lukey 1,621 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS They didn't hit WTC7 That's right, but it did catch fire that went on in controlled. Are you convinced that wtc7 went down controlled? I'm saying I don't believe fire alone can make a building fall down so quickly and perfectly like happened with WTC7. No one can use the argument of thousands of gallons of jet fuel melting the steel beams in WTC7 because no aircraft hit it. I offer no theories other than what it looks like to me, you wont get me blaming Mossad or remote control planes lol but there are some weird inconsistencies with 9/11 that are hard to believe I think buildings are built to withstand fire giving time to be put out but anything just left to burn will surly collapse? The insides of the building including the structure could have burned enough to bring it down? Fuk knows! Also what way would a building fall if it were to come down? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 The pentagon is one everyone needs to look into to really understand the nature of it it just isn't possible a plane hit it one if the most secure building in America and they don't even have footage of a plane hitting it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 Plus the size of the hole is about 15 foot long Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 now now girls..no arguing thank you... so who watched it then...and thoughts.. Sorry Byron but just like the 9/11 planes your thread has been hijacked 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS They didn't hit WTC7 That's right, but it did catch fire that went on in controlled. Are you convinced that wtc7 went down controlled? I'm saying I don't believe fire alone can make a building fall down so quickly and perfectly like happened with WTC7. No one can use the argument of thousands of gallons of jet fuel melting the steel beams in WTC7 because no aircraft hit it. I offer no theories other than what it looks like to me, you wont get me blaming Mossad or remote control planes lol but there are some weird inconsistencies with 9/11 that are hard to believe Just a thought mate, do you think since 9/11 they have been using evidence from it all to build towers ect differently to how they did in 1966? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 28,170 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 wasnt there speculation the steels and internal beams had been painted with super thermite?That stuff will burn a hole through an RSJ like a knife through butter if you do it right. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS They didn't hit WTC7 That's right, but it did catch fire that went on in controlled. Are you convinced that wtc7 went down controlled? I'm saying I don't believe fire alone can make a building fall down so quickly and perfectly like happened with WTC7. No one can use the argument of thousands of gallons of jet fuel melting the steel beams in WTC7 because no aircraft hit it. I offer no theories other than what it looks like to me, you wont get me blaming Mossad or remote control planes lol but there are some weird inconsistencies with 9/11 that are hard to believe I think buildings are built to withstand fire giving time to be put out but anything just left to burn will surly collapse? The insides of the building including the structure could have burned enough to bring it down? Fuk knows! Also what way would a building fall if it were to come down? This covers the engineers and architect's (who don't agree with the official story) point of view 3 hours of boring youtube videos lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWuOKBVtWDU I have watched what they say, it makes sense but I am not an enginner and really sh*t at maths so I couldn't possibly be able to verify it. I like to keep an open mind (I don't see what's wrong with doing so) but as far as 9/11 geos it's pointless to argue over, if it was some giant conspiracy we'll never know, if it isn't it will always look a bit strange. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 None of this would have happened if Paul McCartney was still alive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 None of this would have happened if Paul McCartney was still alive. He has a lot to answer for....and Elvis 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 28,170 Posted January 2, 2017 Report Share Posted January 2, 2017 None of this would have happened if Paul McCartney was still alive. He has a lot to answer for....and Elvis And princess dianna killed 20 years ago this coming august. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Tell me that isn't a controlled demolition It does look like it, but knowing how long it takes to set something like that up, isn't it likely someone would have seen a load of blokes walking around with explosives in the weeks/months beforehand? Or have they been "dealt with?" I offer no explanations, that's how you get labelled a conspiracy nut All I'm saying is I cannot believe that a little fire or debris caused WTC7 to collapse perfectly like that. The DOD, Secret Services and the CIA used that building, crazy to imagine they would occupy a building that could be knocked down by a mouse's fart lol They did a program on how to use explosives to ring down one of the buildings in 9/11. It would have taken a week of a gang of 20 explosive guys drilling into concrete supports and installing thousands of yards of det cables to achieve. No conspiracy just fate and some nasty Muslims. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,274 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 "Conspiracy theorist" is a phrase apparently thought up by certain American agencies following the assisanation of JFK.. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,274 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 The pentagon is one everyone needs to look into to really understand the nature of it it just isn't possible a plane hit it one if the most secure building in America and they don't even have footage of a plane hitting it & the lamp posts outside still standing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 The Russians were definately involved. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted January 3, 2017 Report Share Posted January 3, 2017 Tell me that isn't a controlled demolition It does look like it, but knowing how long it takes to set something like that up, isn't it likely someone would have seen a load of blokes walking around with explosives in the weeks/months beforehand? Or have they been "dealt with?" I offer no explanations, that's how you get labelled a conspiracy nut All I'm saying is I cannot believe that a little fire or debris caused WTC7 to collapse perfectly like that. The DOD, Secret Services and the CIA used that building, crazy to imagine they would occupy a building that could be knocked down by a mouse's fart lol They did a program on how to use explosives to ring down one of the buildings in 9/11. It would have taken a week of a gang of 20 explosive guys drilling into concrete supports and installing thousands of yards of det cables to achieve. No conspiracy just fate and some nasty Muslims. If it would take all that then how did two planes, that did not get anywhere near the concrete supports bring them down? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.