Queen

[mud 2,044]

............

Edited March 28, 2016 by mud

[bendrover 556]

Could be worse could be sheltering a shit load of kiddie fiddlers GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

you lowering the tone AGAIN . sad people joke of such crimes .

[fifeman 164]

Another one bites the dust was my favourite

[MIK 4,763]

So say at home bored watching some rubbish about the queen made me think why is she so special why are the Royal Family so special after all it all boils down to this simple thing we all started of the same in life just beacuse some adverage jack back in time decided they will claim to be royal load of crap there the same people as everyone nothing special song understand the hype for them

Prince Charles should be PM

[j j m 6,560]

i like the queen,lots of countrys would love to have a royal family like we do

[MIK 4,763]

 

Could be worse could be sheltering a shit load of kiddie fiddlers GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

you lowering the tone AGAIN . sad people joke of such crimes .

 

Very predictable from that lot ...zzzzzzzzzz

[Truther 1,579]

Maybe the Yanks should crown Walt Disney..........Visitors to Disneyland must bring in billions?

[king 11,984]

I'm not that bothered about the royal family.

But the millions of tourists that come here mainy to see were they live etc.has got to be good for the economy.

The old saying is.

You don't know what you got till its gone.

And I've realised that a good few times in life..

[shepp 2,285]

I doubt the Royal Estates would run as well in the governments hands, plus a Labour government would probably ban hunting on them and turn stately homes into 'refugee' accommodation.

[tb25 4,627]

Is it true she's some sort of lizard?

[jacknife 2,005]

For me there part of being English and British....one of the last remnants left from when we could use the Great before Britain so I like them

 

Better them than the American royal family the talentless fat arse Kardashians that get everyone,exited when they come to town

[Truther 1,579]

I doubt the Royal Estates would run as well in the governments hands, plus a Labour government would probably ban hunting on them and turn stately homes into 'refugee' accommodation.

 

Hunting is banned on all estates, unless you're royal/gentry...........what f***ing use it that to any of us?

[bird 9,982]

 

I doubt the Royal Estates would run as well in the governments hands, plus a Labour government would probably ban hunting on them and turn stately homes into 'refugee' accommodation.

 

Hunting is banned on all estates, unless you're royal/gentry...........what f***ing use it that to any of us?

 

i thought they still shoot few birds, iknow they dont ride out with hounds no more , but still shoot

[Malt 379]

The Queen has no power now. Blame the bloody politicians.

The Queen/crown holds all the power, its just she is bound from using it herself and it is wielded by 'her' government on behalf. On paper as head of state as so many countries around the world, she is the most powerful person on the planet..

[shepp 2,285]

 

I doubt the Royal Estates would run as well in the governments hands, plus a Labour government would probably ban hunting on them and turn stately homes into 'refugee' accommodation.

 

Hunting is banned on all estates, unless you're royal/gentry...........what f***ing use it that to any of us?

It sets a presidence, maintains countryside in the best way possible and gives people employment.