Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time?We are growing as a species, probably due to improved nutrition and medical care. That's population growth, not e voloution mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time? The top end of people may be getting more intelligent etc (possibly),but the fact we're on the whole getting weaker and stupider doesn't disprove evolution,there is almost no selective pressure for those traits in a liberal,civilised society. All that's required is that you can eventually conceive and give birth,with as much assistance as you could possibly want to do even that. Well I think it's logical to say that it does disprove it, it's the complete opposite from evo? Evolution isn't a linear progression. Selective pressure is what drives it,our selective pressures haven't just stagnated,they've almost all been removed. That means that new and unhelpful mutations that pop up aren't culled,and make it into the gene pool,slowly dragging us all down. I know this won't sink in anyway,but there's always hope It sinks in mate, lol but I don't think it's true, which selective pressure have been taken away, an how would that disable e voloution, an how come this didn't happen in the past? So this is to e voloution lads, what do you think we're going to end up like, say a millions years?☺ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 We will all end up living in chinese run concentration camps lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Hehe now that's evolution mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
delswal 3,819 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time? The top end of people may be getting more intelligent etc (possibly),but the fact we're on the whole getting weaker and stupider doesn't disprove evolution,there is almost no selective pressure for those traits in a liberal,civilised society. All that's required is that you can eventually conceive and give birth,with as much assistance as you could possibly want to do even that. Well I think it's logical to say that it does disprove it, it's the complete opposite from evo? Evolution isn't a linear progression. Selective pressure is what drives it,our selective pressures haven't just stagnated,they've almost all been removed. That means that new and unhelpful mutations that pop up aren't culled,and make it into the gene pool,slowly dragging us all down. I know this won't sink in anyway,but there's always hope It sinks in mate, lol but I don't think it's true, which selective pressure have been taken away, an how would that disable e voloution, an how come this didn't happen in the past? So this is to e voloution lads, what do you think we're going to end up like, say a millions years?☺ We might be 9ft tall and live to 900 years old, oops sorry the bible says we've been there already with Noah, if that's the case we are not really evolving at all are we? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time? The top end of people may be getting more intelligent etc (possibly),but the fact we're on the whole getting weaker and stupider doesn't disprove evolution,there is almost no selective pressure for those traits in a liberal,civilised society. All that's required is that you can eventually conceive and give birth,with as much assistance as you could possibly want to do even that. Well I think it's logical to say that it does disprove it, it's the complete opposite from evo? Evolution isn't a linear progression. Selective pressure is what drives it,our selective pressures haven't just stagnated,they've almost all been removed. That means that new and unhelpful mutations that pop up aren't culled,and make it into the gene pool,slowly dragging us all down. I know this won't sink in anyway,but there's always hope It sinks in mate, lol but I don't think it's true, which selective pressure have been taken away, an how would that disable e voloution, an how come this didn't happen in the past? So this is to e voloution lads, what do you think we're going to end up like, say a millions years?☺ You say that..... Evolution means some factor decides who reproduces more,so the pressures of famine,disease,low fertility,predators etc etc have now been removed in our wealthy,liberal and high tech countries. Those pressures would have killed off weak,unhealthy and stupid people,who now don't die and reproduce. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time? The top end of people may be getting more intelligent etc (possibly),but the fact we're on the whole getting weaker and stupider doesn't disprove evolution,there is almost no selective pressure for those traits in a liberal,civilised society. All that's required is that you can eventually conceive and give birth,with as much assistance as you could possibly want to do even that. Well I think it's logical to say that it does disprove it, it's the complete opposite from evo? Evolution isn't a linear progression. Selective pressure is what drives it,our selective pressures haven't just stagnated,they've almost all been removed. That means that new and unhelpful mutations that pop up aren't culled,and make it into the gene pool,slowly dragging us all down. I know this won't sink in anyway,but there's always hope It sinks in mate, lol but I don't think it's true, which selective pressure have been taken away, an how would that disable e voloution, an how come this didn't happen in the past? So this is to e voloution lads, what do you think we're going to end up like, say a millions years?☺ We might be 9ft tall and live to 900 years old, oops sorry the bible says we've been there already with Noah, if that's the case we are not really evolving at all are we? I don't think we are mate, I just have trouble trying to figure out, why non living material would come alive, why would it do that for, then trying to find something to eat, an a wife, it's just not adding up in my mind mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time? How does Neanderthal man fit into your creationist theory? I mean you use them as an example so you obviously believe they existed but I don't remember them being mentioned in the Bible?. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 I don't much care either way as I'm here and I'm going to enjoy my life as much as I can. Knowing "the truth" wouldn't change a thing. What makes evolution more believable to me is the tiny steps involved. We didn't just turn from one-cell organisms into what we are today overnight. It has been tiny step after tiny step for thousands of years. You can see we are still evolving. We are getting bigger, faster and stronger than we were years ago. Look at the doorways in old houses. Becoming what we are from absolutely nothing in one step. Nope.can't see it. But why are we getting bigger, faster and stronger when the laws of nature say we don't need to? Technology that we use should be shaping the way we evolve, we simply don't need to be the athletes we once was...Mate there's no way we're getting bigger stronger faster, in fact we're getting weaker an slower, just look at ( Neanderthal man ) bigger brain, stronger bones,etc we weak compared to what we were, actually does 2nd law of thermodynamics not saying everything falls apart over time?How does Neanderthal man fit into your creationist theory? I mean you use them as an example so you obviously believe they existed but I don't remember them being mentioned in the Bible?. Neanderthal man was just that a man, bigger stronger, an bigger brain. There's a very well known dentist, I can't remember his name bad, he analysed the actual Neanderthal bodies, primarily there teeth, an he came to the conclusion that there were men nothing else. I'm try get a link mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 As I said earlier man physical state now is terrible compared the last, that's my opinion lad Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Neanderthals were around 40,000 years ago, how does that fit in with your young earth creationist beliefs? I thought the world was only around 6000 years old? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 All this arguments can be settled once and for all by getting rid of time. Time is a man made concept and if you disregard it then things begin to make sense. It's not how old the earth is or the universe it's just a fact that they are. TC Quote Link to post Share on other sites
johnny boy68 11,726 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Neanderthals were around 40,000 years ago, how does that fit in with your young earth creationist beliefs? I thought the world was only around 6000 years old?Carbon dating is just a conspiracy mun. ? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Dinosaurs aswell some of the bible bashers will claim god put the bones in the ground to fool us. Like some big cosmic joke! trully nutcases and clearly dumb as a rock. Sadly america is full of them. f**k bush went on TV @stated gods will put him power! Now that to me would say he's a liar or god is a f***ing idiot lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 19, 2016 Report Share Posted September 19, 2016 Neanderthals were around 40,000 years ago, how does that fit in with your young earth creationist beliefs? I thought the world was only around 6000 years old? It doesn't mate lol As you know the timeline is not set in stone bgd. Scott under man lived with dinosaurs, an still are, dinosaurs are still here, only smaller, all they are is big reptiles. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.