Jump to content

Further Update On New Lurcher Association


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 650
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Call it sad if you like. . . . . . but to me, that just sounds like the defence of someone who doesn't like constructive criticism! These kind of bodies NEED to be questioned, so that answers can be f

I get it now... I think!! 2 groups, 1 new 1 old.. That can't get along and work as one for whatever the reasons may be?? ( perhaps we've ran out of acronyms ??)...So now the lurcher owners decide who

This younger generation (and they're not all young either) see what they do as a form of rebellion, or they're just that thick that they don't realise the implications of of what the do and say. They

Posted Images

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

 

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

Link to post

 

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

 

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

 

maybe the correct thing to do, would have been to contact this sites owner prior to posting links to your own sites or any others

Link to post

 

 

 

 

 

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

maybe the correct thing to do, would have been to contact this sites owner prior to posting links to your own sites or any others
If both clubs are working in the interest of lurchers why should there be a problem......or this one if them "us and them" type things?
Link to post

 

 

 

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

maybe the correct thing to do, would have been to contact this sites owner prior to posting links to your own sites or any others
If both clubs are working in the interest of lurchers why should there be a problem......or this one if them "us and them" type things?

 

not at all mate, but it is good manners to ask before jumping the gun.

Link to post

 

 

 

 

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

maybe the correct thing to do, would have been to contact this sites owner prior to posting links to your own sites or any others
If both clubs are working in the interest of lurchers why should there be a problem......or this one if them "us and them" type things?

 

not at all mate, but it is good manners to ask before jumping the gun.

 

:thumbs:

Link to post

I get it now... I think!!

2 groups, 1 new 1 old.. That can't get along and work as one for whatever the reasons may be?? ( perhaps we've ran out of acronyms ??)...So now the lurcher owners decide who to join, or we can join both..

Throw into the mix conflicting hunting forums, a big dose of face book, and there's ruffled feathers all round lol..

 

The only thing that baffles me a bit is why it wasn't until the new group came about were we all privvy to everything about the old group and its working, I would think this site is one of the biggest in the country ( by number of people) surely this should've been known by all, touting for members, monthly bulletins, maybe even a whole page on the site dedicated to workings of the organisation??

Just seems it was very low key until the new group came about, is it based on a who you know type basis?

  • Like 11
Link to post

 

 

 

 

no link to THL then :laugh::laugh::laugh:

edited to add, a bit rich that, given all the links you have put up on here to your site and FB page..........

No malice was intended, the web page designer ( if thats the correct word ) is not a member on here, So I am asking formally would You like, or Ian b like a link to the awl page?

maybe the correct thing to do, would have been to contact this sites owner prior to posting links to your own sites or any others
If both clubs are working in the interest of lurchers why should there be a problem......or this one if them "us and them" type things?

 

wow my heads mashed with all chatter,,,,one things for sure should we really be considering having two clubs,one big club moving forward would surely be beneficial to all lurchers and their owners

  • Like 2
Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...