pyramids lately and the conspiracists say that they couldnt have been built using the tools they had and its got to have been Aliens or something along them lines.

[CushtyJook 1,097]

Rigging a building that size would have been a piece of piss I'm afraid, I spent my working life in and out of commercial building like that and on a building that size 200 blokes milling about for months wouldn't even get noticed chaps.

Simply no one would bat an eyelid.

Without looking into it to much apparently there was a massive elevator upgrade project happening for a while many months before 911 but then like I said without looking into it you never know how true it is but I think there is good evedence to suggest that's the case

[gnasher16 30,767]

The biggest conspiracy theory of the lot is how West Ham can have a blind referee every single week !!

[delswal 3,819]

The biggest conspiracy theory of the lot is how West Ham can have a blind referee every single week !!

Maybe the FA think that the way West Ham play a blind referee will suffice

[neil cooney 10,416]

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

Melting steel and having two buildings collapse into their own footprint is something that has never happened ever before, I find it pointless to talk about this to people since you then get labelled as a conspiracy theorist however I doubt this is even scientifically possible. Then there is WTC7 which was not even hit by anything and also collapsed freefall into it's own footprint.

 

I just try to stick to facts and science where possible but from the minute I saw it happen I found the 3 building collapsing this way very very strange.

 

If even one of those buildings has not collapsed fully or half of one of them had toppled over slightly I would have had no problems believing the official story.

Show me footage of a plane flying into a skyscraper and staying upright then I'll come back to you.

 

An American bomber flew in to the Empire State building in the '40s and killed a few people.

I think the building was only shut for a couple of weeks.

It's still standing today.

[BGD 6,437]

 

 

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

Melting steel and having two buildings collapse into their own footprint is something that has never happened ever before, I find it pointless to talk about this to people since you then get labelled as a conspiracy theorist however I doubt this is even scientifically possible. Then there is WTC7 which was not even hit by anything and also collapsed freefall into it's own footprint.

 

I just try to stick to facts and science where possible but from the minute I saw it happen I found the 3 building collapsing this way very very strange.

 

If even one of those buildings has not collapsed fully or half of one of them had toppled over slightly I would have had no problems believing the official story.

Show me footage of a plane flying into a skyscraper and staying upright then I'll come back to you.

An American bomber flew in to the Empire State building in the '40s and killed a few people.

I think the building was only shut for a couple of weeks.

It's still standing today.

Not really comparable, a B-25 weighs about 200,000lbs less than a 767

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

Melting steel and having two buildings collapse into their own footprint is something that has never happened ever before, I find it pointless to talk about this to people since you then get labelled as a conspiracy theorist however I doubt this is even scientifically possible. Then there is WTC7 which was not even hit by anything and also collapsed freefall into it's own footprint.

 

I just try to stick to facts and science where possible but from the minute I saw it happen I found the 3 building collapsing this way very very strange.

 

If even one of those buildings has not collapsed fully or half of one of them had toppled over slightly I would have had no problems believing the official story.

Show me footage of a plane flying into a skyscraper and staying upright then I'll come back to you.

An American bomber flew in to the Empire State building in the '40s and killed a few people.

I think the building was only shut for a couple of weeks.

It's still standing today.

At what speed, what fuel was it carrying?