Hawkings Search For E.t

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

Here you francie or anyone some intresting stuff in this episode dealing with why and how we are here http://youtu.be/VopqQoJPMtw

Mate that's just showbiz, no science explained, just propaganda, thanks anyway

yes your right it is just a showbiz type but there is nothing wrong with trying to connect with the masses and get them thinking about it...propaganda? I don't think so as it only highlights theory's out there it doesn't define them as fact.

I though the first quarter was very interesting trying to replicate life in the laboratory.

 

I like the theory that we are a result of the universe getting to know and understand it's self it's this that drives ever increasing intelligence with the ultimate goal being answers to the how and why questions.

 

I will have a look at you video later francie when I have a quiet hour sounds like im going to need All my concentration lol

Yeah you will mate proper science, lol

 

It's more or less coming from the side that evo happened, when infact it hasn't, putting a celeb in there to gloss over the facts, first of all they put the bacteria there, that skips the most important part, where an how did it appear, but it doesn't mention that, an the bacteria is still bacteria nothing happe ned, they don't go into detail at all mate.

[kanny 20,418]

I think it's how people define what is a creator that's the problem ... I just don't buy the biblical version of the all seeing judgmental god the created in his own image thy shall obey me or else bollocks! ...a scientist doesn't judge individually life in a petri dish I'd like to think that a creator would be scientific..For what other reason would you creat something?

 

I also have a problem with the big bang coming from a singularly...singularity= not a fooking clue

[Francie 6,368]

Haha my opinion is people don't like the fact God created this place, its his, an so he's the boss, an there's a few easy simple rules, mostly to keep us safe, to follow, an people don't want to obey they want to do run after their own lusts, an do what they like, forget the rules in doing whatever I want thing.

 

So over the years people were looking excuses to get rid of God, along came evo, you might get rid of him in the meantime, but in the end, there's nowhere to hide., plus he doesn't command you to obey, you have the free will choice it's up to you

 

Back to the science, imo, science is a good thing, helps us a lot, but it can't explain the big questions, .

[kanny 20,418]

"Haha my opinion is people don't like the fact God created this place," ...there's the problem your claiming that it's fact ..you can have faith in god but as yet you can't call it fact.

[Francie 6,368]

OK not fact but logical lol

[kanny 20,418]

OK not fact but logical lol

logical to you perhaps ...anyway aren't you supposed to be in church now?

[Francie 6,368]

my church is my home mate

[Lenmcharristar 9,721]

 

OK not fact but logical lol

logical to you perhaps ...anyway aren't you supposed to be in church now?

 

he doesn't do church, he said church is for wimps

[WILF 46,552]

I think it's how people define what is a creator that's the problem ... I just don't buy the biblical version of the all seeing judgmental god the created in his own image thy shall obey me or else bollocks! ...a scientist doesn't judge individually life in a petri dish I'd like to think that a creator would be scientific..For what other reason would you creat something?

I also have a problem with the big bang coming from a singularly...singularity= not a fooking clue

Fair enough opinion mate, let me ask a question.......when you think about animals do you see intelligent design ?

[kanny 20,418]

 

 

I think it's how people define what is a creator that's the problem ... I just don't buy the biblical version of the all seeing judgmental god the created in his own image thy shall obey me or else bollocks! ...a scientist doesn't judge individually life in a petri dish I'd like to think that a creator would be scientific..For what other reason would you creat something?

I also have a problem with the big bang coming from a singularly...singularity= not a fooking clue

Fair enough opinion mate, let me ask a question.......when you think about animals do you see intelligent design ?

I see a design that's been perfected over millions of years the evolution of the eye is a perfect example ...there's a saying give enough monkeys typewriters and enough time and they will write the works of Shakespeare... .remarkable but not intelligent.

[Francie 6,368]

An also a lie kanny, lol

[morton 5,368]

Could be intresting i wonder how it would change us if they do find somthing ...the holy books would be out for a start or would they reassess the scriptures and say daaaa would you believe it it was there all along http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/210393-stephen-hawking-and-yuri-milner-unveil-100-million-initiative-to-dramatically-accelerate-search-for-alien-life

Hawkins cannot even assemble his seat and he wants to find Aliens,as he,s supposed to be the cleverest man on the planet why as he not learnt to walk?.

[kanny 20,418]

An also a lie kanny, lol

I thought it might be

[Tiercel 6,986]

Well feck me I just looked at the title of this thread. Guess what it said?

Hawkings Search For E.t

 

Not francie looking for approval for his beliefs. Yet anther hijacked thread by him.

 

TC

[Francie 6,368]

There is so many things wrong with that vid kanny, I don't know were to start. Lol

 

Is there any scientific evidence, to prove the step by step process, that the video assumes?

 

500000000, million years the eye started to evolve, lol another assumption, with no scientific evidence

 

So we came from the water they say, at what point did the retina move to the front of the human eye, when we came from the water?

This is very important question, because ultraviolet rays coming from the sun would have burned the eyes an rendered them blind, without the protection of the retina in front.

 

This would have to be an instant change, or else the supposed animal coming from the water would be blind, so were does that leave time to evolve?

 

Creatures in the water, like the octopus it showed, there retina are at the back of the eye, because the water blocks the ultra violet rays, thus protecting the creatures eye.

 

So you've guessed it, human retinas are at the front, to protect our eyes, because we live in the air, which doesn't protect the eye from the sunlight, unlike the water.

 

So the transition, from back to front, needs to be explained, because its not logical.