Summens To Court .

[logan 447]

Cheers for Clives number mad4it, spoke to him yesterday he reckons that doing me under the wrong act there doing me under the salmon act because basically they have left it to long under the cray fish act wich they only have 6 months to proscute you so there trying to blag it by the sounds of things ,

[Deker 3,478]

I'm not making a specific comment about the "offence", but simply pointing out a Crayfish licence and tags are FREE, you just need to fill out the paperwork and send it off.

 

[logan 447]

Ano that now pal but the damage is alredy done.

[bell 3,606]

Cheers for Clives number mad4it, spoke to him yesterday he reckons that doing me under the wrong act there doing me under the salmon act because basically they have left it to long under the cray fish act wich they only have 6 months to proscute you so there trying to blag it by the sounds of things ,

I told you that in my first post mate, should have pm'd me, could have sorted it for you......

[logan 447]

 

Cheers for Clives number mad4it, spoke to him yesterday he reckons that doing me under the wrong act there doing me under the salmon act because basically they have left it to long under the cray fish act wich they only have 6 months to proscute you so there trying to blag it by the sounds of things ,

I told you that in my first post mate, should have pm'd me, could have sorted it for you......

cheere pal i should have .

[logan 447]

for the lads that were intrested it was court day today I got 12 conditional discharge and 120 pound fine another load of the tax payers money wasted for 120 pound, if spent more on the ice cream van don't you just love the filth ,lol

[logan 447]

the environment service had there bill added up to 7500 and they didn't get jack shit so not a bad result I was happy ,

[Deker 3,478]

What do you want, sympathy, you just cost me and other tax payers a load of money, and that ****** me off!

 

Yes its daft, ridiculous and seemingly hardly in the public interest.

 

So perhaps you would be kind enough to get a licence, which costs nothing, rather than Joe Public having £7500 of tax wasted prosecuting you.

 

Thank you!

Edited April 12, 2016 by Deker

[logan 447]

Like i sed for the lads that are intrested keep your beak out you prick .

[logan 447]

Jesus there is some plebs on here that amused me that prick lol

[air gun ant 1,666]

If I was to get somwhere new and catch a few signals, I wouldn't be putting them back.............

And if I ended up in court for it I'd be pretty pissedof to lol

[logan 447]

Every body thinks its easy to just go get a licence then bang your away catching kray fish it doesnt work like that you need land owners permission then you need to apply to the enviroment service to catch them them if there is any chance ov our own kray fish been in that river you might as well forget it ,so for that prick just saying go get a licence hes clueless go do some more research.

[Deker 3,478]

Every body thinks its easy to just go get a licence then bang your away catching kray fish it doesnt work like that you need land owners permission then you need to apply to the enviroment service to catch them them if there is any chance ov our own kray fish been in that river you might as well forget it ,so for that prick just saying go get a licence hes clueless go do some more research.

 

Oh right, so that makes it ok then does it?

 

I have a licence and I do it legally, like I said, you broke the law and you cost me and other tax payers a load of money, and that ****** me off.

 

Breaking the law because its a bit inconvenient for you, and some land owners may say no is tuff, that's what the rest of us have to do. The Environment Agency licence/tags costs nothing, the licence is in place to protect our native crayfish, and asking permission is nothing new.

 

Strikes me you have no regard for conservation, the law or landowners.

 

Call me what you like, you are the inconsiderate one.

Edited April 13, 2016 by Deker

[Rabid 1,936]

Every body thinks its easy to just go get a licence then bang your away catching kray fish it doesnt work like that you need land owners permission then you need to apply to the enviroment service to catch them them if there is any chance ov our own kray fish been in that river you might as well forget it ,so for that prick just saying go get a licence hes clueless go do some more research.

That's rich telling him to go do some research, your the one who didn't know you needed a licence that is free ! Yeah it's harsh what they done to you, and may not even be in the best interest to have prosecuted you, but that's the law pal, and had you done some research yourself you would have known that and could have avoided it all !

 

Am with decker on this, I researched it, I got the licence, and landowners permission, no reason not to do it.

 

Oh and for the record, it's easy to gain permission for crays, every fishing club in the country wants them gone, I have clubs approaching me asking to trap their stretches of water, and if they have bought the fishing rights then they can legally give you permission !

 

One of the waters I trap holds native crays, yet I still got permission from the EA, it's about knowing which one is what, so that doesn't automatically rule you out either