DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Stats are right judges know f**k all. Mcgregor won via judge decision stats say different. I've never considered steroids. I'm very tempted to take steroids I jag them up my arse all the timeYou don't think Conner putting him on his arse 3 times had a bearing on the scorecard? Seriously pal you don't have a Scooby..... I know a few things you're tempted to take in the arse and it ain't steroids soft lad.... So now fight judges are right? Make your mind up n stop with the soft lad that's patter people with a complex and take gear use. What the fcuk are you talking about? Anybody with half a brain cell knows the judges were way off in the Brook fight. You understand soft lad? You keep talking about pricks and bums, you want to inject me don't you soft lad.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Stats are right judges know f**k all. Mcgregor won via judge decision stats say different. I've never considered steroids. I'm very tempted to take steroids I jag them up my arse all the timeYou don't think Conner putting him on his arse 3 times had a bearing on the scorecard? Seriously pal you don't have a Scooby..... I know a few things you're tempted to take in the arse and it ain't steroids soft lad.... Do knock downs score? Not exactly but if a fighter dominates enough in a round it is usually a 10-8 round. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Stats are right judges know f**k all. Mcgregor won via judge decision stats say different. I've never considered steroids. I'm very tempted to take steroids I jag them up my arse all the timeYou don't think Conner putting him on his arse 3 times had a bearing on the scorecard? Seriously pal you don't have a Scooby..... I know a few things you're tempted to take in the arse and it ain't steroids soft lad.... So now fight judges are right? Make your mind up n stop with the soft lad that's patter people with a complex and take gear use.What the fcuk are you talking about? Anybody with half a brain cell knows the judges were way off in the Brook fight. You understand soft lad? You keep talking about pricks and bums, you want to inject me don't you soft lad....You said fight judges no f**k all and stats are right yet you agree with judges in mcgregor fight tho the stats says different I said THESE judges knew fcuk all and plenty others out there don't. They get caught up in the atmosphere or are paid off. Is there only one set of judges in the fighting world? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Bent judges or not, Brook wouldn't see the final bell against Golovkin if they fought 100 times... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fcuk it I give up, a judge enters a sore for a round on a card, and he is wrong. Some dimwit enters it on a computer and he is right. FFS get real. TC 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,514 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) On the day of the fight they have to now have a check weigh-in to prevent fighters having a massive size advantage come fight time, is this getting through that dense head of yours??? Dogfox im not going to get into a shit slinging contest.....i know you think you are right and it all makes sense in your head.....but you are wrong in virtually everything you are saying.......the above being a simple example.............fight day check weigh ins are not to prevent any size advantages they are simply to ensure fighters cant rehydrate more than the allowed %.......its a safety thing. As regards gaining mass on a calorie deficit......again we are talking about lean tissue not muscle mass im not sure you know the difference between how weight/water/conditioning relates to " a fight " and how it relates to a bodybuilding contest we we are not talking about nutrient timing we are talking about how the body pulls away from water in a weight cut........to say Brook is/was/or ever will be a bigger man than Golovkin is just silly.....i ask you again if Carl Frampton weighed in at 161 and Golovkin weighed in at 160 at 6pm on a Friday night is Carl Frampton a bigger man at 6 pm on that Friday night ?.....its not a difficult question ? The very simple way at looking at Golovkin/Brook as physical specimens is Brook CAN make welterweight......Golovkin could never make welterweight without eating into muscle tissue.......it would be like saying Tony Bellew COULD make middleweight ! Edited September 12, 2016 by gnasher16 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fcuk it I give up, a judge enters a sore for a round on a card, and he is wrong. Some dimwit enters it on a computer and he is right. FFS get real. TC Like talking to morons, the operators at CompuBox aren't scoring the fight. They are pressing one of the four keys whenever a shot is landed.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
VOON 1,317 Posted September 12, 2016 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fook, this thread has really kicked off, if we was all teenagers, would this be how internet bullying starts? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fcuk it I give up, a judge enters a sore for a round on a card, and he is wrong. Some dimwit enters it on a computer and he is right. FFS get real. TC Like talking to morons, the operators at CompuBox aren't scoring the fight. They are pressing one of the four keys whenever a shot is landed.... If your IQ was just 1.5% higher you might just make a tree. TC 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fcuk it I give up, a judge enters a sore for a round on a card, and he is wrong. Some dimwit enters it on a computer and he is right. FFS get real. TC Like talking to morons, the operators at CompuBox aren't scoring the fight. They are pressing one of the four keys whenever a shot is landed.... If your IQ was just 1.5% higher you might just make a tree. TC Well done. You had us all biting I mean no one could say what you have and be serious, could they? TC Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Fcuk it I give up, a judge enters a sore for a round on a card, and he is wrong. Some dimwit enters it on a computer and he is right. FFS get real. TC Like talking to morons, the operators at CompuBox aren't scoring the fight. They are pressing one of the four keys whenever a shot is landed.... If your IQ was just 1.5% higher you might just make a tree. TC Better than pond life I guess... ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) On the day of the fight they have to now have a check weigh-in to prevent fighters having a massive size advantage come fight time, is this getting through that dense head of yours??? Dogfox im not going to get into a shit slinging contest.....i know you think you are right and it all makes sense in your head.....but you are wrong in virtually everything you are saying.......the above being a simple example.............fight day check weigh ins are not to prevent any size advantages they are simply to ensure fighters cant rehydrate more than the allowed %.......its a safety thing. As regards gaining mass on a calorie deficit......again we are talking about lean tissue not muscle mass im not sure you know the difference between how weight/water/conditioning relates to " a fight " and how it relates to a bodybuilding contest we we are not talking about nutrient timing we are talking about how the body pulls away from water in a weight cut........to say Brook is/was/or ever will be a bigger man than Golovkin is just silly.....i ask you again if Carl Frampton weighed in at 161 and Golovkin weighed in at 160 at 6pm on a Friday night is Carl Frampton a bigger man at 6 pm on that Friday night ?.....its not a difficult question ? The very simple way at looking at Golovkin/Brook as physical specimens is Brook CAN make welterweight......Golovkin could never make welterweight without eating into muscle tissue.......it would be like saying Tony Bellew COULD make middleweight ! Wrong again Gnasher, the rehydration clause is not a mandatory safety regulation. Amir Khan refused to ask for a rehydration clause against Canelo. You do know that putting on weight isn't a sign that a fighter is hydrated? It's a safety measures for the smaller guy, so they aren't at a massive size disadvantage come fight night. I'll say it again, Brook was the BIGGER man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight, was he not? Funny how you skip my point of Golovkin saying he could make 154lb with ease, the man isn't a massive Middleweight at all. Edited September 12, 2016 by DogFox123 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
delswal 3,819 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Lost with all this welterweight / middleweight nonsense, Brook fought 36 fights at welter and won 36 at what stage did he or anybody else assume he was a middleweight, he stepped to that weight for one and one reason only…….money, now he's felt the power in the middleweight division don't expect to see him there again, Now for you professional pundits on here, how do you expect Andre Ward to get on now he has moved up to a light heavyweight,and looking to go against Sergey Kovalev ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,514 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) On the day of the fight they have to now have a check weigh-in to prevent fighters having a massive size advantage come fight time, is this getting through that dense head of yours??? Dogfox im not going to get into a shit slinging contest.....i know you think you are right and it all makes sense in your head.....but you are wrong in virtually everything you are saying.......the above being a simple example.............fight day check weigh ins are not to prevent any size advantages they are simply to ensure fighters cant rehydrate more than the allowed %.......its a safety thing. As regards gaining mass on a calorie deficit......again we are talking about lean tissue not muscle mass im not sure you know the difference between how weight/water/conditioning relates to " a fight " and how it relates to a bodybuilding contest we we are not talking about nutrient timing we are talking about how the body pulls away from water in a weight cut........to say Brook is/was/or ever will be a bigger man than Golovkin is just silly.....i ask you again if Carl Frampton weighed in at 161 and Golovkin weighed in at 160 at 6pm on a Friday night is Carl Frampton a bigger man at 6 pm on that Friday night ?.....its not a difficult question ? The very simple way at looking at Golovkin/Brook as physical specimens is Brook CAN make welterweight......Golovkin could never make welterweight without eating into muscle tissue.......it would be like saying Tony Bellew COULD make middleweight ! Wrong again Gnasher, the rehydration clause is not a mandatory safety regulation. Amir Khan refused to ask for a rehydration clause against Canelo. You do know that putting on weight isn't a sign that a fighter is hydrated? It's a safety measures for the smaller guy, so they aren't at a massive size disadvantage come fight night. I'll say it again, Brook was the BIGGER man at the weigh-in and on the day of the fight, was he not? Funny how you skip my point of Golovkin saying he could make 154lb with ease, the man isn't a massive Middleweight at all. Who said he was a massive middleweight ?...........no more funny than you skipping my question about Frampton ?.........it is quite funny watching you rant on its clear you know a little bit....but not a lot im not entirely sure your not on a wind up so i,ll leave it there......maybe one day i,ll be a big proper full time boxing fan like what you are but i just dont have the dedication to put the leg work in these days so i,ll just rely on plain old experience........ta ta champ Edited September 12, 2016 by gnasher16 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Lost with all this welterweight / middleweight nonsense, Brook fought 36 fights at welter and won 36 at what stage did he or anybody else assume he was a middleweight, he stepped to that weight for one and one reason only.money, now he's felt the power in the middleweight division don't expect to see him there again, Now for you professional pundits on here, how do you expect Andre Ward to get on now he has moved up to a light heavyweight,and looking to go against Sergey Kovalev ? He ain't going back to Welterweight either as he said it was killing him making weight. He will stay at 154lb from now on although I think he'd be very competitive against any Middleweight not named Golovkin. Ward hasn't been active enough recently and has looked average of late, I think Kovalev wins on points or late stoppage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.