Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Lets face it they don't build em like they used to Genbaku Dōmu in Hiroshima survived an almost direct hit (2000ft from detonation) of a 15 Kiloton nuclear bomb Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shepp 2,285 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO. Melting steel and having two buildings collapse into their own footprint is something that has never happened ever before, I find it pointless to talk about this to people since you then get labelled as a conspiracy theorist however I doubt this is even scientifically possible. Then there is WTC7 which was not even hit by anything and also collapsed freefall into it's own footprint. I just try to stick to facts and science where possible but from the minute I saw it happen I found the 3 building collapsing this way very very strange. If even one of those buildings has not collapsed fully or half of one of them had toppled over slightly I would have had no problems believing the official story. Show me footage of a plane flying into a skyscraper and staying upright then I'll come back to you. An American bomber flew in to the Empire State building in the '40s and killed a few people.I think the building was only shut for a couple of weeks. It's still standing today. Not really comparable, a B-25 weighs about 200,000lbs less than a 767 Flying slower and carrying less fuel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Must be the American construction, this one survived after burning for 24 hours Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Must be the American construction, this one survived after burning for 24 hours What caused that fire? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 RCC structures subjected to explosions usually collapse due to shock waves unless earth quake proof structures the fire and intensity is secondary in the building collapsing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 No ones mentioned the billions of dollar insurance, that was taken out just before 911? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dazbrowne 13 334 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 No ones mentioned the billions of dollar insurance, that was taken out just before 911?on the money there pal about a week or two before insured against a terrorist attack ironic .posts saying wouldn't people spot odd goings on inside the wtc leading up to this they would be the people who died wouldn't they 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 I be the most of these rumours are not even true.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 I be the most of these rumours are not even true.... Exactly it's hard to know what is and isn't unless you done your own hard research Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MickC 1,825 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 (edited) Convenient bullshit hidden among true but outlandish stories is the normal process/protocol that the powers that be use to try and keep a lid on something,however due to the Internet etc and the technology available to the general public these days its not as easy to throw a blanket over things now and keep it out of the public domain.As an example go on Google moon and look at all the areas that have been deliberately pixelated out,if theres nothing there then why the need to do this..Its only classed as a conspiracy theory until the powers that be admit to it !! Edited January 3, 2017 by MickC Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 If anyone could 100% prove any of these are conspiracies, you'd either be a millionaire or bumped off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 If anyone could 100% prove any of these are conspiracies, you'd either be a millionaire or bumped off. and then if you give names of people who were probably bumped off like Dr David Kelly or Danny Jowenko you are still a conspiracy nut lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Or the flying instructors that said some of them were incapable of flying a large aircraft and were very poor pilots. Sure some people might think it's easy to fly a plane if all you have to do is crash it in to something but aircraft at high speeds are very hard to control and the cockpits of a large airliner will be very hard to find your way around. I have a pilots licence (expired now) and once got a chance to fly a real USAF simulator for a B-52....We were clueless sitting in that cockpit, even when the instructor got the engines going it took two of us to get it off the ground and we crashed after a minute lol Yes this is a true story Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 No ones mentioned the billions of dollar insurance, that was taken out just before 911?on the money there pal about a week or two before insured against a terrorist attack ironic .posts saying wouldn't people spot odd goings on inside the wtc leading up to this they would be the people who died wouldn't they Yeah, insured during Larry Silverstein purchinsing the whole of the world trade centre and taking out all risk insurance which covered an act of terrorism? But I guess it dose sound more interesting if you forget to mention the purchase and the fact that having it insured against terrorism is just part of full insurance?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 P.s at least one Boeing was flying at 586 MPH on impact, outside the operating range of the 767. At this speed he managed to hit a target only 63 metres wide Impressive piloting skills Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.