Jump to content

Ethnics In The Countryside


Recommended Posts

Sickle cell anemia provides some resistance to malaria that's why it's more prevalent in communities in areas where malaria is present, it's not a "black disease" at all many different races can have it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I bred a litter of ferrets about 4 year ago..and a mixed race lad came for some,,,he was from Lancashire ,,or Manchester way if I remember right,,,I think he comes on here,,but keeps out of all the di

Some clever stuff on here regarding origin of our species and such but no one seems to have mentioned the possible existence of sub-species of humans still living today in remote areas. The Sasquatch

My kids are mixed race 7 of them my one lad is really bang into his lurchers terriers fishing etc couple the other lads drift in & out but I've shown them all what I do the girls could all skin a

Posted Images

Apart from DB on here I don't know of any blacks, Asians, Chinese, Indians etc that hunt or farm or generally work in the countryside or are affiliated with country sports ... Why do you think this is ? Is it because the ethnic community predominantly reside in city's or that their culture just isn't into hunting etc ... What do you lot think ??? .......

I lost some permission in the Dales to a couple of Seikhs out of Leeds many years ago,they were ferreting mad and useful at it.Years later,when i had no transport,a couple of Pakistani,s drove us up to the Dales and said the odd prayer and slit the throat of many a catch we made.Even later down the line the Pakistani,s,especially around the Lancashire area have become some of the finest exponents of Saluki bred Coursing stock.The main reason we don,t know about them is often because we are not in the know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'd suggest you do the same,the info's all out there.

 

http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

 

So... intelligence IS inherited!

 

and...

 

I refer the honourable gentlemen to the response I gave earlier

 

 

 

 

Sorry,I forgot the trigger warning

 

I should be more careful when posting hate facts.

:laugh:

 

This is important for 2 reasons,firstly so we can debunk the narrative of the poor oppressed minority (pushed as much by white and Jewish Marxists as anyone else) and so that we realise we are different and unique groups,not interchangeable and both should have the right to self determination and the securing of their own nations.

 

Not to needlessly harass or put one group down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Race is 100% down to the melanin levels in the skin.

 

If you want to talk about cultural and ideological differences. Wax lyrical about what's wrong with the world, that's fair enough. Probably better in another thread though.

 

But race is purely down to the melanin levels in the skin.

 

post-22-0-94156500-1476038568.jpg

 

This is how melanin is distributed geographically. As you can clearly see it's at it's densest by the equator and gets lighter the further you move away. I don't know how else to explain something so ridiculously simple as this. :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If the only difference between races is skin pigment, how come different races can get different diseases. Sickle cell anaemia is the first one that comes to mind. I don't think white people can get that. Might be miles off the mark though.

 

Genetic variations within the species. Same way you're more likely to get skin cancer than someone of African descent. Evolution isn't perfect. It's not survival of the fittest it's survival of the most adaptable. It's the same concept as health conditions in dogs that you can see. Blindness in dalmatians, hip dysplasia in other breeds. Some are more susceptible than others but they're still dogs.

 

 

I wasn't starting an argument, I'm genuinely interested.

 

I'm more likely to get skin cancer because I have fairer skin than an African. That's purely down to skin pigmentation. The sickle cell thing I used as an example can't be down to skin pigmentation.

 

The thing that stands out to me from your analogy is the dogs in question might still be dogs, but they aren't both dalmatians. If that makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Race is 100% down to the melanin levels in the skin.

 

If you want to talk about cultural and ideological differences. Wax lyrical about what's wrong with the world, that's fair enough. Probably better in another thread though.

 

But race is purely down to the melanin levels in the skin.

 

attachicon.gifmelanin1.jpg

 

This is how melanin is distributed geographically. As you can clearly see it's at it's densest by the equator and gets lighter the further you move away. I don't know how else to explain something so ridiculously simple as this. :laugh:

 

No,no,no.

 

Melanin is 1 of many differences.

I...a humble pleb,can easily identify the skull of a Negroid,Mongoloid or Caucasoid.

I can rattle of the different diseases we're predisposed to and our relative IQ scores,in fact I can tell you with a great degree of accuracy which group has the bigger brain purely by the average IQ scores.

 

Problematic...I know.

But a fact's a fact,even when it's a hate fact :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't starting an argument, I'm genuinely interested.

 

I'm more likely to get skin cancer because I have fairer skin than an African. That's purely down to skin pigmentation. The sickle cell thing I used as an example can't be down to skin pigmentation.

 

The thing that stands out to me from your analogy is the dogs in question might still be dogs, but they aren't both dalmatians. If that makes sense.

 

No worries Walshie, if it came across as argumentative it wasn't intentional.

 

BGD mentioned sickle cell having resistance to malaria. That I honestly don't know but sickle cell distribution, across the globe, does tie in with malaria hotspots.

 

The dog analogy is a poor one. I don't have the vocabulary to break technical manuals down for the forum. Human beings are far more complex, genetically, than dogs. Modern dogs are products of selective breeding, whereas humans are products of natural selection in our respective environments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No,no,no.

 

Melanin is 1 of many differences.

I...a humble pleb,can easily identify the skull of a Negroid,Mongoloid or Caucasoid.

I can rattle of the different diseases we're predisposed to and our relative IQ scores,in fact I can tell you with a great degree of accuracy which group has the bigger brain purely by the average IQ scores.

 

Problematic...I know.

But a fact's a fact,even when it's a hate fact :thumbs:

 

WRONG! :)

Edited by ChrisJones
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No,no,no.

 

Melanin is 1 of many differences.

I...a humble pleb,can easily identify the skull of a Negroid,Mongoloid or Caucasoid.

I can rattle of the different diseases we're predisposed to and our relative IQ scores,in fact I can tell you with a great degree of accuracy which group has the bigger brain purely by the average IQ scores.

 

Problematic...I know.

But a fact's a fact,even when it's a hate fact :thumbs:

 

WRONG! :)

 

 

Nope,all correct and demonstrably so!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I wasn't starting an argument, I'm genuinely interested.

 

I'm more likely to get skin cancer because I have fairer skin than an African. That's purely down to skin pigmentation. The sickle cell thing I used as an example can't be down to skin pigmentation.

 

The thing that stands out to me from your analogy is the dogs in question might still be dogs, but they aren't both dalmatians. If that makes sense.

 

No worries Walshie, if it came across as argumentative it wasn't intentional.

 

BGD mentioned sickle cell having resistance to malaria. That I honestly don't know but sickle cell distribution, across the globe, does tie in with malaria hotspots.

 

The dog analogy is a poor one. I don't have the vocabulary to break technical manuals down for the forum. Human beings are far more complex, genetically, than dogs. Modern dogs are products of selective breeding, whereas humans are products of natural selection in our respective environments.

 

 

 

I didn't mean you were argumentative. :thumbs:

 

I'm sure you know a million times more about the subject than I do, so i bow to your knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't mean you were argumentative. :thumbs:

 

I'm sure you know a million times more about the subject than I do, so i bow to your knowledge.

 

I doubt that, I just have the time to read stuff. I live out in the middle of nowhere and my internet connection is spotty at best. When it's -20 outside and there's a couple of feet of snow there's not much else to do.

 

I'm not a complete recluse and I know that race is more important to some, than others. When you break it down, though, it isn't. It's purely down to how far your ancestors lived from the equator! :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...