Muslims Vs Russians

[Brewman 1,192]

 

Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition.

However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front.

Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing.

Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong

Mushers I took that from the Convention of Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which became effective in 1951 and ratified by 147 nations. It became law in 1969 in the UK.

[Lab 10,979]

This is disgusting. Countless pages of berating, putting down, embarrassing, hounding......McDonalds workers. Shame on you lot!!

[walshie 2,804]

Well said Lab.

 

I thought I was the only one who noticed. Anyone considering joining the site would soon decide not to after reading some of this tripe.

[Lab 10,979]

Well said Lab.

 

I thought I was the only one who noticed. Anyone considering joining the site would soon decide not to after reading some of this tripe.

Unless they worked at KFC or Burger King and imagine they'd find it funny as f**k...?

[mushroom 13,235]

 

 

Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition.

However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front.

Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing.

Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong

Mushers I took that from the Convention of Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which became effective in 1951 and ratified by 147 nations. It became law in 1969 in the UK.

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

 

Official international law on genocide mate your intention has to be the eradication /discontinument of a specific group

 

BGD you have proven to everyone here what a tool you are. You accused a man of advocating genocide and ethnic cleansing and have been shown wrong yet you still try and argue the toss, it really is pathetic and so typical of you lefties/socialists. ?

Edited July 20, 2016 by mushroom

[mushroom 13,235]

Would you like more reading??

 

https://www.ushmm.org/confront-genocide/justice-and-accountability/introduction-to-the-definition-of-genocide

[Silversnake 1,099]

Hey bgd where's my apology? You accused me of being a genocidal maniac when I am a mere ethnic cleanser. I can't stand this injustice!!!

[Brewman 1,192]

 

 

 

Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition.

However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front.

Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing.

Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong

Mushers I took that from the Convention of Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which became effective in 1951 and ratified by 147 nations. It became law in 1969 in the UK.

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

Official international law on genocide mate your intention has to be the eradication /discontinument of a specific group

BGD you have proven to everyone here what a tool you are. You accused a man of advocating genocide and ethnic cleansing and have been shown wrong yet you still try and argue the toss, it really is pathetic and so typical of you lefties/socialists.

I understand what you're saying Mushers bit my point was that mass murder to commit genocide is the most effective way to make genocide a success bit there are other methods which would be more time consuming and costly ie segregation and not allowing them to reproduce with the intended end result of genocide by having the group eventually die out.

Another method the serious injury one is much the same, injure them so their injuries kill them.

I'm only going off the stated legal definition.

[Silversnake 1,099]

 

 

 

Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition.

However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front.

Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing.

Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong

Mushers I took that from the Convention of Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which became effective in 1951 and ratified by 147 nations. It became law in 1969 in the UK.

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

 

Official international law on genocide mate your intention has to be the eradication /discontinument of a specific group

 

BGD you have proven to everyone here what a tool you are. You accused a man of advocating genocide and ethnic cleansing and have been shown wrong yet you still try and argue the toss, it really is pathetic and so typical of you lefties/socialists. ?

Thanks mushroom for fighting for justice, that was some effort! I declared you victor a few pages back but brewman had me worried and nearly caused a boilover. I have to say bgd is a BAD BAD BOY, with incredible endurance!

[Silversnake 1,099]

 

 

 

 

Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition.

However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front.

Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing.

Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong

Mushers I took that from the Convention of Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which became effective in 1951 and ratified by 147 nations. It became law in 1969 in the UK.

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext.htm

Official international law on genocide mate your intention has to be the eradication /discontinument of a specific group

BGD you have proven to everyone here what a tool you are. You accused a man of advocating genocide and ethnic cleansing and have been shown wrong yet you still try and argue the toss, it really is pathetic and so typical of you lefties/socialists.

I understand what you're saying Mushers bit my point was that mass murder to commit genocide is the most effective way to make genocide a success bit there are other methods which would be more time consuming and costly ie segregation and not allowing them to reproduce with the intended end result of genocide by having the group eventually die out.

Another method the serious injury one is much the same, injure them so their injuries kill them.

I'm only going off the stated legal definition.

I don't want to kill, injure or prevent them breeding so can we all declare mushroom the victor?

[Brewman 1,192]

Lol leave me out of this one, I was just giving the legal definition of Genocide and the offences included there in.

[Silversnake 1,099]

Lol leave me out of this one, I was just giving the legal definition of Genocide and the offences included there in.

No turning back now brewman

[leethedog 3,071]

Don't know if it's been up before but very intersting from a islamic womanhttps://youtu.be/edVQETclhps

[desertbred 5,490]

The only reason it's the fastest growing religion in the world DB is because Western leaders are letting Muslims spread around the globe then breed en masse.

 

A little salt don't spoil the broth

To much and the broth is ruined.

 

Europes waking up hopefully those in charge keep the numbers at attainable levels or as Enoch Warned they will be rivers of blood on our streets .

 

Even you DB or the appeaser that is Big Gay Dave cannot deny those causing attrocities around the world are from a certain religion.

 

Yes all Muslims are not Terrorists

 

But it seems nowdays most Terrorists are Muslim so they need to be kept to their own lands.

 

It's that simple really don't you agree DB ?

Max there is always a cause or underlying factors for any problem.

Before the West took it on itself to introduce Democracy to the Middle East by Gulf wars 1 and 2, invading Afghanistan Syria Lybia Iraq, removing sovereign Governments, good or bad they were Sovereign Governments

Starting the Arab spring uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt by funding the over throw of their sovereign Governments . Is it any wonder retaliation takes place, ? The British people as far as I am aware voted NOT to invade the Foreign Sovereign states but the Democratically elected Government decided to ignore its own electorate and do it anyway now we can all see the results Terrorist attacks all over the world, Murders attacks on civilians and innocents none of which are acceptable by any standards of Morality but to Blame Islam ,Muslims without accepting responsibility for making the broth that you refer to, is also not acceptable or is it in your world? Dont forget Thousands of Muslims are also dying in these terror attacks children old young. You talkof the refugee crisis yes it is unacceptable but who ignited it in the first instance. Its easy to put blame but blame should be apportioned accordingly. One innocent life lost or innocents injured it totally unacceptable but first people put their own house in order, hate or like the likes of Saddam Gadaffi Mubarak they kept their countries under control until interference fro the Worlds policemen.

s

Edited July 20, 2016 by desertbred

[Silversnake 1,099]

The only reason it's the fastest growing religion in the world DB is because Western leaders are letting Muslims spread around the globe then breed en masse.

 

A little salt don't spoil the broth

To much and the broth is ruined.

 

Europes waking up hopefully those in charge keep the numbers at attainable levels or as Enoch Warned they will be rivers of blood on our streets .

 

Even you DB or the appeaser that is Big Gay Dave cannot deny those causing attrocities around the world are from a certain religion.

 

Yes all Muslims are not Terrorists

 

But it seems nowdays most Terrorists are Muslim so they need to be kept to their own lands.

 

It's that simple really don't you agree DB ?

Good points max, you reminded me of a point I have meant to add but I keep forgetting after reading some of the posts on here, while I have been accused of genocidal tendencies and being an ethnic cleanser (for want of a better word) the truth is I think separation would be the least bloody option. Actually ghandi had the same idea and is the reason Pakistan separated from India and probably subconsciously inspired me as I have known this piece of history for sometime. Was ghandi a genocidal maniac or ethnic cleanser? I do fear the alternative to separation would be a far bloodier and messier outcome.