Joe1888 672 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 not a old timer like most of you, i enjoy reading the odd article in it... beats spending similar amount on the daily record 1 Quote Link to post
Casso 1,261 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 As far as I can see you'd find enough on here to chance your arm writing an article on it , find a topic pack it out a bit and bobs your uncle ? I'm sure a recent post disscussion off here end up as an article on it 4 Quote Link to post
gwalchmai4110 1,758 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 i write for the countrymans weekly from time to time. i find a few articles in there worth the read, sky cat stuff is always on the money , darcy also puts a few good articles in there. just appears everyone is a critic....... there are some cracking accounts of hunting on here from time to time if a few more keen lads penned a couple of articles for publishing then it can only be a good thing. obviously there is only certain things you can write about in this day and age and this is a pity but unfortunately thats the world we live in im afraid atb 3 Quote Link to post
scottish lurcher 185 Posted October 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 (edited) Is there anyone on this forum assocated with this magazine ? As I would love to know if they will be will ever be doing any features on why the law should be changed for hare coursing ,as I feel they seem to sit on the fenceWrite an article and submit to them. it's a pity maybe one of the lurcher groups couldn't could produce a magazine , dedicate to the working lurcher bet they would sell loads and profits could go to help guys who find them in scrap we the law ect . But Iam from the alf garnet Era Edited October 13, 2016 by scottish lurcher 2 Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 Some of the fantasy story's some of the lads write on here would be good if 40% of it was true lol 3 Quote Link to post
keepitcovert 842 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 Simple answer is if you dont like it dont buy it, but bear in mind its a pro hunting mag and in this day and age we need all the friends we can get. I know plenty of people that read it but claim to be too hardcore to buy it, kind of get the feeling that applies to a lot of people on this site. 1 Quote Link to post
boyo 1,398 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 Casso. Ive noticed that a few times of late??!! My wife bought me a subsription last birthday ? Thankfully nearly over!! One of my mates told her i'd like it .. the twat ? Atb 3 Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 It seems to be very anti poaching and was lurcher not a poachers dog at one time Quote Link to post
johnpee 214 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 I read it every week without fail. Some weeks it's utter shit some weeks it has a few good reads in it. Just like this site and most others some good reads some utter shit. Each to ther Own horses for courses and all that 3 Quote Link to post
green dragon 701 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 (edited) i write for the countrymans weekly from time to time. i find a few articles in there worth the read, sky cat stuff is always on the money , darcy also puts a few good articles in there. just appears everyone is a critic....... there are some cracking accounts of hunting on here from time to time if a few more keen lads penned a couple of articles for publishing then it can only be a good thing. obviously there is only certain things you can write about in this day and age and this is a pity but unfortunately thats the world we live in im afraid atb Always enjoy your articles mate this weeks was agood one about barney the fox hound lurcher im not a big reader but allways get into your write ups Edited October 13, 2016 by green dragon 2 Quote Link to post
forest of dean redneck 11,703 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 It seems to be very anti poaching and was lurcher not a poachers dog at one time No never ,poachers all used greyhounds an cast off gun dogs,with guns so I read. Quote Link to post
The one 8,503 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 They must be short of topics if you read it ,its like reading the posts on here Quote Link to post
northern lad 2,292 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 Casso. Ive noticed that a few times of late??!! My wife bought me a subsription last birthday Thankfully nearly over!! One of my mates told her i'd like it .. the twat Atb Hope your a bit more enthusiastic about the Countryfile Calendar youre getting for Christmas lol 6 Quote Link to post
peterhunter86 8,627 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 It seems to be very anti poaching and was lurcher not a poachers dog at one timeNo never ,poachers all used greyhounds an cast off gun dogs,with guns so I read. Was reason lurcher was bred to take the greyhound look off the dog when only the gentry were allowed hunt with them. Quote Link to post
Casso 1,261 Posted October 13, 2016 Report Share Posted October 13, 2016 Casso. Ive noticed that a few times of late??!! My wife bought me a subsription last birthday ? Thankfully nearly over!! One of my mates told her i'd like it .. the twat ? Atb There's not much else out there bud unfortunately , I always have an interest in dogs and countryside activities so it occupies a few minutes in a newsagent , It's the potential of finding something really interesting in it and maybe at my age having seen and done a far bit , the run of the mill stuff leaves me a little disappointed, in fairness it must be difficult to keep it fresh when your just writing to get something out there Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.