mushroom 13,304 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 To add; you've just shown the forum what a twit you really are ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 13,304 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Oh by the way I meant posts as in goal posts Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Let's have a look at the facts. I said genocide doesn't require the killing of the group, just to destroy it's existence which can be done in many ways as laid out in the Rome Statute. You said "No you're wrong, here's the legal definition I got out of the dictionary" I told you that wasn't the legal definition then pointed you in the right direction to find it. You come back and paste the definition that says you don't need to kill to commit to genocide and try to argue that it proves your point. I and anyone with a basic grasp of international law laughs at you. Seeing as it obviously means so much to you I'll just let you think you "won". Every experts interpretation of the statutes defining genocide is wrong and you're right Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Your the one arguing and calling for proof. Pretty sad When you're having a discussion about facts and accusations are flying about asking for proof to back up the opposing argument is pretty standard pal or should we all just accept whatever anyone says without asking for proof? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Oh by the way I meant posts as in goal posts No goal posts have been moved (not changed, moved) my position from the start has been you don't need to commit murder to commit acts of genocide, a position backed up by international law... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 I think you have reached new heights (or lows) of how far you can stretch ridiculousness. Thankfully mushroom put a solid shift in on the wind up because I cannot go close to matching you on my own. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,192 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Your the one arguing and calling for proof. Pretty sadWhen you're having a discussion about facts and accusations are flying about asking for proof to back up the opposing argument is pretty standard pal or should we all just accept whatever anyone says without asking for proof? So your fighting to win a discussion on an internet forum ? No just having a discussion, I just like people to back up their position with facts and proof otherwise we don't even know what we're discussing Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. Finally someone with a bit of sense and a grasp of international law Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,924 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 (edited) were halfbred tonight is he out getting fitted for a lumpy vesthes up at the ardoyne band camp chucking bricks after band practice at the shankill Protestant boys. He's showing support for his mother tonight lol Edited July 19, 2016 by Lenmcharristar Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 were halfbred tonight is he out getting fitted for a lumpy vesthes up at the ardoyne band camp chucking bricks after band practice at the shankill Protestant boys Feck sake why didn't he invite me? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 (edited) Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Your the one arguing and calling for proof. Pretty sadWhen you're having a discussion about facts and accusations are flying about asking for proof to back up the opposing argument is pretty standard pal or should we all just accept whatever anyone says without asking for proof? So your fighting to win a discussion on an internet forum ?No just having a discussion, I just like people to back up their position with facts and proof otherwise we don't even know what we're discussing Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. Finally someone with a bit of sense and a grasp of international law Winning or losing the discussion doesn't matter then ?There is no winning or losing when you're talking about facts, just right or wrong but no it doesn't matter, it's a fecking internet forum FFS as soon as this stops entertaining me I'll stop replying Edited July 19, 2016 by BGD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 9,924 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 were halfbred tonight is he out getting fitted for a lumpy vesthes up at the ardoyne band camp chucking bricks after band practice at the shankill Protestant boys Feck sake why didn't he invite me? he said he didn't want you getting hit with his bricks lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Your the one arguing and calling for proof. Pretty sadWhen you're having a discussion about facts and accusations are flying about asking for proof to back up the opposing argument is pretty standard pal or should we all just accept whatever anyone says without asking for proof? So your fighting to win a discussion on an internet forum ?No just having a discussion, I just like people to back up their position with facts and proof otherwise we don't even know what we're discussing Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. Finally someone with a bit of sense and a grasp of international law Winning or losing the discussion doesn't matter then ?There is no winning or losing when you're talking about facts, just right or wrong but no it doesn't matter, it's a fecking internet forum FFS as soon as this stops entertaining me I'll stop replying So why jar somebody else up a about winning or losing an arguement? Because they brought it up, "winning" clearly means a lot to mushroom and silversnake Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted July 19, 2016 Report Share Posted July 19, 2016 Do you know what the funny thing is You're a sore loser like every other leftie shit ? Talking of winning and losing a discussion on an internet forum how sad Still waiting for proof of that accusation..... Your the one arguing and calling for proof. Pretty sadWhen you're having a discussion about facts and accusations are flying about asking for proof to back up the opposing argument is pretty standard pal or should we all just accept whatever anyone says without asking for proof? So your fighting to win a discussion on an internet forum ?No just having a discussion, I just like people to back up their position with facts and proof otherwise we don't even know what we're discussing Gentlemen, I hope I don't piss on anyone's barbecue but BGD is right on the Genocide legal definition. However even though you don't have to commit murder to commit genocide the other offences mentioned are theoretically enough to decrease numbers of said race quite quickly but mass murder is probably the best method to be successful on the genocide front. Finally someone with a bit of sense and a grasp of international law Winning or losing the discussion doesn't matter then ?There is no winning or losing when you're talking about facts, just right or wrong but no it doesn't matter, it's a fecking internet forum FFS as soon as this stops entertaining me I'll stop replying So why jar somebody else up a about winning or losing an arguement? Because they brought it up, "winning" clearly means a lot to mushroom and silversnake So your wrong? No? Genocide doesn't require killing, that's clear to anyone who reads the statutes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.