Conspiracy Theories/truths..

[Lenmcharristar 9,727]

Some stoners in here, paranoid wrecks lol

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

Tell me that isn't a controlled demolition

 

It does look like it, but knowing how long it takes to set something like that up, isn't it likely someone would have seen a load of blokes walking around with explosives in the weeks/months beforehand?

 

Or have they been "dealt with?"

 

 

I offer no explanations, that's how you get labelled a conspiracy nut

 

All I'm saying is I cannot believe that a little fire or debris caused WTC7 to collapse perfectly like that.

 

The DOD, Secret Services and the CIA used that building, crazy to imagine they would occupy a building that could be knocked down by a mouse's fart lol

[lukey 1,621]

https://youtu.be/uFJa9WUy5QI

 

Would this explain anything or are yous just convinced it's a controlled thing? I don't know the answer

[BGD 6,436]

 

 

Tell me that isn't a controlled demolition

It does look like it, but knowing how long it takes to set something like that up, isn't it likely someone would have seen a load of blokes walking around with explosives in the weeks/months beforehand?

 

Or have they been "dealt with?"

That's what makes most of these conspiracy theories so hard to believe, thousands of people would have to of been involved and I find it impossible to beleive they would have all kept schtum.

[lukey 1,621]

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS ??

[Nik_B 3,790]

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS

 

They didn't hit WTC7

[Nik_B 3,790]

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS

 

The two skyscrapers were designed to withstand a 707 impact because in the 40s a B25 flew into the Empire state building and was set on fire.

 

Maybe those engineers just did a really sh*t job of building them and used cheap none reinforced steel?

[lukey 1,621]

 

 

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS

They didn't hit WTC7

That's right, but it did catch fire that went on in controlled. Are you convinced that wtc7 went down controlled?

[byron 1,169]

now now girls..no arguing thank you...

so who watched it then...and thoughts..

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

just a coincidence then that a hijacker crashes a fully fueled plane into a building an there passport the first thing they pull out the rubble

Is this the truth or just a rumour??

[lukey 1,621]

 

 

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS

The two skyscrapers were designed to withstand a 707 impact because in the 40s a B25 flew into the Empire state building and was set on fire.

 

Maybe those engineers just did a really sh*t job of building them and used cheap none reinforced steel?

Couldn't tell you nik I'm just pretty sure both towers had a very big plane f****d into them then they fell down, wish I knew the answers

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

Melting steel and having two buildings collapse into their own footprint is something that has never happened ever before, I find it pointless to talk about this to people since you then get labelled as a conspiracy theorist however I doubt this is even scientifically possible. Then there is WTC7 which was not even hit by anything and also collapsed freefall into it's own footprint.

 

I just try to stick to facts and science where possible but from the minute I saw it happen I found the 3 building collapsing this way very very strange.

 

If even one of those buildings has not collapsed fully or half of one of them had toppled over slightly I would have had no problems believing the official story.

Show me footage of a plane flying into a skyscraper and staying upright then I'll come back to you.

[C556 351]

When someone tells me a conspiracy theory I say show me the evidence.

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

Have yous seen the size of these buildings and the carnage that two massive planes must have caused?? A mouse fart? FFS

They didn't hit WTC7

That's right, but it did catch fire that went on in controlled. Are you convinced that wtc7 went down controlled?

 

 

I'm saying I don't believe fire alone can make a building fall down so quickly and perfectly like happened with WTC7.

 

No one can use the argument of thousands of gallons of jet fuel melting the steel beams in WTC7 because no aircraft hit it.

 

I offer no theories other than what it looks like to me, you wont get me blaming Mossad or remote control planes lol but there are some weird inconsistencies with 9/11 that are hard to believe

[CushtyJook 1,097]

 

 

The only thing questionable about 9/11 is did they know about the attacks and not do anything about it? Anything else is just rubbish IMO.

just a coincidence then that a hijacker crashes a fully fueled plane into a building an there passport the first thing they pull out the rubble

With all due respect you can't belive everything about what they tell you and I'm on about the conspriacy theorists but the pentagon was not even hit by a plane it is obvious and the way building 7 came down that wasn't even hit by a plane either is even more suspect someone once told me the plane that came down in the feild flight 93 was actually destined for wtc7 but a lot of people don't even realise three buildings fell that day