johnny boy68 11,726 Posted September 16, 2015 Report Share Posted September 16, 2015 According to the rules all politicians have to swear an oath the monach after a general election or after the death of a monarch Has he sworn an oath to the queen ??? If he accepts a place on the Privy Council then he'll have to swear allegiance, what good is the opposition leader if he's not privy to these security briefings.I don't think its just the privy council.....its to be an MP and sit in parliament Theres two oaths one with God in the wording and one without God but both are an oath to the queen and the monarchs to follow Well BGD says that Corbyn's not an hypocrite so won't be kneeling, swearing allegiance or making any oaths to the monarchy. So how will this work if he's not going to do it?He's been an MP for 32 years, he would of sworn any oaths he had to swear a long time ago.So he is an hypocrite then lol, he's a republican when it suits him then. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 16, 2015 Report Share Posted September 16, 2015 The oaths are sworn at every election and a change of monarch So if I'm right he swore an oath to the Queen quite recently But I'm not 100% sure on the oath swearing thing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 16, 2015 Report Share Posted September 16, 2015 I think its quite funny seeing Corbyn disciples claiming this stuff in the papers is rubbish and trying to defend him The very same people didn't mind spreading the news stories about Farage 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted September 17, 2015 Report Share Posted September 17, 2015 Makes sense now It turns out Corbyn used to bone Diane Abbott in his youth..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted September 17, 2015 Report Share Posted September 17, 2015 Makes sense now It turns out Corbyn used to bone Diane Abbott in his youth..... Well he's game you've got to give him that. Don't think I'd have the stomach for it to be honest Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackay 3,399 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Corbyn has giving Lord Watson who is a convicted arsonist a front bench position. If that doesn't tell you how little support he genuinely has then nothing does. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,192 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Corbyn has giving Lord Watson who is a convicted arsonist a front bench position.If that doesn't tell you how little support he genuinely has then nothing does. He did 8 months inside for it and he's inside parliament, what an utter fcukin disgrace. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html What exactly has the national anthem go to do with rememberance day? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,436 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Corbyn has giving Lord Watson who is a convicted arsonist a front bench position.If that doesn't tell you how little support he genuinely has then nothing does.He did 8 months inside for it and he's inside parliament, what an utter fcukin disgrace. He's paid his debt to society now so what's the issue? Not like he's a nonce. He set fire to some curtains when he was pished, hardly the crime of the century, he didn't even hurt anyone and he did 8 months inside for it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tatsblisters 10,007 Posted September 18, 2015 Report Share Posted September 18, 2015 Corbyn has giving Lord Watson who is a convicted arsonist a front bench position. If that doesn't tell you how little support he genuinely has then nothing does. Good their becomeing more unelectable by the day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html What exactly has the national anthem go to do with rememberance day? The national anthem is sung at official events....just like most countries do This event was for the brave men and women who fought in the battle of Britain to save the united kingdom So they sing the National Anthem Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html What exactly has the national anthem go to do with rememberance day? The national anthem is sung at official events....just like most countries do This event was for the brave men and women who fought in the battle of Britain to save the united kingdom So they sing the National Anthem And i always though those brave men and women fought to keep GB a free country, a country where free speech was the right of every individual, it looks like you can't have a personal opinion that goes against the monarchy to me reading this.............A way bigger insult to those that died for freedom than corbyns refusal to sing an anthem. Its a free country supposedly, people have the right to not agree with anything they like, if not its not a free country and not worth fighting for, and other people have the right to condemn him for it, it goes both ways. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html What exactly has the national anthem go to do with rememberance day?The national anthem is sung at official events....just like most countries do This event was for the brave men and women who fought in the battle of Britain to save the united kingdom So they sing the National Anthem And i always though those brave men and women fought to keep GB a free country, a country where free speech was the right of every individual, it looks like you can't have a personal opinion that goes against the monarchy to me reading this.............A way bigger insult to those that died for freedom than corbyns refusal to sing an anthem. Its a free country supposedly, people have the right to not agree with anything they like, if not its not a free country and not worth fighting for, and other people have the right to condemn him for it, it goes both ways. He is free not to sing the anthem But he's an arse for doing it.....he must have known what public opinion would be Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html And his excuse for not singing the national anthem at a remembrance service is what exactly? Apart from being a prick. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11867337/Jeremy-Corbyn-disloyal-national-anthem-Labour-leader.html What exactly has the national anthem go to do with rememberance day?The national anthem is sung at official events....just like most countries do This event was for the brave men and women who fought in the battle of Britain to save the united kingdom So they sing the National Anthem And i always though those brave men and women fought to keep GB a free country, a country where free speech was the right of every individual, it looks like you can't have a personal opinion that goes against the monarchy to me reading this.............A way bigger insult to those that died for freedom than corbyns refusal to sing an anthem. Its a free country supposedly, people have the right to not agree with anything they like, if not its not a free country and not worth fighting for, and other people have the right to condemn him for it, it goes both ways. He is free not to sing the anthem But he's an arse for doing it.....he must have known what public opinion would be Yes mate, i think he's working for the tories, they couldn't do more damage to the socialist movement if they were running labour themselves Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,192 Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Corbyn has giving Lord Watson who is a convicted arsonist a front bench position.If that doesn't tell you how little support he genuinely has then nothing does.He did 8 months inside for it and he's inside parliament, what an utter fcukin disgrace. He's paid his debt to society now so what's the issue? Not like he's a nonce. He set fire to some curtains when he was pished, hardly the crime of the century, he didn't even hurt anyone and he did 8 months inside for it. No its not crime of the century but look at others who have been convicted of less and lost a lot more. Would a soldier, nurse, children's care worker or a copper keep their job or get a job as one of the above after doing time for arson? I think not. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.