Triple G Vs Brook

[Craic 204]

 

Should I get the popcorn, let go champ

kinda look at my location,

 

Are you typing in a tunnel in a tunnel???

[delswal 3,819]

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/775644736032047108/video/1

 

Why wasn't it made last time?

It will be made soon hopefully

Money remeber it's a buisness also

The good old money excuse hey, had the chance to win all those belts and bottled it.

 

You willing to put money on it?

Not really to be honest I couldn't give a f**k I don't bet anymore I'm the most unluckiest person in the world you can Garantee if I bet I loose I just want to see a good fight with a uk middle Weight like Saunders or Eubank the only bet I regret not taking was for 500 someone of here during the fury fight

Both didn't want the fight, like Golovkin's promoter said. Seeing him getting caught against Brook might help them find the courage to get in the ring with him, time will tell.

 

He starches both IMO, neither have got the chin to last 12 rounds with him.

He's like aj overrated power

 

Why do you think Froch avoided fighting GGG? and Froch was and always will be a better fighter than BJS will ever make

[MickC 1,825]

 

GGG could move upto SMW once he has all the belts at MW,he has to fight his mandatory Jacobs next but would be allowed to fight Saunders instead with it being a unification fight and then with no other belts to fight for he may move up.He has recently stated he would like to fight Degale and Jack next year so he must already be thinking of moving up.

Seriously though I don't think James Degale is a big enough reason to move up in weight even though GGG would win, I doubt fighting him is going to catapult his legacy. Golovkin isn't a big Middleweight, he makes weight fine. I don't get the obsession for fighters to move up in weight, Hagler didn't do it and neither did Monzon.

 

I know what your saying DF but I just think with GGG at the age hes at ,once he has all the belts at MW he will move up to SMW and try and win all the belts there.Like you say there is no standout fighter up at SMW so this could well encourage him to move up a division.

[YOKEL 2,294]

 

 

cor cheers for that gnash, i lead such a sheltered life I've never come across people having disagreements before, certainly not in the angelic company i keep, how long will it take me to get used to it? i don't see anything in my quoted post where i state i "enjoy watching girls bickering" and as for hanging around school playgrounds....do you have much experience of this?

Yokel

 

If you enjoy watching girls bickering more than watching the telly then get rid of your telly....or dont its up to you.

 

no i dont hang around school playgrounds ....do you ?......to me to you to me to you.

 

Gnasher , kinda off topic, but would you know if klitschko ever trained at the Peacock gym canning town, just I seem to remember seeing him there my friend said I'm talking bull,

Yes he did mate....not sure id call it " training " as such but the gym was made available to him privately......as it has been for many foreign fighters.

 

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

 

 

 

cor cheers for that gnash, i lead such a sheltered life I've never come across people having disagreements before, certainly not in the angelic company i keep, how long will it take me to get used to it? i don't see anything in my quoted post where i state i "enjoy watching girls bickering" and as for hanging around school playgrounds....do you have much experience of this?

Yokel

 

If you enjoy watching girls bickering more than watching the telly then get rid of your telly....or dont its up to you.

 

no i dont hang around school playgrounds ....do you ?......to me to you to me to you.

Gnasher , kinda off topic, but would you know if klitschko ever trained at the Peacock gym canning town, just I seem to remember seeing him there my friend said I'm talking bull,

Yes he did mate....not sure id call it " training " as such but the gym was made available to him privately......as it has been for many foreign fighters.

chuckle-brother-502624.jpg

Oh dear oh dear....

[gnasher16 30,514]

 

I've always said Golovkin is the naturally bigger man, never said otherwise. I said Brook was the bigger man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in, these are FACTS!!!

 

You said Brook was the bigger man in the ring " in terms of boxing ".........now correct me if im wrong but boxing takes place in a ring.........and you are now saying Golovkin was naturally the bigger man in the ring..............do you watch The Tweenies ?

 

 

Part-timers are the folk who watch one or two fights a year and take the mainstream media and it's exaggerated claims as gospel without doing the proper research themselves, jumping on the bandwagon so to speak. Facebook was especially rife of it before the big fight last weekend, seeing as though it's Facebook I just let them get on with it....

 

So you consider yourself " better " than them because you do the research ?..........do you have a subscription to Boxing Monthly by any chance ?

 

 

There you go again Gnasher you scallywag you, at it again. You missed the "best fighters" part....

 

 

no your just trying too hard now.

Edited September 14, 2016 by gnasher16

[gnasher16 30,514]

 

 

chuckle-brother-502624.jpg

 

I want to be the good looking one.

[YOKEL 2,294]

 

 

 

chuckle-brother-502624.jpg

 

I want to be the good looking one.

 

o.k then, as long as you buy the drinks...

Yokel

[arcticgun 4,548]

Think Canelo the fight Golovkin wants in longer run, Saunders belt likely be next. Sure his aim was too win all the belts at middle weights then move up in weight but who knows, personally I think GGG v Canelo would be a great fight hope it comes sooner rather than later ?

Edited September 14, 2016 by arcticgun

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

I've always said Golovkin is the naturally bigger man, never said otherwise. I said Brook was the bigger man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in, these are FACTS!!!

 

 

You said Brook was the bigger man in the ring " in terms of boxing ".........now correct me if im wrong but boxing takes place in a ring.........and you are now saying Golovkin was naturally the bigger man in the ring..............do you watch The Tweenies ?

Part-timers are the folk who watch one or two fights a year and take the mainstream media and it's exaggerated claims as gospel without doing the proper research themselves, jumping on the bandwagon so to speak. Facebook was especially rife of it before the big fight last weekend, seeing as though it's Facebook I just let them get on with it....

 

So you consider yourself " better " than them because you do the research ?..........do you have a subscription to Boxing Monthly by any chance ?

There you go again Gnasher you scallywag you, at it again. You missed the "best fighters" part....

 

no your just trying too hard now.

I'll say it again for the millionth time, Brook was the "bigger" man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in. In boxing terms who would be the bigger man tonight in Kel Brook and Hamed? The answer is Hamed as he would be in a bigger weight class, take it Groundhog Day is your favourite film???

 

Better no, more knowledgable than most yes. No I don't subscribe to any boxing magazines do you? What makes you a leading authority on the subject? I've never known any leading authorities on boxing claim Mike Tyson wasn't a technically gifted heavyweight.

[gnasher16 30,514]

 

I'll say it again for the millionth time, Brook was the "bigger" man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in. In boxing terms who would be the bigger man tonight in Kel Brook and Hamed? The answer is Hamed as he would be in a bigger weight class, take it Groundhog Day is your favourite film???

 

Better no, more knowledgable than most yes. No I don't subscribe to any boxing magazines do you? What makes you a leading authority on the subject? I've never known any leading authorities on boxing claim Mike Tyson wasn't a technically gifted heavyweight.

 

I tell you what i,ll keep it nice and simple for you......Golovkin was naturally the bigger man on the Monday before the fight.....he was naturally the bigger man on the Tuesday before the fight.....the Wednesday,Thursday,Friday.......and yes you guessed it he was also the naturally bigger man in the ring on Saturday.....as he will also be the naturally bigger man next week next month and next year..............and Roberts your fathers brother

 

As for who is the biggest expert with the most knowledge....i really couldnt care less like i already said i dont feel a man should have to say " ive forgotten more than you will ever know " on any subject they claim to know a bit about.

 

Having had my own experiences to fall back on and having spoken on a regular basis to many people at a very high level in the sport i dont feel my knowledge is any more than it needs to be.....im not like you i dont know the inside leg measurements of every fighter in the entire world and i havent watched every youtube clip on the subject of boxing in the entire internet....my guess would be that you probably wasnt even born when Mike Tyson was at his best and so wouldnt of known the gym talk and general feeling among folk you have merely studied his fights and watched all the documentaries....which is fine......but theres a reason id hazard a fairly confident guess at your age.......and thats down to experience as well

 

Oh one last thing......those " part time " fans that you show such contempt for are by and large the reason British boxing is currently going through the golden period and popularity that it is.......but you are better than them because you research boxers !!.....im away to my foreign hideaway soon so i doubt i,ll reply to the barrage that comes back....but hey.....make sure to keep an eye out for Ovill Mckenzies title challenge next week.....smashing lad and one of the most unassuming,unpopular and under appreciated fighters in the country...done everything the hard way and a geuine tough guy...but boy if he could pull it off it will be party time round Canning Town .....adios amigo.

Edited September 15, 2016 by gnasher16

[Astanley 11,580]

When do I get an invite to this hideaway ?

[dytkos 17,828]

Any relation to Duke and the other one who's name I can't remember?

 

Cheers, D.

[gnasher16 30,514]

When do I get an invite to this hideaway ?

Get your bikini line in order and come on down

 

Any relation to Duke and the other one who's name I can't remember?

 

Cheers, D.

No mate

[DogFox123 1,379]

 

 

I'll say it again for the millionth time, Brook was the "bigger" man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in. In boxing terms who would be the bigger man tonight in Kel Brook and Hamed? The answer is Hamed as he would be in a bigger weight class, take it Groundhog Day is your favourite film???

 

Better no, more knowledgable than most yes. No I don't subscribe to any boxing magazines do you? What makes you a leading authority on the subject? I've never known any leading authorities on boxing claim Mike Tyson wasn't a technically gifted heavyweight.

 

I tell you what i,ll keep it nice and simple for you......Golovkin was naturally the bigger man on the Monday before the fight.....he was naturally the bigger man on the Tuesday before the fight.....the Wednesday,Thursday,Friday.......and yes you guessed it he was also the naturally bigger man in the ring on Saturday.....as he will also be the naturally bigger man next week next month and next year..............and Roberts your fathers brother

 

As for who is the biggest expert with the most knowledge....i really couldnt care less like i already said i dont feel a man should have to say " ive forgotten more than you will ever know " on any subject they claim to know a bit about.

 

Having had my own experiences to fall back on and having spoken on a regular basis to many people at a very high level in the sport i dont feel my knowledge is any more than it needs to be.....im not like you i dont know the inside leg measurements of every fighter in the entire world and i havent watched every youtube clip on the subject of boxing in the entire internet....my guess would be that you probably wasnt even born when Mike Tyson was at his best and so wouldnt of known the gym talk and general feeling among folk you have merely studied his fights and watched all the documentaries....which is fine......but theres a reason id hazard a fairly confident guess at your age.......and thats down to experience as well

 

Oh one last thing......those " part time " fans that you show such contempt for are by and large the reason British boxing is currently going through the golden period and popularity that it is.......but you are better than them because you research boxers !!.....im away to my foreign hideaway soon so i doubt i,ll reply to the barrage that comes back....but hey.....make sure to keep an eye out for Ovill Mckenzies title challenge next week.....smashing lad and one of the most unassuming,unpopular and under appreciated fighters in the country...done everything the hard way and a geuine tough guy...but boy if he could pull it off it will be party time round Canning Town .....adios amigo.

I've always stated he was naturally the bigger man but he wasn't the bigger man on the scales on both days, this is a fact. Golovkin could make Light Middleweight so there's not a massive size difference between them. Brook and Golovkin are a lot closer in size than Khan and Canelo.

 

I don't claim to know more than any other person, Ginger Nackers was giving it the big one so I put him in his place...

 

Come on then please tell, what experiences? I've boxed as an amatuer as a young teenager and have been quite good at other sports, doesn't make me an expert.

 

Oh but I was born before Tyson was champ so you're wrong there matey, I don't think age automatically makes someone more knowledgeable on a subject anyway.

 

Don't leave us hanging, you turned pro? What weight and what's your record???