trigger2 3,145 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 i think alot of people have also stopped posting because of the bitching from other members. ive banned bird from taking photos lol 2 Quote Link to post
no 1 charly sniffer 6 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. don't want to start arguement but I think your wrong ,in this country they have to prove your guilt don't they??my ould mam yous say me ,its nay what they know its what they cane prove 1 Quote Link to post
low plains drifter 10,493 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. How would they go about finding your adress over this? With a phone not being registered to ones self ? They'd get Sherlock Bond on the case with his van full of radars, scanners and pouches of baccy. Just keep an eye out for a deerstalker,tuxedo wearing transit van driver 1 Quote Link to post
Gaz_1989 9,539 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. That's fair enough then. Didn't realise the site owner had made such a request. It's an odd request, but one we must respect I suppose. Can a catapult be used to shoot hare at close range and send the dogs to retrieve? Lol 1 Quote Link to post
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 even if its legal he does not want it on the site. Fair play if the owner doesnt want it on the site its his site Quote Link to post
no 1 charly sniffer 6 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 even if its legal he does not want it on the site. Fair play if the owner doesnt want it on the site its his site dad has a collie dog that ratches a few conie Quote Link to post
General lee 979 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 I don't want to start an argument and I don't want to stoke the embers of a potential argument but I feel as a site we are starting to get to afraid to post anything that the anti brigade may use against us .... Now it is completely legal to flush a hare to a waiting gun with up to two dogs if you are on permission with the land owners consent ... So with that in mind it must therefore be completely legal to have a picture with one or two dogs behind a hare that are flushing said hare toward the waiting guns ... It is not always possible to get dogs hare and shooters in the same picture so inevitably you will have pictures of only dogs and hare in one frame carrying out a completely legal activity ... Let's not get so afraid of the antis that we can't even post a legal picture for fear of reprisal, if we do then we just as well give it all up as they are winning and slowly but surely eroding our freedom and way of life ........... I completely agree its gone to far with people being scared to post anything it's a hunting site and if it is legal why not post some pictures within the site owners guidelines of course Quote Link to post
paulus 26 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. don't want to start arguement but I think your wrong ,in this country they have to prove your guilt don't they?? posted the pictures all over FB http://www.thehuntinglife.com/forums/topic/349345-hare-coursing-in-ireland/ Quote Link to post
socks 32,253 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. Then Ian is doing a massive disservice to lurcher owners and the members of this site ... Without all the members he wouldn't earn the coin he does from THL ........ 2 Quote Link to post
no 1 charly sniffer 6 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 missed most of today, but the owner of the site said the other year that only photo`s that contain a gun of BOP within the picture will be allowed, again with graphic content even if its legal he does not want it on the site. if you want to post these types of pictures the the internet is full of places but just be mindful that someone may give you a knock and ask you to prove your story and that may well cause you a great deal of grief. Then Ian is doing a massive disservice to lurcher owners and the members of this site ... Without all the members he wouldn't earn the coin he does from THL ........ here here here here Quote Link to post
stormyboy 1,352 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 Bear in mind, if you get your doors put in because of pictures on the net they will take your dogs,at least until if and when it goes to court. And pictures can and will be used as evidence. If anyone thinks a magistrate, possibly land owning, or worse still a city bred jury isn't going to be swayed by blatantly incriminating photos of hares or deer,they're deluding themselves. It is nice to see photos of hunting but it's a new age now and 'pre ban' caption isn't going to save your arse if you provide the evidence! Just my opinion. 2 Quote Link to post
air gun ant 1,666 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 I do remember the little shake up on pics, and showing women's bottoms and breasts etc Wasn't it more to do with the sites sponsers than Ian personally? Although as you say socks, no sponsers means no coin which will most likely = no THL... Quote Link to post
no 1 charly sniffer 6 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 I will dig some pictures out of old shep dads collie dog 7 rabbits in one persuit if i remember correctly Quote Link to post
Ideation 8,216 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 The problem with what your saying socks is it may be legal but unless you show the gun in another photo it would be used as proof you broke the law Nonsense. How can a photo tell how an animal was killed? I could take photos of my dogs with road kill deer and plaster them all over the net. They couldn't do a bean. Apart from smash through your door and pull your house and kennels apart looking for 'proof' of wrong doing. Worse than that, wankers that they are, they could probably have your dogs taken until things were 'clarified',. . . . .and we all know what happens when they RSPCA have your dogs even under false pretences. Lets not bull shit ladies and gents, a lot of us do some ever so slightly naughty things. . . . . so drawing unnecessary attention by being a smart arse on the net and looking for other people to 'like' your post is probably a wee bit daft! I know its a terrible thing, but thats life! It always makes me chuckle when you get lads off lamping or coursing etc. . . . no permission. . . . . photos of dead hare, deer etc. . . . and they say shot and retrieved! And yet none of the lads out have a sgc or fac. . . . . And I bet if old bill raided their house and lifted their computer, phone etc and went through the freezer, they would be in a world of shit! Me. . . . . I just want a quiet life! 8 Quote Link to post
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted October 29, 2015 Report Share Posted October 29, 2015 I do remember the little shake up on pics, and showing women's bottoms and breasts etc Wasn't it more to do with the sites sponsers than Ian personally? Although as you say socks, no sponsers means no coin which will most likely = no THL... no sponsers means no coin which will most likely = no THL... why, other sites manage without sponsers and adverts Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.