Rabbit Hunter 6,613 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 This happened about 6 years ago. I would imagine it was the Police rather than anybody else that had the powers to do so. Quote Link to post
Cargol 302 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Any personal details would be covered under the data protection act. So the RSPCA would never be able to get that information. The police would need a warrant. So would need considerable evidence to get one. 2 Quote Link to post
Rabbit Hunter 6,613 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 As far as I know the dog was lost. It was handed to the vets by a member of the public with the collar on and working bites on it. The collar was traced back to the lad. A lad on here was there the day they lost the dog and can verify my story. 2 Quote Link to post
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Yes. A mate of mine lost a dog with a collar on. Days later he had either a phone call or a visit (can't remember which) saying his dog was at the vets and the collar was registered to him. This is fact not hearsay. Its a bit of a double edged sword that, great that your mates terrier was returned but I think theres a lot of lads would be pissed off at B&F handing over their details to police/rspca Quote Link to post
Rabbit Hunter 6,613 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 I know what you're saying mate but I don't think their aim was to re-unite dog with owner. I think it was to press forward with a prosecution. Quote Link to post
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 I know what you're saying mate but I don't think their aim was to re-unite dog with owner. I think it was to press forward with a prosecution. Makes it even worse, I wonder if the police did indeed have a warrant or if B&F just handed over the info, in future anyone buying from them might want to keep this in mind and buy stuff in their grans name lol Quote Link to post
Rabbit Hunter 6,613 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 It's certainly food for thought. Quote Link to post
marshman 7,758 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Lads let's not give anymore info out on how to trace stuff just a thought lol 4 Quote Link to post
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Lads let's not give anymore info out on how to trace stuff just a thought lol I think the horse has bolted on that 1 1 Quote Link to post
marshman 7,758 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Lads let's not give anymore info out on how to trace stuff just a thought lol I think the horse has bolted on that 1 True lol 1 Quote Link to post
Haiddheliwr 1,911 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 I am amazed that B+F has not condemned the RSPCA on their continuous accusations that their product is used in so called "Badger Baiting". Designs such as these are invaluable in the saving of countless lives human and animal! C'mon B+F stand up and be counted and be a voice for the countless people who have spent a lot of money purchasing your pricey products. This is just my honest opinion! 15 Quote Link to post
Francie 6,368 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 An a good one at that mate. 1 Quote Link to post
Boss-Hog 270 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 yea johno stand up put record straight /ome people can't have snitches in their company Quote Link to post
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted December 15, 2016 Report Share Posted December 15, 2016 Unfortunate set of events ,no more no less . Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.