Posting Pictures

[Onlyworkmatters 1,584]

 

So you put a pic up of a dead hare shot legally and fetched back by your lurcher = 100% legal, pic gets took down

 

Put up a video of foxes being legally killed on the lamp in Ireland also 100% legal, video stays up and everyone thinks its fine

 

1. Whats the difference both are 100% legal

 

2. Which 1 do you think does the most damage to fielsports

Because a photo of a dog and hare (with no gun) could be misinterpreted. Couldn't it?

 

A dog and fox in Ireland is just that. And legal.

 

I agree about the damage to fieldsports but I don't think we should have to hide what we do to please the antis. If it's legal.

 

 

Yes, it could be misinterpreted, doesnt alter the fact its 100% legal,videoing killing a fox with a lurcher is legal in Ireland, will the antis use it with the volume off to show us in a bad light, you better believe they will, badgers killed legally in France lined up on a dig, do you think the antis give a toss if they misrepresent us when they use the pics but dont mention it was done legally in France.

 

My point is where does it end, whatever we post the antis will twist it around to use it against us and we're bending over for them by deleting a pic because theres no gun in the pic... If its legal f**k them I say

[jiggy 3,209]

 

 

 

So you put a pic up of a dead hare shot legally and fetched back by your lurcher = 100% legal, pic gets took down

 

Put up a video of foxes being legally killed on the lamp in Ireland also 100% legal, video stays up and everyone thinks its fine

 

1. Whats the difference both are 100% legal

 

2. Which 1 do you think does the most damage to fielsports

Because a photo of a dog and hare (with no gun) could be misinterpreted. Couldn't it?

 

A dog and fox in Ireland is just that. And legal.

 

I agree about the damage to fieldsports but I don't think we should have to hide what we do to please the antis. If it's legal.

Yes, it could be misinterpreted, doesnt alter the fact its 100% legal,videoing killing a fox with a lurcher is legal in Ireland, will the antis use it with the volume off to show us in a bad light, you better believe they will, badgers killed legally in France lined up on a dig, do you think the antis give a toss if they misrepresent us when they use the pics but dont mention it was done legally in France.

 

My point is where does it end, whatever we post the antis will twist it around to use it against us and we're bending over for them by deleting a pic because theres no gun in the pic... If its legal f**k them I say

[jiggy 3,209]

I think the point the mods are making are if it's shot it goes in the shooting section to be fair the air gun lads are pulled up for putting harmless stuff in the air gun section thats not associated with airguns it's not a great conspiracy I've shot pheasants over different dogs but if I did want to big up my dog and it was a gun that killed it I'd put it in the shooting section to save confusion but then the people were trying to impress might not get to read it. For the immature kids it's similiar to your parents telling you not to drink or smoke or do drugs , they did it themselves but are trying to keep you from making the same mistake. Maybe you don't like it now but will appreciate it when the time comes.

[tote 854]

I think the point the mods are making are if it's shot it goes in the shooting section to be fair the air gun lads are pulled up for putting harmless stuff in the air gun section thats not associated with airguns it's not a great conspiracy I've shot pheasants over different dogs but if I did want to big up my dog and it was a gun that killed it I'd put it in the shooting section to save confusion but then the people were trying to impress might not get to read it. For the immature kids it's similiar to your parents telling you not to drink or smoke or do drugs , they did it themselves but are trying to keep you from making the same mistake. Maybe you don't like it now but will appreciate it when the time comes.

Let me get this right, two lads went out and got 10 rabbits ferreting, they then lamped later on and got another 44 with their lurchers and shot a hare. So the pic shows 54 rabbits that were either ferreted or dogged and one hare which was shot and you say it should be in the shooting section, what fecking planet are you on, ffs.

[Joshua Wheeler 60]

Shot and retrived whats the problem??????

[walshie 2,804]

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

 

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

[Haiddheliwr 1,911]

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

[Haiddheliwr 1,911]

Thanks for clarifying that Walshie, should be clear to everyone now!

[Shooterbry 3]

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof

[Francie 6,368]

Correct mate

[walshie 2,804]

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof

 

 

I said apologies to the 1 in 100 who actually has shot the hare in question. By the way, are you sure you aren't nottzhunter as it appears you are using his computer. Just asking, not accusing.

[Tiercel 6,986]

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof.

So when he said I would report him to the RSPCA he was not lying then? FFS grow up and get over it. If he had not posted the picture the second time after I had deleted it none of this would have happened.

 

TC

[Shooterbry 3]

 

 

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof

I said apologies to the 1 in 100 who actually has shot the hare in question. By the way, are you sure you aren't nottzhunter as it appears you are using his computer. Just asking, not accusing.

Nah im on my phone but im at nottzhunters house using his wifi

[Shooterbry 3]

 

 

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof.

So when he said I would report him to the RSPCA he was not lying then? FFS grow up and get over it. If he had not posted the picture the second time after I had deleted it none of this would have happened.

 

TC

I have no idea about any petty arguments/messages that have been sent between you two, sorry

[Tiercel 6,986]

 

 

 

 

Pics should not to be taken down if the person posting states the hare had been shot and retrieved! Maybe a Mod will clarify this? There are t**ts out there who would get upset if it was a mouse getting retrieved! But if we do it right and post accordingly they haven't got a leg to stand on cause its LEGAL!

Because they aren't shot and retrieved that's why. Why would anyone lamp 50 odd rabbits with the dog then shoot 1 hare? People think that by adding "shot and retrieved" it makes everything ok. Apologies to the 1 in a 100 who actually has shot the hare.

 

Same applies to adding "pre-ban" when talking about your 2 year old dog.

 

Legal pics are no problem at all.

Ive already told everyone I SHOT THE HARE IN QUESTION, nottzhunter and rew was out with the dogs and i was out with the gun. So yes it would be stupid to say they killed all the rabbits with dogs but got the gun out to shoot one hare, but knowbody has said that, They said it was shot and retrieved. Dont think anyone has the right to call people liars with no proof.

So when he said I would report him to the RSPCA he was not lying then? FFS grow up and get over it. If he had not posted the picture the second time after I had deleted it none of this would have happened.

 

TC

I have no idea about any petty arguments/messages that have been sent between you two, sorry

 

Well read this thread where he accuses me of threatening to report him to the RSPCA. http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/topic/364750-thats-me-finished/ I don't call that petty I call that malicious, lying just because his ego is bigger than his brain. He had a dam good bag of rabbits there why spoil it just for the extra boost to the ego.

 

Nowhere in the post were you mentioned, that does seem a bit odd that he stated that it was just him and Rew? Then when it blows up you conveniently say you shot it.

 

TC