Boxing At The Weekend...

[Bakerboy 4,736]

Just now, shaaark said:

@Bakerboy

There are lots more of the same stuff that Gooey has written like that on here.

And if, like most people on here do, you/we agree that Ali was the best Heavyweight of all time, that last paragraph proves what I said earlier.

And yes, I'm well aware that max thought the same as Gooey.  Lol

I always skip past his posts after some bollocks he posted a year or 2 back regarding terriers so I'll have take your word for it

[shaaark 10,846]

11 hours ago, Bakerboy said:

I always skip past his posts after some bollocks he posted a year or 2 back regarding terriers so I'll have take your word for it

[gnasher16 30,186]

On 08/09/2023 at 19:00, mC HULL said:

lol i’ve never once claimed him to be the greatest of all time but i have said he would hold his own and be hard for any heavyweight ever to beat 

Totally agree,of course he would.....but ONLY because of his size advantage.....and thats the issue with the current heavyweight division you get false readings.

[gnasher16 30,186]

On 08/09/2023 at 22:54, mC HULL said:

 

norton and frazier for instance had his number holmes lewis would have been there aswell 

 

Thats just a silly comment.....Norton and Frazier both lost to Ali more times than they beat him how is that having his number ?......beyond the last 2 fights Ali avenged every defeat he ever had and beat the best names of not only his era but several other eras.

To put that into context your man Fury has only ever beaten 1 top name of the current era.

Ive always thought it would be a nice posthumous tribute to Ali to have the last 2 fights of his career officially taken off of his record being as he had Parkinsons by then.

[mC HULL 12,815]

9 minutes ago, gnasher16 said:

Thats just a silly comment.....Norton and Frazier both lost to Ali more times than they beat him how is that having his number ?......beyond the last 2 fights Ali avenged every defeat he ever had and beat the best names of not only his era but several other eras.

To put that into context your man Fury has only ever beaten 1 top name of the current era.

Ive always thought it would be a nice posthumous tribute to Ali to have the last 2 fights of his career officially taken off of his record being as he had Parkinsons by then.

if you watch without the rose tinted glasses on gnash it should a been 2-1 to norton not ali in there fights 

and not to forget frazier won the first both  at the top of there game 

and was begging to keep going while ali was trying to jack but his corner wouldn’t let him fraziers  corner stopped it 

Edited September 10, 2023 by mC HULL

[mC HULL 12,815]

18 minutes ago, gnasher16 said:

Totally agree,of course he would.....but ONLY because of his size advantage.....and thats the issue with the current heavyweight division you get false readings.

that’s it 

but there’s been big heavyweights gnash fury moves well for his size 

[Blackmag 6,101]

Just now, mC HULL said:

that’s it 

but there’s been big heavyweights gnash fury moves well for his size 

Were in any other weight division is there such a size and weight difference than what's in the heavys  there isn't mc and I see other boxers undefeated champions putting there record on the line against other undefeated champions to secure there legacy why doesn't fury he's enough money he could go down in history but no it's all about coin and protecting the no loss record 

[shaaark 10,846]

1 hour ago, mC HULL said:

that’s it 

but there’s been big heavyweights gnash fury moves well for his size 

Gooey, I don't know if you are actually aware of what you're writing?!

But you've just proven what gnasher has been telling you, for several posts, correct.

Edited September 10, 2023 by shaaark

[mC HULL 12,815]

1 hour ago, Blackmag said:

Were in any other weight division is there such a size and weight difference than what's in the heavys  there isn't mc and I see other boxers undefeated champions putting there record on the line against other undefeated champions to secure there legacy why doesn't fury he's enough money he could go down in history but no it's all about coin and protecting the no loss record 

in case you haven’t noticed mate fury is the only heavyweight to win a world title from an undefeated world champion in the full division 

[mC HULL 12,815]

6 minutes ago, shaaark said:

Gooey, I don't know if you are actually aware of what you're writing?!

But you've just proven what gnasher has been telling you, for several threads, correct.

what i’m saying is fury is a handful for any heavyweight regardless of era shaark 

it’s no good saying it’s because of this or that

i’m looking at the full picture he is a heavyweight world champion who would beat plenty of greats from any era 

 

[keepdiggin 9,561]

Strickland beating Izzy in ufc was a huge shock 

[mC HULL 12,815]

Just now, keepdiggin said:

Strickland beating Izzy in ufc was a huge shock 

great wasn’t it cant stand izzy 

[keepdiggin 9,561]

Just now, mC HULL said:

great wasn’t it cant stand izzy 

I do like that Strickland he says what most are thinking 

[jukel123 8,244]

Just now, mC HULL said:

in case you haven’t noticed mate fury is the only heavyweight to win a world title from an undefeated world champion in the full division 

How do you think Ali would have fared against Fury? I remember Brian London, who was totally outclassed by Ali, saying that fighting Ali was " the greatest honour of his life". Personally, I think Ali would have beaten Fury comfortably. And if Fury had any class at all, he should repeat what London said.

[mC HULL 12,815]

Just now, keepdiggin said:

I do like that Strickland he says what most are thinking 

character isn’t he and can be funny with it aswell 

watched it on youtube bits this morning wait a few days for a good upload and watch full fight