David Icke

[mushroom 12,961]

As for lifting the block at Baalbek slowly slowly is the answer same as Stonehenge. Lift one end chock it lift the other a little higher

[kanny 20,611]

I think we simply underestimate and don't give credit to the ancient people's abilities.

as I said before

[Silversnake 1,099]

There are temples built that cannot be explained, some are on top of

Mountains where the vegetation has never been cleared for example and the accuracy from an astrological point of view is way beyond our latest and greatest methods. I am not taking anything away from the ancient peoples but why was that information not passed down and advanced further? Either someone is hiding something or (dare I say!) from another planet and more advanced than us.

[Truther 1,579]

As for lifting the block at Baalbek slowly slowly is the answer same as Stonehenge. Lift one end chock it lift the other a little higher

 

I don't think you're grasping how heavy 1200 tons is Mush.........."lift one end" with what?.......what could be strong enough to use as a lever? There's a lot of difference between the lintols at Stone Henge that were lifted like that, and the stones at Baalbeck.......And even if you could get a lever strong enough, how do you get enough manpower on it? I think primitive men did it, but no idea how they did it?

[MickC 1,825]

Coral Castle is an interesting read about lifting heavy stone without machines, it was built by a Latvian immigrant called Edward Leedskalnin who claimed to know the secret of the Pyramids who single handedly moved Coral blocks of stone upto 30 ton in weight.

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

As for lifting the block at Baalbek slowly slowly is the answer same as Stonehenge. Lift one end chock it lift the other a little higher

I don't think you're grasping how heavy 1200 tons is Mush.........."lift one end" with what?.......what could be strong enough to use as a lever? There's a lot of difference between the lintols at Stone Henge that were lifted like that, and the stones at Baalbeck.......And even if you could get a lever strong enough, how do you get enough manpower on it? I think primitive men did it, but no idea how they did it?

Truther the pyramids, an baelbeck stones were all built an moved by giants, plain an simple, plenty of evidence, to back it up,

 

Easily found on google

[lurcherman 887 13,156]

Didnt they find a 36ft skeleton in iraq?

[Francie 6,368]

Yes mate, an they found hundreds of pretty big skeletons all around the world.

[Francie 6,368]

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

 

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

[Truther 1,579]

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

 

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

 

It's interesting stuff mate, no doubt about it. I've read a fair bit about the American mound builders, seems to be plenty of genuine reports in newspapers from the 1800's, hard to fake those i would think? But only 9' so not that much bigger than us if it's true? I don't think it explains Baalbeck, and the pyramids don't have any depictions of "giants" only normal sized people, and the small towns that housed the workers who built the pyramids are built on a scale that fits normal sized people.............You can't use the pyramids to back the bible up..........we know to much about their construction and who did it.......the only mystery now is the astrological and measurement aspect of it.

[MickC 1,825]

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

Would love to have a good rake about and see what the Smithsonian do actually have hidden away,if the rumours are to be believed it would certainly turn our history/creation etc on its head. Read in another book about a 10 foot skeleton that used to be on display in the 1800s in a London train station. Wonder where that went ? Edited August 7, 2015 by MickC

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

 

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

It's interesting stuff mate, no doubt about it. I've read a fair bit about the American mound builders, seems to be plenty of genuine reports in newspapers from the 1800's, hard to fake those i would think? But only 9' so not that much bigger than us if it's true? I don't think it explains Baalbeck, and the pyramids don't have any depictions of "giants" only normal sized people, and the small towns that housed the workers who built the pyramids are built on a scale that fits normal sized people.............You can't use the pyramids to back the bible up..........we know to much about their construction and who did it.......the only mystery now is the astrological and measurement aspect of it.

Note to walshie,,,I did not mention the bible lol

 

 

A lot of large skeletons found mate, fourteen footers, an bigger, seems a logical explanation for the pyramids.

 

What's the methods you talk of mate?

[Francie 6,368]

 

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

Would love to have a good rake about and see what the Smithsonian do actually have hidden away,if the rumours are to be believed it would certainly turn our history/creation etc on its head. Read in another book about a 10 foot skeleton that used to be on display in the 1800s in a London train station. Wonder where that went ?

Same here mate, very interesting, il be keeping an eye on these publications, I've a funny feeling that the truth will not be told.

 

That's some size of femur bone, eh.

[staffs riffraff 1,068]

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/

 

Here you go lads, Smithsonian in court last year, trying to cover up large skeletons found lol

that's got to be a fake news site lol

[Truther 1,579]

Sorry Walshie...........i did mention it, relevant to the counter argument of Francie's explanation of the pyramids though

 

 

Even if they could pull 4 hundredweight, that's still 6,000 people, we haven't found any steel rope, so i'm guessing they used hemp/jute rope, you couldn't get enough rope on the block to get 6,000 people on it, and it would have to be 3' thick or it would snap, the rope would weight tons on it's own, so add more bodies to take that into account, so add more rope for extra bodies...........it don't add up mate?

 

I'm not stabbing in the dark here as such Francie, i've been in construction all my life, i've mainly done the big civil stuff, and commercial, sometimes we've had to use the heavy stuff and no room for a crane or forktruck, there's a limit to how many bodies you can get round something depending on it's shape, as soon as something gets to 1 ton, and it's short it's not easy, even with decent lifting gear and bodies/levers..........1200 tons looks impossible with primitive gear once you've had a go with just 1 ton.