king 11,984 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) So you are saying the terrier boys deserve a beating off baseball wielding sabs.you total anti prick So you are saying the terrier boys deserve a beating off baseball wielding sabs.you total anti prickNo, that's what you are saying......unless you are confused or it's only your definition of cruelty that counts in the world Wilf you are a knob end of.Well if you think it ain't cruelty then that's that. Edited April 1, 2016 by king Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,505 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 So you are saying the terrier boys deserve a beating off baseball wielding sabs.you total anti prick So you are saying the terrier boys deserve a beating off baseball wielding sabs.you total anti prick No, that's what you are saying......unless you are confused or it's only your definition of cruelty that counts in the world Wilf you are a knob end of. No I'm honest enough to be upfront about dog work, I dont ask forgiveness or apologise or bulshit that I am some holier than thou f***ing Angel.......in dog work dogs get injured, sometimes badly injured. I don't see that as cruel, but many others would so who the f**k am I to pronounce sentence on these two shitbags however much I detest what they have done. Let he who is without sin cast the first f***ing stone........know what I mean 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 Let he who is without sin cast the first f***ing stone........know what I mean No I don't know what you mean.i don't follow the bible so don't understand the jargon. Know what I mean... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,505 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 So you have that terrier there but you have never actually had it in the ground, is that what you are telling me?.......because if it is, then I can understand why you don't get it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I think there is a difference between a dog doing what it wants to do and what it is bred to do, and someone jumping up and down on top of a dog.. Now, if an individual decided to take some action on what is the latter, who else would know to judge on what he had done? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king 11,984 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 So you have that terrier there but you have never actually had it in the ground, is that what you are telling me?.......because if it is, then I can understand why you don't get it.Wilf I've got things going on here that you are no one else on this site will be told.It's got nothing to do with that terrier in the pic. It's to do with the 2 lads who smashed that dog up. And what does my head in is that you think the punishment the courts dished out was ok. A dog to ground is a legal thing to do. Beating a dog and throwing it down the stairs is morally wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I terrier of a lurcher can walk off its quarry whenever it wants ... That poor fukcing mut couldn't ..... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 If you don't like it, do something about it. Just don't get caught! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,505 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I think there is a difference between a dog doing what it wants to do and what it is bred to do, and someone jumping up and down on top of a dog.. Now, if an individual decided to take some action on what is the latter, who else would know to judge on what he had done? I agree, there is a massive difference mate but not everyone would see it that way and I'm not catching the fanny bus to Fannyville and joining their club of outraged gobshites........I have mates who have had their family's and kids targeted by antis because of nonsense such as this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,505 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I terrier of a lurcher can walk off its quarry whenever it wants ... That poor fukcing mut couldn't ..... Also true mate......but there are also dogs that won't so so they get left at home? No, of course they don't ......they are ones that folk want to breed off. I don't need to tell a bloke like you that, and I also hope I don't need to tell you that I think those two clowns were in any way right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I terrier of a lurcher can walk off its quarry whenever it wants ... That poor fukcing mut couldn't ..... Also true mate......but there are also dogs that won't so so they get left at home? No, of course they don't ......they are ones that folk want to breed off. I don't need to tell a bloke like you that, and I also hope I don't need to tell you that I think those two clowns were in any way right. I know you don't think that but I think your not coming accros the way you mean ... We have all had hard dogs that you wouldn't drop into certain places as you know it's going to take you a long time to get to them and any man that does is no different to that pair of filth .... But what they did is on a different level ...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,505 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 Fair play Socks, I can't say I have ever owned a hard dog but I have owned a stupid dog and that's almost worse. Anyway, I will leave the torches and pitchforks to those with a taste for that game.......it's not me I'm afraid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
C556 351 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 I think there is a difference between a dog doing what it wants to do and what it is bred to do, and someone jumping up and down on top of a dog.. Now, if an individual decided to take some action on what is the latter, who else would know to judge on what he had done? I agree, there is a massive difference mate but not everyone would see it that way and I'm not catching the fanny bus to Fannyville and joining their club of outraged gobshites........I have mates who have had their family's and kids targeted by antis because of nonsense such as this. I generally agree with you. It is unfortunate when the law seems to fail and people take things into their own hands. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MOLE265 792 Posted April 1, 2016 Report Share Posted April 1, 2016 The replies are enough for me ain't opening up the link don't want that in my head. Stick the feckers in the ring with a couple of boxers or cage fighters see how they like it bet they would be howling for there mammy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted April 2, 2016 Report Share Posted April 2, 2016 If the rspca targeted genuine cases of animal cruelty like this i would support them, unfortunately they are greedy, corrupt and manipulative and they use lies and propaganda to influence as many people as possible to generate as much profit as possible. Therefore i will not sign any petition associated with them. People who compare this to hunting have no idea about hunting or cruelty and it is a shame hunters even have to worry what these misinformed fools think. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.