gnasher16 30,121 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 (edited) You see in your experience? Aren't you the man who brags about being an ex football hooligan? Real hard cases don't brag about things like that.... They just don't.... Do i brag about being an ex football hooligan.....no......do i have a bit of fun and a natter about old times fighting at the football years ago as many people do.....yes......who ever said people who had fights at football were hard cases....or even wanted to be. Look son your obviously beginning to go into meltdown which to be fair was probably expected at some point with some of the daft comments you have made....but before you completely go off the rails please just answer me this.......what exactly is the difference between what you called " full time boxing fans "......and " part time boxing fans " ?........curiosity has got the better of me Edited September 13, 2016 by gnasher16 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,121 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 (edited) Ggg bigger man bigger weight. Brook had to climb .. Ggg bigger manWas he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer.... No......he just weighed more. By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !! He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man.... Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner suit that Golvkin could............however this is still a discussion about boxing isnt it ? Tell me...... who would you say " is the bigger man "......Prince Naseem Hamed...........or.........Gennady Golvkin ? Well seeing as though fat contributes to how much a man weighs then in boxing terms Hamed would be the bigger man if he was to fight tonight, am I right or am I right? No you are totally and utterly wrong !........Bollocks then lets get Zippy and Bungle on the case.......ok look....where your argument falls down is when you say " in boxing terms ".........no.....not in boxing terms....... in pure physical human density thats all........in boxing terms if Naz got into a boxing ring with Golovkin he will ALWAYS be the smaller man regardless what he weighs as the way in which weight/size relates to boxing being obese is not an advantage !!!.......his bone density wont change,his tendon size wont change,his feet wont grow the more food he eats !........im not a rude person so i can see exactly where your mind is leading you.....its just the wrong way.............if you still still still cant accept it then my guess is your just on a wind up. Edited September 13, 2016 by gnasher16 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 You see in your experience? Aren't you the man who brags about being an ex football hooligan? Real hard cases don't brag about things like that.... They just don't.... Do i brag about being an ex football hooligan.....no......do i have a bit of fun and a natter about old times fighting at the football years ago as many people do.....yes......who ever said people who had fights at football were hard cases....or even wanted to be. Look son your obviously beginning to go into meltdown which to be fair was probably expected at some point with some of the daft comments you have made....but before you completely go off the rails please just answer me this.......what exactly is the difference between what you called " full time boxing fans "......and " part time boxing fans " ?........curiosity has got the better of me I ain't going into meltdown, like water off a ducks back.... The difference is clear to see on here and Facebook, Football fans who watch a little boxing now and again with no sense of results and outcomes of the past. Jumping on the bandwagon with no research whatsoever, taking what the media says as gospel etc..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 (edited) Ggg bigger man bigger weight. Brook had to climb .. Ggg bigger manWas he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer.... No......he just weighed more. By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !! He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man.... Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner suit that Golvkin could............however this is still a discussion about boxing isnt it ? Tell me...... who would you say " is the bigger man "......Prince Naseem Hamed...........or.........Gennady Golvkin ? Well seeing as though fat contributes to how much a man weighs then in boxing terms Hamed would be the bigger man if he was to fight tonight, am I right or am I right? No you are totally and utterly wrong !........Bollocks then lets get Zippy and Bungle on the case.......ok look....where your argument falls down is when you say " in boxing terms ".........no.....not in boxing terms....... in pure physical human density thats all........in boxing terms if Naz got into a boxing ring with Golovkin he will ALWAYS be the smaller man regardless what he weighs as the way in which weight/size relates to boxing being obese is not an advantage !!!.......his bone density wont change,his tendon size wont change,his feet wont grow the more food he eats !........im not a rude person so i can see exactly where your mind is leading you.....its just the wrong way.............if you still still still cant accept it then my guess is your just on a wind up.If Hamed was to fight tonight he wouldn't even be able to fight Golovkin as he wouldn't make the weight, so in Boxing terms he would be too big, yes or no???? Edited September 13, 2016 by DogFox123 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 (edited) It's funny how you bring up a midget and a fat midget to try and make the point, no need to go silly son... Ok then who was the bigger, stronger man in Tyson and Holyfield when they met? Edited September 13, 2016 by DogFox123 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDHUNTING 1,817 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Whats bigger a 2lb of lead or 1lb of polystyrene? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Whats bigger a 2lb of lead or 1lb of polystyrene? A bag of sugar. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 This is going nowhere, like knocking on wood.... Golovkin is naturally the bigger man, but on the day of the fight he was not the bigger man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,161 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Heavier Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,121 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 I ain't going into meltdown, like water off a ducks back.... The difference is clear to see on here and Facebook, Football fans who watch a little boxing now and again with no sense of results and outcomes of the past. Jumping on the bandwagon with no research whatsoever, taking what the media says as gospel etc..... The funniest part of this post is the fact you dont know why its so funny If Hamed was to fight tonight he wouldn't even be able to fight Golovkin as he wouldn't make the weight, so in Boxing terms he would be too big, yes or no???? Oh damn you got me on a technicality......ok then.....in bare knuckle straightener in the car park terms.......who would be the bigger man ? Your entertaining mate i give you that ! It's funny how you bring up a midget and a fat midget to try and make the point, no need to go silly son... Like i said some people need the Zippy and Bungle approach. Golovkin is naturally the bigger man, but on the day of the fight he was not the bigger man. oooooooh nearly you almost got it then.......i,ll rephrase it for you...... " Golovkin is naturally the bigger man,but on the day of the fight he was still naturally the bigger man "........now repeat after me..... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,121 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 This is going nowhere, like knocking on wood.... Please please please.........don't go yet......please do the one about the full time and part time fans first ?.........a bit lively if you can i can hear the ol woman clanking the plates around so before dinner if possible Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Gnasher a man who thinks Tyson wasn't a technical marvel doesn't know much about boxing IMO, guess that's aimed at you Mr Boxing... ? So now you concede that in BOXING TERMS Hamed would be the BIGGER MAN??? Answer my question Zippy, who was the bigger, stronger man in Tyson and Holyfield when they fought??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 That's why we have something called weights in Boxing, last I heard fat as well as muscle was included in the weigh-in. Butterbean wasn't really a heavyweight, he just weighed like a heavyweight.... ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,121 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Gnasher a man who thinks Tyson wasn't a technical marvel doesn't know much about boxing IMO, guess that's aimed at you Mr Boxing... Dont worry me ol fruit i can live with it.......i suppose i,ll just have to get a subscription to Boxing Monthly and go on some boxing interweb forums and try to reach your level of understanding So now you concede that in BOXING TERMS Hamed would be the BIGGER MAN??? like i said.......ive already sussed the wind up Answer my question Zippy, who was the bigger, stronger man in Tyson and Holyfield when they fought??? How should i know i wasnt in the ring....was you ?......as a spectator it looked like Holyfield.....so what. Now come on do the full time/part time fans one or im not playing anymore. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,161 Posted September 13, 2016 Report Share Posted September 13, 2016 Gnasher wasnt you a professional boxer ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.