desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 I am comfortable to live in Iran as are my family my 3 elder children and my grand children all live there I am here for a specific reason and fixed period of time. You western folk have a problem with islam we don't. And there lies the rub. We wouldn't have a problem with Islam just like we don't have a problem with Hindus, Buddhism, Taoism etc if it wasn't for the fact that Islam is a destructive faith which will not accept anyone of any other religion. Some of these followers are 500 years behind civilisation. Don't tell me about its only "a few bad apples we're not all like that" the fact is YOUR religion is the biggest threat to peace and humanity there is. The reason I have a problem wiith Iran is if they do ever get a Nuclear program that develops a weapon you can guarantee there will be some f*ckwit come along who just can't wait to push the button so he can trot off the paradise with his 21 virgins. You are the f**k wit, the only country to use a nuke is America who you and your like kiss their arse, so go talk about something that you may have knowledge about. I doubt if you could find anything you can talk about with authority Oops touched a nerve there I see, maybe a little too close to the truth for comfort. I think you will find there have been hundreds of nukes used mainly thoughtout the 60's and 70's in particular Russia, USA, France and the UK, these are well documented however I assume your jibe is reference to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Whilst I don't condone their use and the lives lost it was in my opinion a necessary evil. Had the USA not used this weapon Japan's Emporer had committed to fighting to the last and asking every man woman and child to fight and defend the empire. This would have resulted in millions more lives. Admittedly no consolation to the 200 or so thousand who lost their lives on those islands but still far less than would have if the war had continued a year or two. Now the only necessary evil some crack pot Islamic nutter with a finger on the button will think about is his own self You really are an idiot of the highest calibre the only nukes to be used in history for military purposes are by the yanks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki the only other live tests have been carried out as tests by the documented nuclear powers and possibly one undocumented one. Y I didn't say for military purposes did I, instead of trying to score points with cheap insults perhaps you should think a little more before pressing those keys. I was wrong however it wasn't hundreds (I admit I had to google this) there have been 2,056 atomic weapons tested (used) since the 1950's. The first ever Nuclear explosion was in New Mexico. tested being the operative word so check your keys before you press I dont need to google this stuff Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 Culture and values are all over the world , true culture and values are what societies are built on. views and personal feelings are often clouded by many colourants , EDL, BNP are they cultural values .? no they are not just as Al Quaida and ISIS ,and the Taliban are not cultural values to me. Many bigoted opinions are based on what ?certainly not cultural values. The opinions are based on corrosion of the British way of life in many towns and cities nothing to do with white or religion then? Religion (Muslims) is a far bigger problem than skin colour Coloured people have been coming here for years and adapted to our way of life and become British Muslims have not...They are happy to keep their cultures alive and resist any westernization in their homelands but shout racist bigot at those in western countries who who wish to do the same The first Muslim to come to the UK wasin the 12th century and coloured is a racist term you have used is it not Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 iran has a serious smack problem thought that was against their religion Every country race and religion have smack problems isnt it against their religions culture and morals also ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lurcherman 887 13,140 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 Coloured 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 Culture and values are all over the world , true culture and values are what societies are built on. views and personal feelings are often clouded by many colourants , EDL, BNP are they cultural values .? no they are not just as Al Quaida and ISIS ,and the Taliban are not cultural values to me. Many bigoted opinions are based on what ?certainly not cultural values. The opinions are based on corrosion of the British way of life in many towns and cities nothing to do with white or religion then?Religion (Muslims) is a far bigger problem than skin colour Coloured people have been coming here for years and adapted to our way of life and become British Muslims have not...They are happy to keep their cultures alive and resist any westernization in their homelands but shout racist bigot at those in western countries who who wish to do the same The first Muslim to come to the UK wasin the 12th century and coloured is a racist term you have used is it not The muslim explosion in the UK is a more recent thing 20 years ago the word Muslim was hardly mentioned 20 years ago I had never seen the Burka walking down the street Coloured is probably a racist term these days won't be long before the slogan Buy British is a racist saying Funny how its racist to say coloured but its ok to have an organization called NAACP Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 I am comfortable to live in Iran as are my family my 3 elder children and my grand children all live there I am here for a specific reason and fixed period of time. You western folk have a problem with islam we don't. And there lies the rub. We wouldn't have a problem with Islam just like we don't have a problem with Hindus, Buddhism, Taoism etc if it wasn't for the fact that Islam is a destructive faith which will not accept anyone of any other religion. Some of these followers are 500 years behind civilisation. Don't tell me about its only "a few bad apples we're not all like that" the fact is YOUR religion is the biggest threat to peace and humanity there is. The reason I have a problem wiith Iran is if they do ever get a Nuclear program that develops a weapon you can guarantee there will be some f*ckwit come along who just can't wait to push the button so he can trot off the paradise with his 21 virgins. You are the f**k wit, the only country to use a nuke is America who you and your like kiss their arse, so go talk about something that you may have knowledge about. I doubt if you could find anything you can talk about with authority Oops touched a nerve there I see, maybe a little too close to the truth for comfort. I think you will find there have been hundreds of nukes used mainly thoughtout the 60's and 70's in particular Russia, USA, France and the UK, these are well documented however I assume your jibe is reference to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Whilst I don't condone their use and the lives lost it was in my opinion a necessary evil. Had the USA not used this weapon Japan's Emporer had committed to fighting to the last and asking every man woman and child to fight and defend the empire. This would have resulted in millions more lives. Admittedly no consolation to the 200 or so thousand who lost their lives on those islands but still far less than would have if the war had continued a year or two. Now the only necessary evil some crack pot Islamic nutter with a finger on the button will think about is his own self You really are an idiot of the highest calibre the only nukes to be used in history for military purposes are by the yanks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki the only other live tests have been carried out as tests by the documented nuclear powers and possibly one undocumented one. Y I didn't say for military purposes did I, instead of trying to score points with cheap insults perhaps you should think a little more before pressing those keys. I was wrong however it wasn't hundreds (I admit I had to google this) there have been 2,056 atomic weapons tested (used) since the 1950's. The first ever Nuclear explosion was in New Mexico. tested being the operative word so check your keys before you press I dont need to google this stuff My, my, aren't we a little bit touchy today. re read again. The adjective I chose was "used". If you throw a hand grenade into an empty field to test it are you not "using" it? Or can it be used again because its only a test. At no point did I refer to them being used against an enemy in a military way. By the way if you knew there were 2,056 nukes detonated since 1945 then hats off to you me old china. I didn't and admitted that I thought it was in the hundreds. What I do know is if those Islamic fundamentalists in Iran got there little fingers on one theres a good chance that figure will rise to 2,057 before the USA turns it into a car park. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nothernlite 18,083 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 coloured racist ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 (edited) NAACP thats Americans for you, by the way they spell it colored maybe that makes it legal. Think you will find the biggest influx of Muslims was around the late 50,s early 60,s. Didnt Catholic ladies wear veils to go to church years ago ? Edited June 18, 2015 by desertbred Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 I am comfortable to live in Iran as are my family my 3 elder children and my grand children all live there I am here for a specific reason and fixed period of time. You western folk have a problem with islam we don't. And there lies the rub. We wouldn't have a problem with Islam just like we don't have a problem with Hindus, Buddhism, Taoism etc if it wasn't for the fact that Islam is a destructive faith which will not accept anyone of any other religion. Some of these followers are 500 years behind civilisation. Don't tell me about its only "a few bad apples we're not all like that" the fact is YOUR religion is the biggest threat to peace and humanity there is. The reason I have a problem wiith Iran is if they do ever get a Nuclear program that develops a weapon you can guarantee there will be some f*ckwit come along who just can't wait to push the button so he can trot off the paradise with his 21 virgins. You are the f**k wit, the only country to use a nuke is America who you and your like kiss their arse, so go talk about something that you may have knowledge about. I doubt if you could find anything you can talk about with authority Oops touched a nerve there I see, maybe a little too close to the truth for comfort. I think you will find there have been hundreds of nukes used mainly thoughtout the 60's and 70's in particular Russia, USA, France and the UK, these are well documented however I assume your jibe is reference to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Whilst I don't condone their use and the lives lost it was in my opinion a necessary evil. Had the USA not used this weapon Japan's Emporer had committed to fighting to the last and asking every man woman and child to fight and defend the empire. This would have resulted in millions more lives. Admittedly no consolation to the 200 or so thousand who lost their lives on those islands but still far less than would have if the war had continued a year or two. Now the only necessary evil some crack pot Islamic nutter with a finger on the button will think about is his own self You really are an idiot of the highest calibre the only nukes to be used in history for military purposes are by the yanks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki the only other live tests have been carried out as tests by the documented nuclear powers and possibly one undocumented one. Y I didn't say for military purposes did I, instead of trying to score points with cheap insults perhaps you should think a little more before pressing those keys. I was wrong however it wasn't hundreds (I admit I had to google this) there have been 2,056 atomic weapons tested (used) since the 1950's. The first ever Nuclear explosion was in New Mexico. tested being the operative word so check your keys before you press I dont need to google this stuff My, my, aren't we a little bit touchy today. re read again. The adjective I chose was "used". If you throw a hand grenade into an empty field to test it are you not "using" it? Or can it be used again because its only a test. At no point did I refer to them being used against an enemy in a military way. By the way if you knew there were 2,056 nukes detonated since 1945 then hats off to you me old china. I didn't and admitted that I thought it was in the hundreds. What I do know is if those Islamic fundamentalists in Iran got there little fingers on one theres a good chance that figure will rise to 2,057 before the USA turns it into a car park .can you say for certain we have not got one? The USA will do sweet FA Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 The US wouldn't act aggressively towards Iran if more extremist factions gained control of Iran and used a nuclear weapon offensively? I find that very hard to believe. Besides, they would have to beat the Saudis and Israelis to the job. The whole situation is a f***ing bomb in itself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 The US wouldn't act aggressively towards Iran if more extremist factions gained control of Iran and used a nuclear weapon offensively? I find that very hard to believe. Besides, they would have to beat the Saudis and Israelis to the job. The whole situation is a f***ing bomb in itself. Sauds asked the Pakistan army to fight the Houtis in Yemen on their behalf so you can discount them. The Isrealis may dream of it but that isthe extent they cant Deal with Hezbollah in Lebanon never mind Iran. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,118 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 (edited) I think all this would be f****n hilarious if it wasnt so close to home its almost like a Morecambe & Wise sketch.....a foreigner who comes to England to supposedly educate his daughter,living and working in England because he doesnt want to live in his own country.....when asked if he likes anything about England says " i dont have a problem with it " .........well thats absolutely wonderful its such a relief that you tolerate the country you live off and dont have too much of a problem with us ......unbelievable ! Edited June 18, 2015 by gnasher16 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 NAACP thats Americans for you, by the way they spell it colored maybe that makes it legal. Think you will find the biggest influx of Muslims was around the late 50,s early 60,s. Didnt Catholic ladies wear veils to go to church years ago ? Biggest increase was in last 20 years numbers doubled 2001 to 2011 No idea about veils not a Catholic and never went to church Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 (edited) The US wouldn't act aggressively towards Iran if more extremist factions gained control of Iran and used a nuclear weapon offensively? I find that very hard to believe. Besides, they would have to beat the Saudis and Israelis to the job. The whole situation is a f***ing bomb in itself. Sauds asked the Pakistan army to fight the Houtis in Yemen on their behalf so you can discount them. The Isrealis may dream of it but that isthe extent they cant Deal with Hezbollah in Lebanon never mind Iran. The Saudis have access to nuclear weapons right now and are becoming progressively far more willing to get involved regionally. An Iranian nuclear strike would seriously provoke them. The Israelis also have nuclear weapons, just don't talk about it, and they have the capability to strike, and they're fairly hardline on this topic. The mind-set of every enemy of a nuclear capable Iran that has already used such weapons in anger will be to pre-emptively attack before they become Iran's next target. Iran can have nuclear weapons, probably, but the moment they use them they have made themselves into a very big target. As with Pakistan, the worry is that some extremist faction gains control and causes a regional nuclear war. Edited June 18, 2015 by Born Hunter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted June 18, 2015 Report Share Posted June 18, 2015 (edited) No nuclear war will be regional thats a total misconception the next time a nuclear weapon or atomic bomb is used that will be world war 3 on the table..The Sauds are only interested in perpetuating and protecting their saud monarchy they finance groups like ISIS , Taliban Boka Haram to promote wahabism using tactics they have learned from CIA Mossad etc rather than direct confrontation.What they havent learned is that once these groups go feral they will destroy their paymasters also.Iran is not as isolated as people think we have strong links with China and Russia so the axis of USA isreal and Sauds are not in as much control as they assume. Edited June 18, 2015 by desertbred Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.