courser 73 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) As Chairman of the Association of Lurcher Clubs I have just finished a Conference call meeting with the Council of Hunting Associations(CHA) The subject was the Debate on Thursday next week off an amendment to the Hunting Ban. What will this mean? The amendment, as I understand it, will mean that hunts can use more than two hounds to flush a mammal (Fox or Hare) to waiting guns, which means that hunting with hounds will be able to carry on using a full pack. Until now a full pack could only be used for trail hunting. So it will then be legal for a full pack in pursuit of a fox/Hare. An acceptable amendment until a full repeal. How will this affect the Lurcher man? It means that you will be able to use Lurchers/Longdogs to course (Drive) an Hare to someone waiting with a legally held gun. As long as you have permission of the landowner, you will be able to carry on pretty much as before the ban. What we must do! Lobby your MP, be he /she Conservative or Labour and tell him you want him/her to vote for the amendment There is a E-lobby faculty on the grassroots web site, or you can send him/her a letter or card (Cards will be available) This must be done ASAP. I remember before the ban asking for lurcher owners to lobby their MPs and was amazed by the the rush of indifference and look what happened. This is our chance to stand up and be counted. On wednesday of next week there will be a lobby of MPs in Westminster and it is hoped that two people from each constituency will speak to their MPs asking them to support the amendment. If you are able to attend please contact me. This will not be the end of the matter, we will carry on until there is a full repeal. Alan Tyer. Edited July 9, 2015 by courser 9 Quote Link to post
desertbred 5,490 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) You could use any 2 dogs to drive to a gun or a bird of prey before any amendment as long as the gun was licensed and you were on permission , so what is in the amendment for lurcher long dog and terrier owners/workers ? Edited July 9, 2015 by desertbred 3 Quote Link to post
brookie 1,193 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 On 09/07/2015 at 11:06, courser said: As Chairman of the Association of Lurcher Clubs I have just finished a Conference call meeting with the Council of Hunting Associations(CHA) The subject was the Debate on Thursday next week off an amendment to the Hunting Ban. What will this mean? The amendment, as I understand it, will mean that hunts can use more than two hounds to flush a mammal (Fox or Hare) to waiting guns, which means that hunting with hounds will be able to carry on using a full pack. Until now a full pack could only be used for trail hunting. So it will then be legal for a full pack in pursuit of a fox/Hare. An acceptable amendment until a full repeal. How will this affect the Lurcher man? It means that you will be able to use Lurchers/Longdogs to course (Drive) an Hare to someone waiting with a legally held gun. As long as you have permission of the landowner, you will be able to carry on pretty much as before the ban. What we must do! Lobby your MP, be he /she Conservative or Labour and tell him you want him/her to vote for the amendment There is a E-lobby faculty on the grassroots web site, or you can send him/her a letter or card (Cards will be available) This must be done ASAP. I remember before the ban asking for lurcher owners to lobby their MPs and was amazed by the the rush of indifference and look what happened. This is our chance to stand up and be counted. On wednesday of next week there will be a lobby of MPs in Westminster and it is hoped that two people from each constituency will speak to their MPs asking them to support the amendment. If you are able to attend please contact me. This will not be the end of the matter, we will carry on until there is a full repeal. Alan Tyer. its as i expected though alan ,its only going to suit the tallyho gang its not going to make any difference to us lurcher boys is it . 3 Quote Link to post
davey 310 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 So it will have to go to club coursing and more money to fork out for memberships pay the land owner but at least we could have regulated sport and stoo the rot and stop looking over your shoulder 1 Quote Link to post
desertbred 5,490 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) It can only go to club coursing if the ban was repealed completely. These organised coursing clubs previously only recognised doubled up coursing and not single handed coursing any way. The private clubs did single handed but once the ban was introduced it became illegal on or off permission. To much smoke and mirrors involved in these organisations Camerons Repeal now amendment and something is better than nothing simple question better for who ? Edited July 9, 2015 by desertbred 1 Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 Alot of pish 3 Quote Link to post
paulsmithy83 567 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 This repeal was always about fox hunting and wanna be power rich men. Nothing for us guys. Houbds men want us to help vote to get hunts back but are they standing up for us ???? 3 Quote Link to post
desertbred 5,490 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 Come on lets see some input ,opinions from the running dog lads on the forum Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 My opinion is it will never happen Quote Link to post
desertbred 5,490 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 What will never happen ? Quote Link to post
lucky 578 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 All politicians are full of shit corrupt c**ts take what ever they say with a pinch of salt and carry on as normal, none of them get my vote and never have because no matter who gets in power you can guarentee they will do there absolute best to f**k the country over. 2 Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) On 09/07/2015 at 18:24, desertbred said: What will never happen ?the ban will never be lifted and it will never go back to the way it was Edited July 9, 2015 by nothernlite Quote Link to post
desertbred 5,490 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 On 09/07/2015 at 18:51, nothernlite said: On 09/07/2015 at 18:24, desertbred said: What will never happen ?the ban will never be lifted and it will never go back to the way it was I am in agreement with you but isnt it better to attempt something and fail than just let the powers that be f**k you over ? 3 Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 Mate there been f***ing us over for years like yesterday budget lol matter what we do it just make the arrogant b.....ds more determined 1 Quote Link to post
mad4it 695 Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 it a start but as said at the moment it only seems that the fox hounds can use a full pack where us lurcher lads/lasses are still going to be looking over our shoulders. As what was said on other threads about the ban we need to march on parliment next thursday would be the ideal time and day to do it as it would show them that us lads/lasses want a repeal not admendments. 2 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.