Hares & Foxes

[king 11,980]

It seems that talking about hunting hares.coursing catching 2 from 3 is acceptable.

But talk about hunting fox is a no no.

Why is that.....

[General lee 979]

Best use the mi5 are watching in coalition with the anti brigade and they will take you down

[low plains drifter 10,677]

Fox meat would be an unwelcome ingredient to a game pie

[walshie 2,804]

Depends where it took place and when. And just adding "pre-ban" and "retrieved" doesn't make it legal. Especially when there is a picture of a new motor in the background and not a gun in sight.

[king 11,980]

Ah right walshie got you mate.

[logan 447]

A

Depends where it took place and when. And just adding "pre-ban" and "retrieved" doesn't make it legal. Especially when there is a picture of a new motor in the background and not a gun in sight.

and dogs that are 18months old ,.when its been banned since 2004 ,

[Wales1234 5,546]

A

Depends where it took place and when. And just adding "pre-ban" and "retrieved" doesn't make it legal. Especially when there is a picture of a new motor in the background and not a gun in sight.

and dogs that are 18months old ,.when its been banned since 2004 ,

I laugh at this few weeks ago someone was saying there dogs 18 months then a picture of the same dog with illegal quarry saying pre ban lol

[low plains drifter 10,677]

 

A

Depends where it took place and when. And just adding "pre-ban" and "retrieved" doesn't make it legal. Especially when there is a picture of a new motor in the background and not a gun in sight.

and dogs that are 18months old ,.when its been banned since 2004 ,

I laugh at this few weeks ago someone was saying there dogs 18 months then a picture of the same dog with illegal quarry saying pre ban lol

Did'nt you know Dr Emmett Brown is a dedicated lurcherman ?

[walshie 2,804]

Thing is, when you tell these numpties, they get all stroppy and normally say "This is a hunting site."

[low plains drifter 10,677]

 

 

A

Depends where it took place and when. And just adding "pre-ban" and "retrieved" doesn't make it legal. Especially when there is a picture of a new motor in the background and not a gun in sight.

and dogs that are 18months old ,.when its been banned since 2004 ,

I laugh at this few weeks ago someone was saying there dogs 18 months then a picture of the same dog with illegal quarry saying pre ban lol

Did'nt you know Dr Emmett Brown is a dedicated lurcherman ?

And he's got NL&RC, and f**k the ban stickers all over the back window of the Delorean

[paulsmithy83 567]

Thing is, when you tell these numpties, they get all stroppy and normally say "This is a hunting site."

once therasa may bill becomes live any one be mad to post anything potentially illegal as police will have new powers to legally hack you to find out your home address. plus all pics prity much are embedded with code. which states time, date and location picture was took. big brother is certainly watching ever so more. plus it fuels the antis

[the trunk 2,859]

Lads from northern will talk about on post but they watch what pictures is put up but most just dont think for example that deer post lads putting pictures up not helping

[walshie 2,804]

It's almost getting like a sport in its own right now - trying to get dodgy pics up before the moderators spot them. Some are deliberately posting in the discussion section instead of the write ups to bypass the need to be approved. Others are just really thick and want a knock at the door.

[spiderfly 111]

Why is Facebook full of pictures of lads lamping hares? Surely people don't think that's sport?