Jump to content

Syria, Who's Right And Who's Wrong?


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

personally I think the west is arming every raving looney in the desert to overthrow Assad without getting there hands dirty, and Russia are helping an elected leader as written in most of the war law

The Middle East has thousands of years of tribal and family allegiances. Through marriage , political or military superiority. it is the way of the Society. The low levels of Education in Saudia one

The middle east is a bloody complicated place. Yes, to the outsider, the people are basic and simple but, they operate on a system of morals and honour that has become alien to us now.   Of course

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.
Does that work both ways then.....

 

Is it only Assad and the Russians killing innocent civilians?????

 

The Americans are not quite so pinpoint accurate as you might think...

Where did I say they were? Where have I said I support the Americans over the Russians and Assad? Like I said I've got no dog in this fight.

 

Good to see you've finally accepted Assad and Russia are killing innocent civilians though :thumbs:

 

Now maybe you can give a straight answer to this - is Assad a strongman dictator or a beloved elected leader? I'm still not entirely sure which you actually believe to be the case, you seem to change your mind on a post by post basis.

Edited by BGD
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?

So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.

 

Nationals of a country have the right to determine its Soveriegn affairs without outside interference,Examples of outside interference Lybia . Iraq, Afghanistan. Yemen Syria the conflicts fermented and Armed by Western Governments and their munitions suppliers thats ok then is it? Let Independent Soveriegn states and their citizens solve their own issues. You know like UK had a referendum to come out of Europe to Govern itself

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.
Does that work both ways then.....

 

Is it only Assad and the Russians killing innocent civilians?????

 

The Americans are not quite so pinpoint accurate as you might think...

Where did I say they were? Where have I said I support the Americans over the Russians and Assad? Like I said I've got no dog in this fight.

 

Good to see you've finally accepted Assad and Russia are killing innocent civilians though :thumbs:

 

Now maybe you can give a straight answer to this - is Assad a strongman dictator or a beloved elected leader? I'm still not entirely sure which you actually believe to be the case, you seem to change your mind on a post by post basis.

Is civilian death a new concept in warfare then?

 

Are western powers also killing innocent civilians in Syria also???

 

Well that depends which side you look at it from does it not? I've aways stated he's the lesser of two evils.

 

So what is your point in this topic, to nitpick wether I think he's a dictator or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.
Does that work both ways then.....

 

Is it only Assad and the Russians killing innocent civilians?????

 

The Americans are not quite so pinpoint accurate as you might think...

Where did I say they were? Where have I said I support the Americans over the Russians and Assad? Like I said I've got no dog in this fight.

 

Good to see you've finally accepted Assad and Russia are killing innocent civilians though :thumbs:

 

Now maybe you can give a straight answer to this - is Assad a strongman dictator or a beloved elected leader? I'm still not entirely sure which you actually believe to be the case, you seem to change your mind on a post by post basis.

Is civilian death a new concept in warfare then?

 

Are western powers also killing innocent civilians in Syria also???

 

Well that depends which side you look at it from does it not? I've aways stated he's the lesser of two evils.

 

So what is your point in this topic, to nitpick wether I think he's a dictator or not?

That'll be a no on the straight answer then :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.
Does that work both ways then.....

 

Is it only Assad and the Russians killing innocent civilians?????

 

The Americans are not quite so pinpoint accurate as you might think...

Where did I say they were? Where have I said I support the Americans over the Russians and Assad? Like I said I've got no dog in this fight.

 

Good to see you've finally accepted Assad and Russia are killing innocent civilians though :thumbs:

 

Now maybe you can give a straight answer to this - is Assad a strongman dictator or a beloved elected leader? I'm still not entirely sure which you actually believe to be the case, you seem to change your mind on a post by post basis.

Is civilian death a new concept in warfare then?

 

Are western powers also killing innocent civilians in Syria also???

 

Well that depends which side you look at it from does it not? I've aways stated he's the lesser of two evils.

 

So what is your point in this topic, to nitpick wether I think he's a dictator or not?

That'll be a no on the straight answer then :thumbs:

There is no straight answer, he's labeled a dictator in the west so I called him one, wow......

 

Now answer my questions on some points that are actually relevant....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.

Nationals of a country have the right to determine its Soveriegn affairs without outside interference,Examples of outside interference Lybia . Iraq, Afghanistan. Yemen Syria the conflicts fermented and Armed by Western Governments and their munitions suppliers thats ok then is it? Let Independent Soveriegn states and their citizens solve their own issues. You know like UK had a referendum to come out of Europe to Govern itself

Agreed, Assad should hold free and fair elections so the nationals can determine their own soveriegn affairs without outside interference :thumbs:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.
Does that work both ways then.....

 

Is it only Assad and the Russians killing innocent civilians?????

 

The Americans are not quite so pinpoint accurate as you might think...

Where did I say they were? Where have I said I support the Americans over the Russians and Assad? Like I said I've got no dog in this fight.

 

Good to see you've finally accepted Assad and Russia are killing innocent civilians though :thumbs:

 

Now maybe you can give a straight answer to this - is Assad a strongman dictator or a beloved elected leader? I'm still not entirely sure which you actually believe to be the case, you seem to change your mind on a post by post basis.

Is civilian death a new concept in warfare then?

 

Are western powers also killing innocent civilians in Syria also???

 

Well that depends which side you look at it from does it not? I've aways stated he's the lesser of two evils.

 

So what is your point in this topic, to nitpick wether I think he's a dictator or not?

That'll be a no on the straight answer then :thumbs:
There is no straight answer, he's labeled a dictator in the west so I called him one, wow......

 

Now answer my questions on some points that are actually relevant....

I asked what you believe him to be, if there's no straight answer to that question you obviously don't even know your own mind...

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.

Nationals of a country have the right to determine its Soveriegn affairs without outside interference,Examples of outside interference Lybia . Iraq, Afghanistan. Yemen Syria the conflicts fermented and Armed by Western Governments and their munitions suppliers thats ok then is it? Let Independent Soveriegn states and their citizens solve their own issues. You know like UK had a referendum to come out of Europe to Govern itself

Agreed, Assad should hold free and fair elections so the nationals can determine their own soveriegn affairs without outside interference :thumbs:

 

Stick to Western politics and Corbyn/labour party your out of your depth in Middle Eastern affairs, especially the

concept of western democracy being implemented in a tribal based region.

Edited by desertbred
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.

Nationals of a country have the right to determine its Soveriegn affairs without outside interference,Examples of outside interference Lybia . Iraq, Afghanistan. Yemen Syria the conflicts fermented and Armed by Western Governments and their munitions suppliers thats ok then is it? Let Independent Soveriegn states and their citizens solve their own issues. You know like UK had a referendum to come out of Europe to Govern itself
Agreed, Assad should hold free and fair elections so the nationals can determine their own soveriegn affairs without outside interference :thumbs:

Stick to Western politics and Corbyn/labour party your out of your depth in Middle Eastern affairs, especially the

concept of western democracy being implemented in a tribal based region.

According to DogFox Assad has already held elections and won them so sounds like Western democracy has already been implemented over there, I'm just saying he should renew his mandate :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's good for Syria and Europe as a dictator or not, what do you think???

 

Answer the question...

So you think he's done a good job of keeping Syria stable?

 

I think he's failed at that personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The narrative you're pushing in this thread is incredibly contradictory, first he's a strongman dictator keeping hold of power by cracking down on the population with an iron fist and then he's a beloved elected leader with the support of huge swathes of the population, which is it?

The western world likes to call him a dictator don't they?

 

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter....

You were calling him a dictator yourself earlier in the thread! You really need to make your mind up.

 

Who do you think has killed more of the Syrian population, Assad and Russia or ISIS?

Who has more legitimate right to be in Syria Assad or the outside forces ?
So leveling cities and wiping out civilian populations is perfectly fine as long as whoever is doing it has a "legitimate right" to be in the country, righto.

Nationals of a country have the right to determine its Soveriegn affairs without outside interference,Examples of outside interference Lybia . Iraq, Afghanistan. Yemen Syria the conflicts fermented and Armed by Western Governments and their munitions suppliers thats ok then is it? Let Independent Soveriegn states and their citizens solve their own issues. You know like UK had a referendum to come out of Europe to Govern itself
Agreed, Assad should hold free and fair elections so the nationals can determine their own soveriegn affairs without outside interference :thumbs:

Stick to Western politics and Corbyn/labour party your out of your depth in Middle Eastern affairs, especially the

concept of western democracy being implemented in a tribal based region.

According to DogFox Assad has already held elections and won them so sounds like Western democracy has already been implemented over there, I'm just saying he should renew his mandate :thumbs:

Did Syria or not have elections in 2014 or not, quick question???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...