Guest Ditch_Shitter Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Whole place is just becoming more and more Pythonesque. The authorities and their whisperers watching this place must be crippled with laughter by now. I mean; How many sets of 'Rules' are there now? And who applies Any of them, to All members? What a farce! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RAPID 7 1 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 THE ONLY THING ITS ILLEGAL TO POST A PIC OF IN G.B IS A DOG ON A BADGER EVERYTHING ELSE IS LEGIT IF YOU CAN EXPLAIN HOW THE ANIMAL CAME TO BE KILLED IF IT WAS A SHOT FOX HARE OR DEER THE DOG IS ALLOWED TO LEGALLY TRACK AND RETREVE THE WOUNDED ANIMAL. LET THE ANTIS SAY AND DO WHAT THEY WANT THEY CANT PROVE THE ANIMAL HASNT BEEN SHOT JUST FROM LOOKING AT A PHOTO 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dawn B 212 Posted November 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Whole place is just becoming more and more Pythonesque. The authorities and their whisperers watching this place must be crippled with laughter by now. I mean; How many sets of 'Rules' are there now? And who applies Any of them, to All members? What a farce! Its not a rule, its a simple warning, make of it what you will. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Crow 1 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 (edited) Dawn, I understand your reasons for posting the information above, but until the idiots stop posting 'pre ban' shots and then following it up with a post stating that the dog in the image was born last January making it 11 months old you're wasting your time. A bit of common sense on behalf of the poster could save them from more grief than all the technical know-how in the land of IT! Well done for trying tho, you shouldn't be slated for trying to help Edited November 12, 2007 by Crow Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dawn B 212 Posted November 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Thanks Crow and I totally agree with you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Big Fish Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 FFS people, all that Dawn has done is too inform you that information stored in digital photographs, can be used against you. IT NOT A RULE OR LAW F*ck me, the slightest mention of something that might effect you on here and you all act like fecking children that have had thier sweets taken away from them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ditch_Shitter Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Calm down, 'Maggie'. Where did I say ye were attempting to implement any sort of rule yeself? As it happens, Crow found more time and the mood to state Exactly what I Was driving at. But none of us will stop the idiots. No one else seems to want to. So ..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brummy 9 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Good advice Dawn Stubby.................. Get a grip !! :doh: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest baldie Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Dawn...the phrase "pearls before swine" comes to mind, mi duck. I gave up trying to help folk that dont want it, a loooong time ago.They dont look so clever, stood in the backyard at 5 in the morning, in their jimjam,s when the b*****d squad have kicked in their door, raided their house, and impounded their dogs. Your a good soul for thinking of others. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IanB 0 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Thanks Dawn, at least the problem has been raised, people can make of it as they will.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jef66 0 Posted September 23, 2008 Report Share Posted September 23, 2008 I'll be sure to strip the EXIF from any pics I post that aren't legal of course i'm such a good boy that i'm sure that'll never happen :) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ghillies 209 Posted October 30, 2008 Report Share Posted October 30, 2008 instead of stripping exif can i just strip please? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Red Raven 0 Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Speaking as a professional photographer, the information you try to remove by stripping the EXIF can still be retrieved with the right software. In short, if you don't want to get in trouble - don't post it on the web. Must be a lot of illegal activity going on here? I only hunt tigers and elephants myself, with a catapult. Haven't found one in the South of England yet but when I do I'll stick a photo up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martin 332 Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 It's $50.00 to buy isn't it?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Red Raven 0 Posted November 7, 2009 Report Share Posted November 7, 2009 You can't buy it as it is not available to the general public, it's a bit like trying to buy a nuclear weapon Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.