Astanley 11,568 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 That's a fearsome scowl your sporting Tomo ,has Whin just joined you for a day on the big land or something ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 26,214 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 It's these fecking guests with cameras,,,either they catch me eating,,or not smiling ,,,am a happy person really,,,honest,,lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Astanley 11,568 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 It's these fecking guests with cameras,,,either they catch me eating,,or not smiling ,,,am a happy person really,,,honest,,lol You look really happy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 If you want,but it's like agreeing to disagree about the existence of gravity. The difference between what we're attempting to argue is political. You're coming from a Victorian era perspective, I'm trying to show you that your preconceived biases aren't very important in the grand scheme of things. Your entire argument appears to be a direct cut and paste from St*rmfr*nt, so I deduce that you're either an active member or an avid reader? Either way you're giving race way more credence when it's simply based on geography. Sorry to mention your deeply held convictions but it's really that simple. We're all related and if you genuinely equate race with intelligence then you'd be wise to remember that you're a direct descendant from the people you appear to despise. Race isn't important. Unlike gravity, my African brother! Stormfront's a political/news site,not really an educational site. Race is biological reality,IQ is inherited and the average IQ of different races varies greatly and correlates directly with the brain size of the group,we have different immunity's to different diseases and we are anatomically different. All of this is demonstrably correct. Personality is also largely inherited,likely explaining why our societies are so different. It doesn't fit your bias,but I'm sure you can come to terms with it given time. TRIGGER WARNING! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 If you want,but it's like agreeing to disagree about the existence of gravity. The difference between what we're attempting to argue is political. You're coming from a Victorian era perspective, I'm trying to show you that your preconceived biases aren't very important in the grand scheme of things. Your entire argument appears to be a direct cut and paste from St*rmfr*nt, so I deduce that you're either an active member or an avid reader? Either way you're giving race way more credence when it's simply based on geography. Sorry to mention your deeply held convictions but it's really that simple. We're all related and if you genuinely equate race with intelligence then you'd be wise to remember that you're a direct descendant from the people you appear to despise. Race isn't important. Unlike gravity, my African brother! Stormfront's a political/news site,not really an educational site. Race is biological reality,IQ is inherited and the average IQ of different races varies greatly and correlates directly with the brain size of the group,we have different immunity's to different diseases and we are anatomically different. All of this is demonstrably correct. Personality is also largely inherited,likely explaining why our societies are so different. It doesn't fit your bias,but I'm sure you can come to terms with it given time. TRIGGER WARNING! So far you've provided one paper with a ridiculously small sample size and a few graphs with no context, that makes your thesis demonstrably, unquestionably correct does it? The inherent aspects of IQ and the nature/nurture question are still very much an open debate but you've found a study that confirms your already held biases so it's "demonstrably correct " :laugh: 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 Why do labour voters have tiny brains and bad personal hygiene? Is that nature or nurture? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 If you want,but it's like agreeing to disagree about the existence of gravity. The difference between what we're attempting to argue is political. You're coming from a Victorian era perspective, I'm trying to show you that your preconceived biases aren't very important in the grand scheme of things. Your entire argument appears to be a direct cut and paste from St*rmfr*nt, so I deduce that you're either an active member or an avid reader? Either way you're giving race way more credence when it's simply based on geography. Sorry to mention your deeply held convictions but it's really that simple. We're all related and if you genuinely equate race with intelligence then you'd be wise to remember that you're a direct descendant from the people you appear to despise. Race isn't important. Unlike gravity, my African brother! Stormfront's a political/news site,not really an educational site. Race is biological reality,IQ is inherited and the average IQ of different races varies greatly and correlates directly with the brain size of the group,we have different immunity's to different diseases and we are anatomically different. All of this is demonstrably correct. Personality is also largely inherited,likely explaining why our societies are so different. It doesn't fit your bias,but I'm sure you can come to terms with it given time. TRIGGER WARNING! So far you've provided one paper with a ridiculously small sample size and a few graphs with no context, that makes your thesis demonstrably, unquestionably correct does it? The inherent aspects of IQ and the nature/nurture question are still very much an open debate but you've found a study that confirms your already held biases so it's "demonstrably correct " :laugh: IQ is 60% nature and 40% nurture, so culture will play a f**king huge part in a debate. Intelligence is about much more than IQ level anyway, there are many different types of intelligence.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 If you want,but it's like agreeing to disagree about the existence of gravity. The difference between what we're attempting to argue is political. You're coming from a Victorian era perspective, I'm trying to show you that your preconceived biases aren't very important in the grand scheme of things. Your entire argument appears to be a direct cut and paste from St*rmfr*nt, so I deduce that you're either an active member or an avid reader? Either way you're giving race way more credence when it's simply based on geography. Sorry to mention your deeply held convictions but it's really that simple. We're all related and if you genuinely equate race with intelligence then you'd be wise to remember that you're a direct descendant from the people you appear to despise. Race isn't important. Unlike gravity, my African brother! Stormfront's a political/news site,not really an educational site. Race is biological reality,IQ is inherited and the average IQ of different races varies greatly and correlates directly with the brain size of the group,we have different immunity's to different diseases and we are anatomically different. All of this is demonstrably correct. Personality is also largely inherited,likely explaining why our societies are so different. It doesn't fit your bias,but I'm sure you can come to terms with it given time. TRIGGER WARNING! So far you've provided one paper with a ridiculously small sample size and a few graphs with no context, that makes your thesis demonstrably, unquestionably correct does it? The inherent aspects of IQ and the nature/nurture question are still very much an open debate but you've found a study that confirms your already held biases so it's "demonstrably correct " :laugh: The evidence is what gives me any bias. You've got me I pulled these out my hoop.... But check these if you want: Pearce, E. & Dunbar, R. (2011). Latitudinal Variation in Light Levels Drives Human Visual System Size. Biology Letters. Published online before print. Rushton, J. P. & Ankney, C. D. (1996). Brain Size and Cognitive Ability: Correlations with Age, Sex, Social Class, and Race.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 21-26. Lynn, R. Race Differences in Intelligence. Washington Summit Publishers, 2006. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. IQ & Global Inequality. Washington Summit Publishers, 2006. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 Bonus points for naming today's logical fallacy! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 like Dave the Norwegian? The Muslim terrorist that killed people because he didn't like them or white non believers in the Middle East?? I was thinking more along of the lines of the 4-5 generations of non-white Brits that probably can't pick where their great-great-great-great-great grandfather came from, on a map. The ones that get up and go to work/school everyday with their mates. Like I said earlier, if you don't use Tippex on your family tree you'll find you come from somewhere near Sudan. I guess racial superiority depends purely on how far back you want to go, into history. That's a THEORY that I believe a lot are now challenging I've read we may have evolved in Russia Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 your the one saying we're all the same, not me. I believe there's differences more than just colour of skin. Even a mutation means we're not all the same Race is 100% down to melanin in the skin. Nothing more. Nothing less. I thought Europeans all had a percentage of Neanderthal dna that Africans dont as I understand it Neanderthals are a different species to homo sapiens so I make you wrong 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 Bonus points for naming today's logical fallacy! Could it be confirmation bias? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 Is a bream the same as a roach then? Theyre both fish they both share common ancestory and they can breed together. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 Is a bream the same as a roach then? Theyre both fish they both share common ancestory and they can breed together. Yes. It's just the colour that's different....apparently. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,161 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Share Posted October 10, 2016 No ones White you say......you've clearly never met mushroom ,,,,,lol C'mon Tomo,.your head was, as white as the driven snow,..until I Hired you one of my expensive caps.... Aint that minty off eastenders ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.