J Darcy 5,871 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts If he was a Somalian good chance he was a Muslim though isn't there ? Just because they say it's not terror related doesn't me it wasn't a Muslim who committed the crime. Are you saying all muslim murderers are terrorists? What's his religion got to do with it if it wasn't the motivation behind the attack? It's got ALOT to do with it....people need to be given the correct information, the truth, then they can make their own mind up IMO. So whenever anyone murders someone we should be told their religion? For what purpose? I'm all for making the motives behind terrorist attacks clear to the public but according to all the information with have at the moment that's not what this was. Because when foreigners come into the Uk and murder people, en masse, we need to know if it is a specific enemy we are up against. Then the Uk people can look at the facts and then IF we ever get a leader strong enough we can decide on the future decisions based on those FACTS. So their religion only matters if they're foreign then? No, but i think any links to anything terror related or people going 'mental' trying to kill people in the street should have their religion recorded. Whats wrong with that? Covering things up won't do any of us any favours. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts If he was a Somalian good chance he was a Muslim though isn't there ? Just because they say it's not terror related doesn't me it wasn't a Muslim who committed the crime. Are you saying all muslim murderers are terrorists? What's his religion got to do with it if it wasn't the motivation behind the attack? It's got ALOT to do with it....people need to be given the correct information, the truth, then they can make their own mind up IMO. So whenever anyone murders someone we should be told their religion? For what purpose? I'm all for making the motives behind terrorist attacks clear to the public but according to all the information with have at the moment that's not what this was. Because when foreigners come into the Uk and murder people, en masse, we need to know if it is a specific enemy we are up against. Then the Uk people can look at the facts and then IF we ever get a leader strong enough we can decide on the future decisions based on those FACTS. So their religion only matters if they're foreign then? You asking questions but why have to you addressed the fact that you have link radicalisation and terrorism to Islam. Are you a racist ? Islam isn't a race Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts If he was a Somalian good chance he was a Muslim though isn't there ? Just because they say it's not terror related doesn't me it wasn't a Muslim who committed the crime. Are you saying all muslim murderers are terrorists? What's his religion got to do with it if it wasn't the motivation behind the attack? It's got ALOT to do with it....people need to be given the correct information, the truth, then they can make their own mind up IMO. So whenever anyone murders someone we should be told their religion? For what purpose? I'm all for making the motives behind terrorist attacks clear to the public but according to all the information with have at the moment that's not what this was. Because when foreigners come into the Uk and murder people, en masse, we need to know if it is a specific enemy we are up against. Then the Uk people can look at the facts and then IF we ever get a leader strong enough we can decide on the future decisions based on those FACTS. So their religion only matters if they're foreign then? No, but i think any links to anything terror related or people going 'mental' trying to kill people in the street should have their religion recorded. Whats wrong with that? Covering things up won't do any of us any favours. Good thing it will be reported on when his religion (if any) is found out during the investigation then 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dark-destroyer-85 636 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts If he was a Somalian good chance he was a Muslim though isn't there ? Just because they say it's not terror related doesn't me it wasn't a Muslim who committed the crime. Are you saying all muslim murderers are terrorists? What's his religion got to do with it if it wasn't the motivation behind the attack? It's got ALOT to do with it....people need to be given the correct information, the truth, then they can make their own mind up IMO. So whenever anyone murders someone we should be told their religion? For what purpose? I'm all for making the motives behind terrorist attacks clear to the public but according to all the information with have at the moment that's not what this was. Because when foreigners come into the Uk and murder people, en masse, we need to know if it is a specific enemy we are up against. Then the Uk people can look at the facts and then IF we ever get a leader strong enough we can decide on the future decisions based on those FACTS. So their religion only matters if they're foreign then? You asking questions but why have to you addressed the fact that you have link radicalisation and terrorism to Islam. Are you a racist ? Islam isn't a race no you're right it's like a b*****d disease Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Why do these threads always turn into one of our hallowed members insulting everyone and/or another nit-picking at what people are saying to try to beat them into the ground with their perverse logic? The fact is yet another muslim (relevant) has plotted and carried out another cowardly attack on people who can't fight back. Whether it is because he is a terrorist or a mental case is not so relevant. As it turned out, this particular murdering c**t was african, but apparently had the same ideals. I'm sure these platitudes we hear are of no consolation whatsoever to people who have lost their lives, lost loved ones or been hurt. Playing games to get one up on someone who fears for their country is disrespecting the victims. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,400 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts Come on BGD.....you surely don't believe that the guy wasn't a terrorist? The wool is being pulled over our eyes, the met police will be under a directive to dumb-down any further terrorist attacks...look who the London mayor is.....it's very convenient to say the guy was mental.... I don't make a habit of buying into conspiracy theories pal. Do you then buy into whatever the media tell you? ... Do you REALLY think the 100s of officers involved in the investigation would all keep quiet about the real motives being covered up? Wasn't that the case in Cologne in Germany at the new year celebrations. Head cop took the fall and resigned. I'm guessing he wasn't working alone. I'd also add, it took a fair length of time for the truth to come out. So yes, I think pc plod, and by pc I mean politically correct are capable of cover ups. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 thon idiot corbyn on saying dont jump to conclusions.ffs does he never stop putting his foot innit. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russell-square-stabbing-london-knife-attack-mayor-latest-news-live-updates-a7171231.html Considering the police are now saying the attack wasn't terror related I'd say Corbyn was right to say we shouldn't jump to conclusions... In fact I'd say the ones who've put their foot in it are the folk that started banging on about terrorism and Islam before we knew any of the facts Come on BGD.....you surely don't believe that the guy wasn't a terrorist? The wool is being pulled over our eyes, the met police will be under a directive to dumb-down any further terrorist attacks...look who the London mayor is.....it's very convenient to say the guy was mental.... I don't make a habit of buying into conspiracy theories pal. Do you then buy into whatever the media tell you? ... Do you REALLY think the 100s of officers involved in the investigation would all keep quiet about the real motives being covered up? Wasn't that the case in Cologne in Germany at the new year celebrations. Head cop took the fall and resigned. I'm guessing he wasn't working alone. I'd also add, it took a fair length of time for the truth to come out. So yes, I think pc plod, and by pc I mean politically correct are capable of cover ups. He was removed from his post a week after the attacks. Is that a "fair length of time" in your world? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
riohog 5,729 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 there is no place in our country for people who practice barbaric religious beliefs, regardless of were they come from , go back to were you came from .we do not want you here 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Why do these threads always turn into one of our hallowed members insulting everyone and/or another nit-picking at what people are saying to try to beat them into the ground with their perverse logic? The fact is yet another muslim (relevant) has plotted and carried out another cowardly attack on people who can't fight back. Whether it is because he is a terrorist or a mental case is not so relevant. As it turned out, this particular murdering c**t was african, but apparently had the same ideals. I'm sure these platitudes we hear are of no consolation whatsoever to people who have lost their lives, lost loved ones or been hurt. Playing games to get one up on someone who fears for their country is disrespecting the victims. It's only relevant if you want to use his actions to attack the 2 billion other Muslims in the world. In fact focusing on his religion if it was indeed down to his mental health could actually do more harm, we need to focus on the real causes of these tragic events so we can come to real solutions not use them to further our own narratives. That's doing a disservice to the victims. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,885 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Why do these threads always turn into one of our hallowed members insulting everyone and/or another nit-picking at what people are saying to try to beat them into the ground with their perverse logic? The fact is yet another muslim (relevant) has plotted and carried out another cowardly attack on people who can't fight back. Whether it is because he is a terrorist or a mental case is not so relevant. As it turned out, this particular murdering c**t was african, but apparently had the same ideals. I'm sure these platitudes we hear are of no consolation whatsoever to people who have lost their lives, lost loved ones or been hurt. Playing games to get one up on someone who fears for their country is disrespecting the victims. exactly walshie. the media must have led us a merry dance for thousands or years that Viking,norse peoples were black as boot polish and worshipped shitslam?????? I thought Vikings were white, blonde hair peoples. these muslims are running riot and the reason they didn't kill him is because they want info outa him, and to try recruit informants to defeat them as they did with the ira. the people of the uk need to start sorting the problem out because the gov aint gona help 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,885 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 Why do these threads always turn into one of our hallowed members insulting everyone and/or another nit-picking at what people are saying to try to beat them into the ground with their perverse logic? The fact is yet another muslim (relevant) has plotted and carried out another cowardly attack on people who can't fight back. Whether it is because he is a terrorist or a mental case is not so relevant. As it turned out, this particular murdering c**t was african, but apparently had the same ideals. I'm sure these platitudes we hear are of no consolation whatsoever to people who have lost their lives, lost loved ones or been hurt. Playing games to get one up on someone who fears for their country is disrespecting the victims. It's only relevant if you want to use his actions to attack the 2 billion other Muslims in the world. In fact focusing on his religion if it was indeed down to his mental health could actually do more harm, we need to focus on the real causes of these tragic events so we can come to real solutions not use them to further our own narratives. That's doing a disservice to the victims. you should get over to theyre shitehole countries and introduce them to the delights of smoking dope, then they might just stop killing innocent helpless victims everytime they don't feel well 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nik_B 3,790 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 There is a major problem with the Saudi Salafist form of Islam so it's fair to say it's not all Islam but Saudi had the billions so it could propagate it's own interpretation of the religion. They fund many mosques and schools and that is why there is so called home grown radicalism. For the people who are defending Islam you would be smart to make this distinction, Saudi and some of the other gulf countries have a lot to answer from. We don't get suicide bombers from the Shia Muslims of Iran for example. We should have no dealings with Saudi at all, they should be sanctioned if anything. Unfortunately the US/CIA UK and others have used Jihadis for regime change since they cannot get public backing from the people to remove people like gaddafi or Assad. It goes back to the creation of Al Qaeda to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 What have the Vikings got to do with this? They attacked us as warriors, not as cowardly dogs. The papers calling this latest coward "Norwegian" is pathetic. A dog born in a barn is still a dog. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 There is a major problem with the Saudi Salafist form of Islam so it's fair to say it's not all Islam but Saudi had the billions so it could propagate it's own interpretation of the religion. They fund many mosques and schools and that is why there is so called home grown radicalism. For the people who are defending Islam you would be smart to make this distinction, Saudi and some of the other gulf countries have a lot to answer from. We don't get suicide bombers from the Shia Muslims of Iran for example. We should have no dealings with Saudi at all, they should be sanctioned if anything. Unfortunately the US/CIA UK and others have used Jihadis for regime change since they cannot get public backing from the people to remove people like gaddafi or Assad. It goes back to the creation of Al Qaeda to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. That's a good post pal can't say I disagree with any of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,885 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Share Posted August 4, 2016 What have the Vikings got to do with this? They attacked us as warriors, not as cowardly dogs. The papers calling this latest coward "Norwegian" is pathetic. A dog born in a barn is still a dog. the fact the media are saying the man was Norwegian lolol or the police saying that. I thought the norse peoples were whites, not something acting as doubles for gorillas in the mist fs. it was I muslim terrorist attack, the reason theyre trying to defend it is because London is over run with them now, very east to take bucky palace, theres no natives left there to help lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.