Born Hunter 17,841 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 On 08/09/2015 at 07:01, Truther said: It wasn't meant to be insightful, i was stating the obvious, or what they would like to happen. Our laws aren't lawful in other countries are they? Its self condoning, that means very little from a legal stance, it just means we'll defend it on the world stage, and to our bleeding heart traitors, with the blood of ordinary people if needs be. If someone is a threat to us they should be taken out no matter where they're hiding, i'm all for it, but when it edges them closer to their goals i trust nothing they say. Not to mention them cosying up to the backers.........its all BS. I don't necessarily disagree with any of that. But let's not stray too far from where this started. I said I'm glad it didn't go through parliament, you said it did 2 years ago. It didn't. The RAF are not bombing Assad's assets yet and it'd be very foolish to do so as part of any strategic goal without parliamentary approval (not that it's constitutionally required). Nonetheless, I'm not disagreeing that they want to force an end to the civil war and out the man, or that this drone strike was a convenient way of testing the water on the issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,192 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 On 08/09/2015 at 08:10, Blackbriar said: There's talk in Westminster that a group of sanctimonious, bleeding-heart liberals will demand a judicial review, or challenge the legality of fighting back against our enemies....... ........(hangs head in despair !) Never hang your head in despair over those idiots, they proved in the last election that they don't represent many people. All the judicial reviews etc won't change a thing. They're still dead and others like them will die to hopefully a lot of them. When there is a very definate clear and present danger even this government knows it has to take decisive and damning action. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted September 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 On 08/09/2015 at 09:06, Brewman said: On 08/09/2015 at 08:10, Blackbriar said: There's talk in Westminster that a group of sanctimonious, bleeding-heart liberals will demand a judicial review, or challenge the legality of fighting back against our enemies....... ........(hangs head in despair !) Never hang your head in despair over those idiots, they proved in the last election that they don't represent many people. All the judicial reviews etc won't change a thing. They're still dead and others like them will die to hopefully a lot of them. When there is a very definate clear and present danger even this government knows it has to take decisive and damning action. I despaired of politicians many years go, mate . But, when I think of the people who died at Charlie Hebdo, on the beach in Tunisia and countless other cowardly attacks carried out by spineless heathens, it makes me genuinely angry that a small group of self-righteous do-gooders think we have done something wrong by preventing carnage on our own streets ! And if that Corbyn tw4t comes bleating on the news, I swear I'll need more blood pressure medication! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted September 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 (edited) Here we go...... Islamic State conflict: Call for proof over drone strike - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-34183320 Harriet Harman has called for "independent scrutiny" of the strikes....blah,blah....human rights.......blah, blah........legal technicalities.....blah, blah. Shame they didn't demand apply such legal rigour of St. Tony of Blair ! Jeremy Corbyn has said that the process by which the attacks " are sanctioned, on what evidence of law and on what basis" needed to be looked at as a matter of urgency, but he showed where his loyalty lies some time ago....... Labour leadership: Corbyn faces Iraq conference questions - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34179201 Edited September 8, 2015 by Blackbriar Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crowsnest 55 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 good riddance, and as far as i'm concerned there not british Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 Lets face it no Muslim is British Their loyalties lie elsewhere and they will always take the side of their brothers and sisters A Muslim will always get upset if a non muslim country interferes with a muslim country......even though they are not even from that country....their only connection is Islam 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Truther 1,579 Posted September 8, 2015 Report Share Posted September 8, 2015 On 08/09/2015 at 08:13, Born Hunter said: On 08/09/2015 at 07:01, Truther said: It wasn't meant to be insightful, i was stating the obvious, or what they would like to happen. Our laws aren't lawful in other countries are they? Its self condoning, that means very little from a legal stance, it just means we'll defend it on the world stage, and to our bleeding heart traitors, with the blood of ordinary people if needs be. If someone is a threat to us they should be taken out no matter where they're hiding, i'm all for it, but when it edges them closer to their goals i trust nothing they say. Not to mention them cosying up to the backers.........its all BS. I don't necessarily disagree with any of that. But let's not stray too far from where this started. I said I'm glad it didn't go through parliament, you said it did 2 years ago. It didn't. The RAF are not bombing Assad's assets yet and it'd be very foolish to do so as part of any strategic goal without parliamentary approval (not that it's constitutionally required). Nonetheless, I'm not disagreeing that they want to force an end to the civil war and out the man, or that this drone strike was a convenient way of testing the water on the issue. I know that vote 2 years ago was a different kettle of fish to this, and i'm assuming a lot granted, this could be 100 % genuine and they're taking out a serious threat to us? But it looks like a convenient chance to test the water with the public and MP's It just boils down to me not trusting anything they do anymore i suppose? I don't think i'm alone on that one Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.