Accip74 7,112 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 Am I the only one who feels it could've been an inside job?? I knew a man who was what I would call 'a conspiracist' he was always coming out with "it's a conspiracy" and whilst I am sure there is something's in some claims, my natural disposition is not to accept anything I cannot see clearly for myself. So one day a few years ago in work 9/11 comes up. . And up jumps the conspiracist with "the Americans did it" I was instantly dismissive, and maybe was a bit sarcastic with my response. The next day he adamantly offers me a dvd on 9/11 "watch it." That's all he said. I did watch it, my main objection was answered at the start "if it was an inside job, who would fly the planes"?? It turns out that they've been flying jumpo jets in the Nevada desert unmanned since the 80's. OK, so now I'm really watching. . Motive?? My other objection, well the U.S. was and still is in Trillions of dollars of debt, the first thing they did after 9/11 was invade Afghanistan, Why?? For financial gain. Oil, even opium some say. You see architects saying "this is a demolition job!!" others saying the buildings are designed to withstand aerial damage! I could go on. . Frightening thought! And who would trust George Bush. "The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil." I can't get my simple little brain around most of that stuff......but I'm not buying that 3 of the biggest buildings in America all suffered such incredible structural failings they were all built to withstand, leading to them collapsing in seconds perfectly on their own footprint, all on the same day??? Historically, other high rise steel structure buildings have burnt longer (several days infact) & at similar temperatures, but never showed any signs of collapse......I just don't buy it, but what do I know? Haha 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 There was a documentary on discovery recently, they recreated the temperature achieved and the steels actually softened, you then had millions of tonnes above which just collapsed the building. They had two of the countries top demolition companies on and they showed (by collapsing a tower block) how much preparation was needed to cause a building to collapse under explosion. They said it would have taken over three weeks with a team of around 20 guys to install the explosives needed to drop the tower, they would have had to cut through walls to get to the steel structure to fit the explosives. In other words it would have been impossible without it being noticed. They then interviewed the tin foil hat brigade and their opinion was these demolition companies were being bribed by the government to keep quiet..... Sorry no conspiracy just some evil scum with a twisted religion as their motive. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
noddy10 411 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 There only Muslims, should of wiped a few more out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AKA-BRINDLE 879 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 A quick question to the educated...whats in that grand mosque at mecca? (i know its not bingo)...they all swarm round some big black block...whats in there???...got it into my head its a chunck of meteorite?... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 Google 9/11 families for justice, an you see what the families are saying, apparently Obama has completely ignored letters delivered to him recently by congress members, family's of 9/11 wanting the investigations of the day declassified, even tho he promised it years ago. Apparently the used some hi tech explosive, that doesn't need wiring, plausible, what about the new owner of the tower an building 7 insuring them for bizillion dollars just couple months before it happened. What about the video of the BBC reporting it live, that building 7 has collasped, when you can see it in background? Hmmmm Hundreds of unanswered questions, why? Look what happened after it, invasions all round. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 https://youtu.be/ltP2t9nq9fI Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 .....Haribos. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AKA-BRINDLE 879 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 .....Haribos... If thats the case...why they all so f***ing miserable? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 (edited) There was a documentary on discovery recently, they recreated the temperature achieved and the steels actually softened, you then had millions of tonnes above which just collapsed the building. They had two of the countries top demolition companies on and they showed (by collapsing a tower block) how much preparation was needed to cause a building to collapse under explosion. They said it would have taken over three weeks with a team of around 20 guys to install the explosives needed to drop the tower, they would have had to cut through walls to get to the steel structure to fit the explosives. In other words it would have been impossible without it being noticed. They then interviewed the tin foil hat brigade and their opinion was these demolition companies were being bribed by the government to keep quiet..... Sorry no conspiracy just some evil scum with a twisted religion as their motive. If it was just the towers, I may of swallowed it, but wtc7 is the elephant in the room for me........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America, which just collapsed from fire? No impact from planes......the only 3 steel structure buildings in the history of the world to collapse from heat caused by fire?Larry Silverstien (world trade centres leaseholder) & John Kerry are both on film saying wtc7 was 'pulled' due to safety reasons.....like you say that would take weeks to arrange? Or was a massive breach of security too much of an embarrassment for the bush admin? After all George Bush's brother & cousin were head of the security firm which looked after the towers? Too many questions for me & I wouldn't be letting an obsessive hate of a religion cloud my judgement.... Edited September 12, 2015 by Accip74 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stop.end 4,079 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html I was working downtown Manhattan that morning.... we were just taking the coffee order to go to the deli when it happened.... believe me the buildings coming down where planned to perfection! The NYPD & FDNY were running about for a good 2 hours telling everyone to get back the buildings were going to collapse and me being from Northern Ireland and growing up in the troubles I know what bombs sound like and there was a lot that seemed to be going off that day. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CushtyJook 1,097 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html So what about all the other buildings in close proximity to the buildings that collapsed why didn't they come down Quote Link to post Share on other sites
staffs riffraff 1,068 Posted September 12, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 what bout the camera footage at the pentagon? one more they say that the engines disintegrated on impact lol titanium and high quality aero grade steel engines disintegrate lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html This doesn't explain why the BBC reported it collasped, twenty mins before it happened does it, 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted September 12, 2015 Report Share Posted September 12, 2015 Plus that article proved nothing, no evidence nothing, just a biased owned controlled paper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.