Ethnics In The Countryside

[ChrisJones 7,975]

just like the way your talking to me now???, I'm not in any strange country, and if I was I'd live by their rules and not try to change it. But equally if I was unhappy I'd move to where I was happy. I agreed with Axum.

If it's good for the goose, right?

 

For those that have grown up here, been born here, what makes it a strange country for them?

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

 

 

since when has a man of African decent been native of Australia ??

We're all of African decent if you don't use Tippex on your family tree!

an opinion not proven

If it was proven would you change your way of thinking 100%

nope, I was born in a white country, and like the thoughts of keeping it native, not like the multicultural shambles you see all over the mainland

[stealthy1 3,964]

Alf Garnett will be turning in his grave.

[BGD 6,436]

 

 

 

Len demonstrating he has no idea what the Commonwealth is

bollix, I know exactly what it is, easy for the blm activists crying about being taken into slavery, well they're free since slavery was abolished and how many took they're right to return home???, prob none. Why? Because Europeans showed them a better way of life

"there's nothing holding any unhappy ethnics in the common wealth they're al free to return to they're ancestral lands, but choose not too."

Their ancestral lands are part of the Commonwealth so how exactly do they leave the Commonwealth and return to their ancestral land?

since when has a man of African decent been native of Australia ??

As I said, demonstrating you have no fecking idea what the Commonwealth is :laugh:

[ChrisJones 7,975]

an opinion not proven

 

Empirical evidence. Race is 100% to do with melanin levels in the skin.

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

just like the way your talking to me now???, I'm not in any strange country, and if I was I'd live by their rules and not try to change it. But equally if I was unhappy I'd move to where I was happy. I agreed with Axum.

 

If it's good for the goose, right?

 

For those that have grown up here, been born here, what makes it a strange country for them?

like Dave the Norwegian? The Muslim terrorist that killed people because he didn't like them or white non believers in the Middle East??

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

an opinion not proven

 

Empirical evidence. Race is 100% to do with melanin levels in the skin.

more than just skin colour.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

more than just skin colour.

 

Is it? How so?

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

more than just skin colour.

 

Is it? How so?

why do they make better distance runners? Or better heavyweight fighters? Or poor swimmers, more than just skin colour. The size of they're nostrils compared to thinner colder climate natives. What have they ever built of they're own accord that lasts millennia ?? More than just skin colour.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

like Dave the Norwegian? The Muslim terrorist that killed people because he didn't like them or white non believers in the Middle East??

 

I was thinking more along of the lines of the 4-5 generations of non-white Brits that probably can't pick where their great-great-great-great-great grandfather came from, on a map. The ones that get up and go to work/school everyday with their mates.

 

Like I said earlier, if you don't use Tippex on your family tree you'll find you come from somewhere near Sudan. I guess racial superiority depends purely on how far back you want to go, into history.

Edited October 8, 2016 by ChrisJones

[ChrisJones 7,975]

why do they make better distance runners? Or better heavyweight fighters? Or poor swimmers, more than just skin colour. The size of they're nostrils compared to thinner colder climate natives. What have they ever built of they're own accord that lasts millennia ?? More than just skin colour.

Millenia of human interaction and breeding can cause any number of mutations that favour/hinder individuals in many situations.

 

Skin colour is caused by levels of melanin in the skin. What about world champion white runners? Boxers? Swimmers? What gives them a genetic advantage, racially?

 

Len. What contributions have you made to benefit society in the last 20 years?

Edited October 8, 2016 by ChrisJones

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

why do they make better distance runners? Or better heavyweight fighters? Or poor swimmers, more than just skin colour. The size of they're nostrils compared to thinner colder climate natives. What have they ever built of they're own accord that lasts millennia ?? More than just skin colour.

Millenia of human interaction and breeding can cause any number of mutations that favour/hinder individuals in many situations.Skin colour is caused by levels of melanin in the skin. What about world champion white runners? Boxers? Swimmers? What gives them a genetic advantage, racially?Len. What contributions have you made to benefit society in the last 20 years?

well as for your distance runners look at the we bush tribe that run they're prey to exhaustion in Africa and tell me how many white men could do that in the heat of Africa?? None. So is that just pigmentation difference. Same as dogs, yes they eat meat and are binocular vision predators, but are not all the same. But can breed with each other, but a basset hound ain't gonna beat a greyhound in a sprint

[ChrisJones 7,975]

well as for your distance runners look at the we bush tribe that run they're prey to exhaustion in Africa and tell me how many white men could do that in the heat of Africa?? None. So is that just pigmentation difference. Same as dogs, yes they eat meat and are binocular vision predators, but are not all the same. But can breed with each other, but a basset hound ain't gonna beat a greyhound in a sprint

 

I'm still trying to understand how you're equating skin pigmentation with athletic superiority in certain fields. Again genetic variances are going to help/hinder different people in different situations.

 

Dogs is a fantastic example. Yes they all eat meat, yes they're binocular vision predators, yes they can breed with each other but it's exactly because of those genetic mutations, over hundreds of years, that has given one type an advantage over the other.

 

You only missed the conclusion that they're all dogs. Canis familiaris. Same way we're all Homo sapiens and that race, as you refer to it, is purely down to the level of melanin in the skin.

 

Be honest. If you see a white guy swim faster and longer than everyone else, you'd say "What A Fantastic Athlete" but if he wasn't white you'd say "He Has A Genetic Advantage Because He's Black." The reality is that both examples have a genetic advantage, at whatever you're witnessing, it's how you're perceiving the outcome on your preconceived bias.

 

Back to your dog analogy. You have a white greyhound, and black greyhound. Is the black one going to be automatically physically superior based on the melanin in it's hair?

Edited October 8, 2016 by ChrisJones

[Lenmcharristar 9,802]

 

well as for your distance runners look at the we bush tribe that run they're prey to exhaustion in Africa and tell me how many white men could do that in the heat of Africa?? None. So is that just pigmentation difference. Same as dogs, yes they eat meat and are binocular vision predators, but are not all the same. But can breed with each other, but a basset hound ain't gonna beat a greyhound in a sprint

 

I'm still trying to understand how you're equating skin pigmentation with athletic superiority in certain fields. Again genetic variances are going to help/hinder different people in different situations.

 

Dogs is a fantastic example. Yes they all eat meat, yes they're binocular vision predators, yes they can breed with each other but it's exactly because of those genetic mutations, over hundreds of years, that has given one type an advantage over the other.

 

You only missed the conclusion that they're all dogs. Canis familiaris. Same way we're all Homo sapiens and that race, as you refer to it, is purely down to the level of melanin in the skin.

 

Be honest. If you see a white guy swim faster and longer than everyone else, you'd say "What A Fantastic Athlete" but if he wasn't white you'd say "He Has A Genetic Advantage Because He's Black." The reality is that both examples have a genetic advantage, at whatever you're witnessing, it's how you're perceiving the outcome on your preconceived bias.

 

Back to your dog analogy. You have a white greyhound, and black greyhound. Is the black one going to be automatically physically superior based on the melanin in it's hair?

your the one saying we're all the same, not me. I believe there's differences more than just colour of skin. Even a mutation means we're not all the same

[ChrisJones 7,975]

your the one saying we're all the same, not me. I believe there's differences more than just colour of skin. Even a mutation means we're not all the same

 

 

All these examples you've given as examples of racial superiority/inferiority are non starters. The advantage of dark skin is protection from the suns rays. The advantage of white skin is that it absorbs Vitamin D from sunlight. Paler skin is more prevalent the further you move from the equator because of the inclement weather. The fact that you tan in sunlight is your bodies response to elevated levels of Vitamin D and it's actually a protection mechanism that regulates how much sunlight you should absorb. That's why you will burn, and Axum won't but it's also why Axum might have to take Vitamin D supplements and you won't, based on current geography.

 

Race is 100% down to melanin in the skin. Nothing more. Nothing less.