Treehands 1,417 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Never a question of the dog going to ground without a collar, but there is the option on moderate depth earths to not turn to it for help but instead try a bit of fieldcraft first , and if you struggle just flick the switch an hey presto. As Morton said , some places have great depth and a collar would be of no use. But you could still hear a terrier baying. My old man chastised me in my young days for putting a dog to ground with a collar on , his mindset was the dog hooking up on roots, old habits die hard as they say. Electric devices make things easy but not always better imo. I also would like to revisit the past , but only with me knocker box. Atb ...th... 2 Quote Link to post
morton 5,368 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 (edited) Never a question of the dog going to ground without a collar, but there is the option on moderate depth earths to not turn to it for help but instead try a bit of fieldcraft first , and if you struggle just flick the switch an hey presto. As Morton said , some places have great depth and a collar would be of no use. But you could still hear a terrier baying. My old man chastised me in my young days for putting a dog to ground with a collar on , his mindset was the dog hooking up on roots, old habits die hard as they say. Electric devices make things easy but not always better imo. I also would like to revisit the past , but only with me knocker box. Atb ...th... Some of the rocks ive put terriers in you never hear a muff,ever,You excavated until you did or waited.The amount of rock piles around here that are known by the time it took a dog to come out,4 day hold,9 and 10 day hold etc.These names have gone down through many generations of terrier folk,at times more modern. Edited March 6, 2016 by morton 2 Quote Link to post
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Used to be the argument that dog would get hung up but never seen one like it despite collars getting tougher,thicker 1 Quote Link to post
morton 5,368 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Used to be the argument that dog would get hung up but never seen one like it despite collars getting tougher,thicker Id not put a collar on a dog in rock,its not the collar that snags its the electronic pack and ive had dogs snagged because of it in rocks,it certainly restricts their ability to squeeze through the limits of their frame,at times. Quote Link to post
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Ive no experience of rocks mate but sounds good advice .Got to be honest ,would scare shit out of me putting dog in rocks .Dogs for occasions i guess i respect that . 2 Quote Link to post
morton 5,368 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Ive no experience of rocks mate but sounds good advice .Got to be honest ,would scare shit out of me putting dog in rocks .Dogs for occasions i guess i respect that . The reality of a terriers working life in some parts of the country,especially were the Fell,Border,Bedlington,Lakey etc. were founded was rocks was the mainstay of their working heritage and breeding,the same reality now that i have issue with is that the majority of these same terriers now are ill equipped to work the places they were bred for,their conformation and working character as been basterdised to suit a shovel,a collar and the average terrier worker about now,the majority of modern bred uns were culls not to long ago. 1 Quote Link to post
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 A stayer never been a cull down south mate ,just where digging wasnt an option up north. 1 Quote Link to post
morton 5,368 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 A stayer never been a cull down south mate ,just where digging wasnt an option up north. Size mucker,modern terriers are far bulkier than their working heritage made them to be,Dales and Fell dogs were bred to work the terrain they were born to,thus size was paramount and big was useless,as was mute and full frontal.Lakey,s,Fells and black uns now are grafted away from their heritage and are nearly useless going back home,i find this an utter travesty that folk now recognise as the norm,modern norms are olden culls,for a very good reason.Fit for purpose is nothing to do with modern breeding or work ethic,it was the norm then. 3 Quote Link to post
dillydog 8,463 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Plenty of lumps in this picture, it's a mates grandfather on a fox drive in Ludlow. 8 Quote Link to post
morton 5,368 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Plenty of lumps in this picture, it's a mates grandfather on a fox drive in Ludlow. Impossible to tell from a pic,as many of the dog where higher on the leg then it may suggest bulk,that was seldom the case,very seldom. Quote Link to post
dillydog 8,463 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 I could make an educated guess Morton, I'm long enough in the tooth to have a rough idea 1 Quote Link to post
Waz 4,266 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Plenty of lumps in this picture, it's a mates grandfather on a fox drive in Ludlow. Impossible to tell from a pic,as many of the dog where higher on the leg then it may suggest bulk,that was seldom the case,very seldom. May of meant the men? 1 Quote Link to post
rob284 1,682 Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Ive no experience of rocks mate but sounds good advice .Got to be honest ,would scare shit out of me putting dog in rocks .Dogs for occasions i guess i respect that . The reality of a terriers working life in some parts of the country,especially were the Fell,Border,Bedlington,Lakey etc. were founded was rocks was the mainstay of their working heritage and breeding,the same reality now that i have issue with is that the majority of these same terriers now are ill equipped to work the places they were bred for,their conformation and working character as been basterdised to suit a shovel,a collar and the average terrier worker about now,the majority of modern bred uns were culls not to long ago."the majority of modern bred uns were culls not to long ago." You talking about modern earthdogs or modern rock dogs, because you wouldnt expect a modern bred earthdog of earthworking parents to excel at working rocks, same as you wouldnt 50 years ago. I dont understand the point your making. Quote Link to post
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted March 7, 2016 Report Share Posted March 7, 2016 What's Mortons saying ,and I get it ,is that the breeds most popular today ,fell type and pats were originally bred in the lakes of the borders and the north used to bolt or kill foxes in rocks .Since they were adopted down south a bulkier harder more bully type is favoured rather than a lithe bolter capable of despacthing a fox in rocks having first got to it .I agree that many of today's terriers are more boned than I've seen pictures of but I would also argue that it was the breeders of those lithe types that help breed away from type by adding bull all those years ago . 1 Quote Link to post
pablo esc 1,598 Posted March 7, 2016 Report Share Posted March 7, 2016 You only need soft dogs fd, as we know, dig once and kill, the game Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.