Brewman 1,192 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Repatriation and ethnic cleansing are completely different things under International law, silver was advocating repatriation What happened in UK/USA and others during ww2 with rounding Germans up was incarceration to prevent disturbance of the peace. Totally legal in those days and nothing to do with genocide or ethnic cleansing. The extinction of the Germanic people's was not the agenda (genocide) nor was it to remove them from Germany their ancient homeland (ethnic cleansing) not was it to send everyone of them back to Germany (forced repatriation) Internment. And it's hapenend more recently than WW2 too. Internment of Irish Rep's is what effectively led to the likes of Bloody Sunday I believe. Infact, isn't Guantanamo effectively an internment camp? Internment was also used in the Republic as well but not so recently. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Interment is still happening in the north, lots of people locked up without charge? Still happening folks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,901 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Interment is still happening in the north, lots of people locked up without charge? Still happening folksequally were being forced to accept known terrorists and murderers telling us how to behave???? Mon Francie it's not all 1 way traffic, how can the leaders in stormont lead anything?? Do as I say not as I do Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leethedog 3,071 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Internment is legal now if the person or persons are a threat to national security in my view all Muslims have the potential to be . Also MY view is any found plotting or conspiring to plot should be interned then forcibly repatriated 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Interment is still happening in the north, lots of people locked up without charge? Still happening folksequally were being forced to accept known terrorists and murderers telling us how to behave???? Mon Francie it's not all 1 way traffic, how can the leaders in stormont lead anything?? Do as I say not as I do Yeah len sinn fein an dup etc, ex terrorists, they all played there part, im just saying interment is still here mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 All these other terms don't sound as dramatic as genocide though when trying discredit someone's views 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 13,253 Posted July 20, 2016 Report Share Posted July 20, 2016 Exactly and that is specifically what left wing fucktards do, they use emotive laden words to try and win an argument... failing that they shout loud, call people names and generally spit the dummy out/curl off a tantrum etc ????? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted July 21, 2016 Report Share Posted July 21, 2016 and then argue for hours about meaningless technicalities and when it all becomes too ridiculous make sure you get the last word and claim victory... Apologist lefties! We should genocide the lot of them lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Definitely not Muslims, they'd be trying to fight women and children instead.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,934 Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 So Silver S segregation isnt going to lead to conflict ? Which planet do you live on. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, so your ilk are fighting a losing battle that is reality.And thats a good thing is it? The worm will turn sooner or later and Islam will be the fastest shrinking religion, honestly it's 2016 weve been to the moon we can clone people and still some people believe this mumbo jumbo.You have yourbeliefs and I have mine along with some vey intelligent people lol so the mumbo jumbo is it me or you that believes it, you listen to your politicians LOL all religion is mumbo jumbo, it's a badly written book from what 4000 years ago that we have paraphrased to suit. Heck they change the rules all the time. Most Muslims can't even agree to what the qaran says Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,934 Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 I don't listen to politicians I listen to my own common sense, unlike like you. And Islam really worked out well for its followers eh? All those smiling happy people in there successful countries infact your all so happy you've embarked on a project to spread Islam's love and happiness around the globe, give yourself a pat on the back I dont and didnt spread f**k all I and my type usually end up cleaning the shite up your type with common sense createwhat with suicide bombing of innocent defenseless people in a cowardly way? No wonder all Muslim countries are dives if that's how you 'clean' up Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,934 Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Integration mate is all I'm advocating or fuuck off and that goes across the board that takes common sense Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,934 Posted July 22, 2016 Report Share Posted July 22, 2016 Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. Sorry brew mate you're wrong also. It has to be with the intent of exterminating a particular group of people. Sending them home is called deportation, resettlement or repatriation under international law not genocide or ethnic cleasing. Edited to add the one exception is if you resettle with sole intention of preventing that groups continued existence. Again something which silver wasn't implying so it still stands, the self hating shit is wrong I've already said on further though ethnic cleansing fits what he was describing better you still spent pages arguing that you had to kill the targetted group for it to counted as genocide, posting a quote as proof that said the opposite of the position you were arguing And let's forget about you not knowing the difference between a dictionary definition and legal definition eh son :laugh: Its not ethnic cleansing when your sending them home. It's just that sending the c**ts home Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.