BGD 6,436 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles.Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles. Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before judge reinder Is that the poof on ITV in the morning? What's he got to do with it? Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles. Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before judge reinder Is that the poof on ITV in the morning? What's he got to do with it? the way you put that you would of swore you were him I need to see some proof of that ffs makes you weep lmao You go around blindly believing wild claims with no proof? Well more fool you then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles.Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group if they are British on benefits the rent is would be paid when a tenant is in a property these properties the rent is paid regardless as they have to be ready at short notice sometimes the bus may turn up at midnight with asylum seekers and the government/local authorities have to house them immediately Plus these properties will not be offered to British people Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 (edited) Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles.Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group if they are British on benefits the rent is would be paid when a tenant is in a property these properties the rent is paid regardless as they have to be ready at short notice sometimes the bus may turn up at midnight with asylum seekers and the government/local authorities have to house them immediately Now you're claiming the councils pay these landlords rent for empty properties just incase they need them? That's ridiculous, they dont even do that for the emergency accomdation they keep on standby. Surely you've got proof to back up such an outlandish claim? Also I'd appreciate it if you'd explain why they bother to advertise these properties that won't accept HB if they're "reserved" for refugees? Surely that's just a waste of time, they'd just be waiting for the council to place refugees with them? Edited November 17, 2015 by BGD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Squirrel_Basher 17,100 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Hes right mate .Its now European law every country has to put aside emergency housing .How countries do it is up to them ,ours chooses to rent empty houses from the private sector.Fecking disgrace . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles.Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group if they are British on benefits the rent is would be paid when a tenant is in a property these properties the rent is paid regardless as they have to be ready at short notice sometimes the bus may turn up at midnight with asylum seekers and the government/local authorities have to house them immediately Now you're claiming the councils pay these landlords rent for empty properties just incase they need them? That's ridiculous, they dont even do that for the emergency accomdation they keep on standby. Surely you've got proof to back up such an outlandish claim? In these parts emergency accommodation is council owned What is so outlandish about it......just because you don't believe Its not just in case they need them they do need them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
villaman 9,983 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 I feel sorry for them ,they have to tolerate the Scott's 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nothernlite 18,089 Posted November 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles. Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group if they are British on benefits the rent is would be paid when a tenant is in a property these properties the rent is paid regardless as they have to be ready at short notice sometimes the bus may turn up at midnight with asylum seekers and the government/local authorities have to house them immediately Now you're claiming the councils pay these landlords rent for empty properties just incase they need them? That's ridiculous, they dont even do that for the emergency accomdation they keep on standby. Surely you've got proof to back up such an outlandish claim? In these parts emergency accommodation is council owned What is so outlandish about it......just because you don't believe Its not just in case they need them they do need them he needs to see proof ffs get the documents for the man lmao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Sad to say but I have said it several times many of you Scottish lads have not known what this infiltration/infestation is like, I said it was coming I just didn't realise how soon it would be... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,493 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Aye they won't understand the accent and after there first winter. Half of them will want to go back lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,400 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 I feel sorry for them ,they have to tolerate the Scott's I feel sorry for them ,they have to tolerate the Scott's Scots, one t, no apostrophe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 Wouldn't know that maybe no dhss welcome like most If its like around here those houses are reserved for Asylum seekers/Refugees whatever there called I deliver beds to many such homes on a weekly bases Normally the houses are owned by landlords who have properties in the hundreds........They get more rent than they would if the tenant was say a British family If they pay more than the British families then obviously the landlords are going to rent to them, that's basic free market principles.Unless you're implying the council pay higher rates of housing benefit for the refugee families in which case I'd need to see some proof because I've never heard of that before They get more rent as all the properties are multiple occupancy...............Very few asylum/refugees are families the vast majority are single some couples A normal 3 bed house that may rent for £400 a month will become a 4 bed house using the lounge and each room is rented out They tend to keep same nationalities together And it's only refugees that live in HMOs? :laugh: No its not only asylum seekers living in these type of properties That doesn't mean that hundreds of these types of properties are not reserved for asylum seekers only But you said they get more money for renting them to refugees, if they can chop the properties up into HMOs and rent them out to native British folk (as you say yourself native Brits also live in HMOs) then they'd be making the same amount of money from renting to either group if they are British on benefits the rent is would be paid when a tenant is in a property these properties the rent is paid regardless as they have to be ready at short notice sometimes the bus may turn up at midnight with asylum seekers and the government/local authorities have to house them immediately Now you're claiming the councils pay these landlords rent for empty properties just incase they need them? That's ridiculous, they dont even do that for the emergency accomdation they keep on standby. Surely you've got proof to back up such an outlandish claim? In these parts emergency accommodation is council owned What is so outlandish about it......just because you don't believe Its not just in case they need them they do need them It's outlandish because I know for a fact you're talking bollocks. See I used to rent out rooms as emergency accomdation to the council and guess what, I didn't get paid if there were no tenants. Of course you'd know better than someone that's actually been involved in the business because you've delivered beds to some private HMOs You obviously missed my edit so here it is again, would be nice to have it explained to me because it doesn't make any sense - Also I'd appreciate it if you'd explain why they bother to advertise these properties that won't accept HB if they're "reserved" for refugees? Surely that's just a waste of time, they'd just be waiting for the council to place refugees with them? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 These are not emergency rooms for the council they are part of a home office dispersal policy No i don't just deliver bed to them These properties are never advertised anywhere Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 These are not emergency rooms for the council they are part of a government dispersal policy No i don't just deliver bed to them These properties are never advertised anywhere So these aren't the properties nothernlite was talking about that have "NO DHSS" in the ad then. So what the feck were you going on about? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 These are not emergency rooms for the council they are part of a government dispersal policy No i don't just deliver bed to them These properties are never advertised anywhere So these aren't the properties nothernlite was talking about that have "NO DHSS" in the ad then. So what the feck were you going on about? He wasnt sure what type of properties they were i just said if they are like the properties here Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.