Jump to content

Triple G Vs Brook


Recommended Posts

 

Pretty sure you're talking out of your backside again.....

 

I've forgotten more about fighting than you'll ever know soft lad...

 

Theres just too much to trawl through some folk just have to be left thinking they are right i guess........but these couple of lines above tickled me.......you see in my experience people who have actually done a thing or two....or even know a thing or two.......just dont say things like that......they just dont.

Edited by gnasher16
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 443
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Keepdiggin put that 100 into the Bradley fund will you mate please.......over on the thread Max started about the sick young lad.....cheers

Over the years I have read some strange opinions about boxing ,some absolute idiotic statements but saying Golovkin is all hype ,must be the silliest most ignorant one yet .

This will teach ol man Eubank to stop f****n around with his sons career !

Posted Images

 

 

Why bring up a midget like Frampton anyway? Seeing as though boxing is governed by weight and not height then yes if he was heavier than Golovkin on the night then he would be the bigger man on the night would he not?

 

 

 

Because i thought it would be the most simplistic way of giving an example to your theory......however.....instead of insulting your intelligence and saying you don't seem to understand im going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say i think your probably just being a little bit mischievous ;)

 

 

 

Aren't you the guy who said Tyson was just a come forward slugger when in reality he was one of the greatest technical heavyweights of all time? I hope one day to have half the knowledge of you Mr Boxing one can wish hey...

 

 

Ive never called him " just a come forward slugger " no.........but if you think a guy who barely ever threw a jab in his entire career and defensively fell to pieces every time he was in trouble in a fight was one of the greatest technical heavyweights of all time........then ok :blink:

 

 

 

 

Exactly, you know as well as I do it wasn't the size that beat Brook. GGG is a brilliant fighter, he cuts the ring off better than anyone I can remember.

I dont disagree

 

Who was the bigger man on the day of the fight?

 

Golovkin......as he will be next week next month and next year.

Tyson barely threw a jab? Take it you never saw him fight under Rooney? He was technically one of the best Heavyweights ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Pretty sure you're talking out of your backside again.....

 

I've forgotten more about fighting than you'll ever know soft lad...

 

Theres just too much to trawl through some folk just have to be left thinking they are right i guess........but these couple of lines above tickled me.......you see in my experience people who have actually done a thing or two....or even know a thing or two.......just dont say things like that......they just dont.
You see in your experience? Aren't you the man who brags about being an ex football hooligan? Real hard cases don't brag about things like that.... They just don't.... Edited by DogFox123
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Ggg bigger man bigger weight. Brook had to climb .. Ggg bigger man

Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer....

No......he just weighed more.

 

By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !!

He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Tyson barely threw a jab? Take it you never saw him fight under Rooney? He was technically one of the best Heavyweights ever.

 

Is this where we get into the whole " when he didnt have problems " debate again ?........you are aware that opponents can hit back arent you......yes he was technically one of the best ever when nobody was hitting him.......wonderful.

Edited by gnasher16
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Ggg bigger man bigger weight. Brook had to climb .. Ggg bigger man

Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer....

No......he just weighed more.

 

By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !!

He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man....

 

Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner suit that Golvkin could............however this is still a discussion about boxing isnt it ?

 

Tell me...... who would you say " is the bigger man "......Prince Naseem Hamed...........or.........Gennady Golvkin ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Tyson barely threw a jab? Take it you never saw him fight under Rooney? He was technically one of the best Heavyweights ever.

 

Is this where we get into the whole " when he didnt have problems " debate again ?........you are aware that opponents can hit back arent you......yes he was technically one of the best ever when nobody was hitting him......wonderful.

No it's when he was disciplined and with a trainer that knew the style. If you don't think Tyson technically was one of the best ever then we will just leave it at that.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear lord, this has all got a bit lively since I last looked! And on a school night, when judging by the comment the author's of such should be in their beddy Bo byes...

Yokel

Dont you two go to work ?.......some of us dont have to be in bed early for school or work we can f**k around talking bollocks till our hearts content get over it ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Ggg bigger man bigger weight. Brook had to climb .. Ggg bigger man

Was he the bigger man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight? Simple yes or no answer....

No......he just weighed more.

 

By your logic Carl Frampton could outweigh Tyson Fury on the scales and therefore be the bigger man..................if you still refuse to back down/cant work it out.......then im afraid you,ll just have to be left to it as im not about to enter the realms of Zippy and Bungle to explain it !!

He weighed more so in boxing terms on the day of the fight he was the BIGGER man....

Terrific we,ve now established that Brook would not have got into the same dinner suit that Golvkin could............however this is still a discussion about boxing isnt it ?

 

Tell me...... who would you say " is the bigger man "......Prince Naseem Hamed...........or.........Gennady Golvkin ?

Well seeing as though fat contributes to how much a man weighs then in boxing terms Hamed would be the bigger man if he was to fight tonight, am I right or am I right?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...