Trial Of Britain First Terrorist Tommy Mair Starts

[DogFox123 1,379]

It was very convenient for the remainers and the perfect victim not some crusty old MP that everyone hates.

 

After watching the Soros funded leftist hate mobs running amock in the US during their election It wouldn't surprise me one tiny bit if this basket case wasn't being primed/encouraged by someone. I guess we'll never know but like I say....convenient and almost swung the referendum.

Fishier than Grimsby Docks.....

[BGD 6,436]

 

Can't argue with that, Mair really is a special kind of coward.

Oh well, he's going to die forgotten and alone in a jail cell now. A fitting end for such a cowardly lowlife IMO.

Would that definition of coward run to bombing kids in hospitals and schools........you know, the same type of bombing Jo Cox voted in favour of ?

Which bombings did she vote in favour of?

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

Can't argue with that, Mair really is a special kind of coward.

Oh well, he's going to die forgotten and alone in a jail cell now. A fitting end for such a cowardly lowlife IMO.

Would that definition of coward run to bombing kids in hospitals and schools........you know, the same type of bombing Jo Cox voted in favour of ?

Which bombings did she vote in favour of?

 

 

She supported some form of intervention in Syria, voted in favour of mass surveillance, supported open borders, voted against controls or cehcks on immigrants and immigration.

 

I'd say she was one of the 'useful idiots' a well meaning ideologue who inadvertently campaigning for bad things that destroy society and countries in the name of social justice.

 

This is how it works

[BGD 6,436]

So... none then.

 

Righto.

[Nik_B 3,790]

The White Helmets are a propaganda organisation funded by foreign countries, they're full of Jihadists and most are not relief workers, yet this useful idiot got suckered in hook line and sinker

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/12/jo-cox-white-helmets-peace-prize-coventry

[Nik_B 3,790]

So... none then.

 

Righto.

If you understood Syria and what is going on you would see she did support the civil war being prolonged even though she wouldn't have realised it.

[BGD 6,436]

 

 

So... none then.

 

Righto.

If you understood Syria and what is going on you would see she did support the civil war being prolonged even though she wouldn't have realised it.

I asked when she voted in favour of bombing kids in hospitals and schools (she never did), that's all.

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

So... none then.

 

Righto.

If you understood Syria and what is going on you would see she did support the civil war being prolonged even though she wouldn't have realised it.

I asked when she voted in favour of bombing kids in hospitals and schools (she never did), that's all.

 

 

It doesn't matter becasue arguably what she was doing, campaigning for the so called Syrian opposition etc and adding to the MSM lies of good rebels fighting off Assad could have eventually led to military intervention as happened with Libya. People like her are dangerous and it's people like her that have propagated 'humanitarian' reasons for invading and destroying entire nations.

 

She was a tiny unknowing cog in the machine but when they are in positions of power they are all the more dangerous....imagine if MPs believed the lies in the media on Libya and Syria and then voted on foreign policy based on those lies....it happens all the time....lowly MPs aren't privy to high level intelligence.

[Nik_B 3,790]

Soon after the establishment tried again for a 'no fly zone' which would have been the precursor to a bombing campaign just as happened in Libya

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/22/30-labour-mps-call-for-no-bombing-zones-in-syria-in-the-spirit-o/

[Nik_B 3,790]

While she abstained she said this

 

"I’m not against airstrikes in principle. In fact as part of an integrated strategy for Syria they are almost certainly a necessary part"

[BGD 6,436]

 

 

 

 

So... none then.

 

Righto.

If you understood Syria and what is going on you would see she did support the civil war being prolonged even though she wouldn't have realised it.

I asked when she voted in favour of bombing kids in hospitals and schools (she never did), that's all.

It doesn't matter becasue arguably what she was doing, campaigning for the so called Syrian opposition etc and adding to the MSM lies of good rebels fighting off Assad could have eventually led to military intervention as happened with Libya. People like her are dangerous and it's people like her that have propagated 'humanitarian' reasons for invading and destroying entire nations.

 

She was a tiny unknowing cog in the machine but when they are in positions of power they are all the more dangerous....imagine if MPs believed the lies in the media on Libya and Syria and then voted on foreign policy based on those lies....it happens all the time....lowly MPs aren't privy to high level intelligence.

It does matter when someone is trying to imply she's as much of a coward as the terrorist who murdered her because she voted for bombing children when she never did, that's the only reason it was even brought up.

 

You're obviously incredibly triggered and need to spray your conspiracy theories all over the place at the slightest mention of Syria, a strange condition to suffer from but you crack on with that

[BGD 6,436]

Bloody hell three posts in a row before I can even get a reply in

 

The subject obviously gets you really excited and emotional

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

 

 

So... none then.

 

Righto.

If you understood Syria and what is going on you would see she did support the civil war being prolonged even though she wouldn't have realised it.

I asked when she voted in favour of bombing kids in hospitals and schools (she never did), that's all.

It doesn't matter becasue arguably what she was doing, campaigning for the so called Syrian opposition etc and adding to the MSM lies of good rebels fighting off Assad could have eventually led to military intervention as happened with Libya. People like her are dangerous and it's people like her that have propagated 'humanitarian' reasons for invading and destroying entire nations.

 

She was a tiny unknowing cog in the machine but when they are in positions of power they are all the more dangerous....imagine if MPs believed the lies in the media on Libya and Syria and then voted on foreign policy based on those lies....it happens all the time....lowly MPs aren't privy to high level intelligence.

It does matter when someone is trying to imply she's as much of a coward as the terrorist who murdered her because she voted for bombing children when she never did, that's the only reason it was even brought up.

 

You're obviously incredibly triggered and need to spray your conspiracy theories all over the place at the slightest mention of Syria, a strange condition to suffer from but you crack on with that

 

 

Just because I know far more than you on the subject doesn't make it a conspiracy

 

Try reading a little and howabout visit some of these countries as I have done

[BGD 6,436]

Oh aye I've never been to the Middle East

 

You do like jumping to assumptions about folk you know nothing about don't you

[Nik_B 3,790]

Oh aye I've never been to the Middle East

 

You do like jumping to assumptions about folk you know nothing about don't you

 

Libya and Syria?