villaman 9,983 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 I CAN DO THE SAME WITH BOTH CALS , BUT I ONLY HAVE ONE SPRINGER IN.177 AND 5 IN .22 , SO ITS .22 FOR ME 1 Quote Link to post
bigmac 97kt 13,796 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 I CAN DO THE SAME WITH BOTH CALS , BUT I ONLY HAVE ONE SPRINGER IN.177 AND 5 IN .22 , SO ITS .22 FOR ME I see your back you twat Did you have a good one bud atvbmac :thumbs: Quote Link to post
ryanod90 17 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 tx200 for me is .22 1 Quote Link to post
villaman 9,983 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 I CAN DO THE SAME WITH BOTH CALS , BUT I ONLY HAVE ONE SPRINGER IN.177 AND 5 IN .22 , SO ITS .22 FOR ME I see your back you twat Did you have a good one bud atvbmac :thumbs: Yes mate i did , great place to go all though very tiring 1 Quote Link to post
mark williams 7,558 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 Jonnie the original question- which calibre springer do you prefer? Please type into the small search engine (top right of this page) ------ Tx 200 Hc .177 At Work - this is a typical shooting photo with the .177 cal. (type letter for letter,capital for capital) (although you have seen this) atb 1 Quote Link to post
philpot 5,003 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 Makes me wonder why there are so few .20 guns/users around because logic would say that this cal is a happy medium of the other two, better trajectory than a .22, better penetration than a .177 but perhaps not. I have to say that I have never seen one let alone used one so pure speculation on my part...............................i'll get me coat.. Phil Quote Link to post
jonnie bravo 572 Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 With the larger cal being smoother to shoot, do you think you could customise a hw80 to be very powerful but smooth in .25? Say like 40-50ft lbs Quote Link to post
villaman 9,983 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 Makes me wonder why there are so few .20 guns/users around because logic would say that this cal is a happy medium of the other two, better trajectory than a .22, better penetration than a .177 but perhaps not. I have to say that I have never seen one let alone used one so pure speculation on my part...............................i'll get me coat.. Phil I have said it before and probably say it again , what is the point of .20 when you have very good heavy pellets in .177 and some very good pellets light pellets in .22 Quote Link to post
villaman 9,983 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 With the larger cal being smoother to shoot, do you think you could customise a hw80 to be very powerful but smooth in .25? Say like 40-50ft lbs I think you would find it will have such a kick on it , may be 22-24 ft/lb would do the job 1 Quote Link to post
Lazytreemonkey 4 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 22 any day 1 Quote Link to post
philpot 5,003 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 (edited) Makes me wonder why there are so few .20 guns/users around because logic would say that this cal is a happy medium of the other two, better trajectory than a .22, better penetration than a .177 but perhaps not. I have to say that I have never seen one let alone used one so pure speculation on my part...............................i'll get me coat.. Phil I have said it before and probably say it again , what is the point of .20 when you have very good heavy pellets in .177 and some very good pellets light pellets in .22 If you look at five words in my post----------PURE SPECULATION ON MY PART. I was not suggesting we all go and buy a .20 cal gun, simply bringing it into the discussion. Edited October 30, 2015 by philpot Quote Link to post
villaman 9,983 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 Makes me wonder why there are so few .20 guns/users around because logic would say that this cal is a happy medium of the other two, better trajectory than a .22, better penetration than a .177 but perhaps not. I have to say that I have never seen one let alone used one so pure speculation on my part...............................i'll get me coat.. Phil I have said it before and probably say it again , what is the point of .20 when you have very good heavy pellets in .177 and some very good pellets light pellets in .22 If you look at five words in my post----------PURE SPECULATION ON MY PART. I was not suggesting we all go and buy a .20 cal gun, simply bringing it into the discussion. AND I HAVE ANSWERED YOUR POST ABOUT 20 CAL IMO Quote Link to post
jonnie bravo 572 Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 I bet it would have a right kick as well. I bet a .25 doing 800fps on a springer would be a lot of fun though. Quote Link to post
philpot 5,003 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 (edited) Makes me wonder why there are so few .20 guns/users around because logic would say that this cal is a happy medium of the other two, better trajectory than a .22, better penetration than a .177 but perhaps not. I have to say that I have never seen one let alone used one so pure speculation on my part...............................i'll get me coat.. Phil I have said it before and probably say it again , what is the point of .20 when you have very good heavy pellets in .177 and some very good pellets light pellets in .22 If you look at five words in my post----------PURE SPECULATION ON MY PART. I was not suggesting we all go and buy a .20 cal gun, simply bringing it into the discussion. AND I HAVE ANSWERED YOUR POST ABOUT 20 CAL IMO Okay, fair comment. Please allow me to dig a little further into this out of ignorance not trying to be an arse but by using lighter .22 or heavier .177 pellets in order to get over the need for .20, would you tend to go with pellets that do not perform as well as your favoured pellets in terms of best grouping. I can completely understand your comment regarding the use of these different weight pellets in order to gain a certain advantage but in most cases would that not be at the expense of group size. I am still on a learning curve and will no doubt ask what is deemed to be a stupid question but I am really interested. Phil Edited October 30, 2015 by philpot Quote Link to post
mattybugeye 884 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 argh simples ,.177 needs more air thus higher faster sweep rate thus harder recoil and snappier shoot .22 less so less recoil smoother stroke less snappy which is best ffs i dont know spent 20 years trying to find out still dont know argh ooo brain fart just buy both then test for yourself ! yep tried that still dont know i give up absolutly no idea just just erm.......... 2 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.