Just A Thought

[leethedog 3,071]

With all this debate about pictures that get put up and bad practice in the dog world I got to thinking you need a police check and license for a gun and you have spot checks and so on so instead of this ban we all well most of us try to work with would it not have been better if you also needed a hunting dog licence and also had rigorous checks same as gun laws it might of weeded out the shit bags what do you think

[Daniel cain 45,148]

Got no problem in letting anyone see how I conduct myself and dogs while on a dig.I personally believe there should be a limit to the number of dogs that folk should kennel and litters that are churned out.Folks making 40 grand plus peddling litter after litter not right in my eyes,kennel club couldn't give a rats arse as long as they coining it in.Lots of folk on here selling pups for silly silly money to our friends in Europe,shouting pups should be gifted,wrong uns for sure

[marshman 7,757]

No no mate bad idea for all manner of reasons !

[leethedog 3,071]

No no mate bad idea for all manner of reasons !

why government in many countries grant licences to hunt allsorts and it seems to work hunting thrives

[marshman 7,757]

 

No no mate bad idea for all manner of reasons !

why government in many countries grant licences to hunt allsorts and it seems to work hunting thrives

so essentially your saying the government and any relevant authorities such as the I don't know the RSPCA should have a list of anybody that owns or works digging breeds of dogs ? And grant them to who they see fit ?

[Daniel cain 45,148]

Only for those who have something to hide surely? Plenty wrong uns with a rifle out there I know.

[leethedog 3,071]

No ya nutter what I'm saying is you should have a permit to hunt granted by goverment for a permitted animal in a permitted season like the USA and other places it works for them why not here the ban don't work IMHO it's worth a try atleast people would not be scared of taking dogs to vets for treatment when needed would cut out lots of shit

[Daniel cain 45,148]

Rspca are a charity no more no less,wasting old folks money on Court cases they don't win.Now and then they might catch a wrong Un but concentrate more on folks who follow the Law and hunt with in the guidelines.Dont let every f****r know your business and you won't ever have the displeasure of them coming and talking shit to you,simples really.

[mad rabbit 12]

I dont have anything to hide and conduct my self to the highest standards but not a good idea sorry just my opinion

[marshman 7,757]

No ya nutter what I'm saying is you should have a permit to hunt granted by goverment for a permitted animal in a permitted season like the USA and other places it works for them why not here the ban don't work IMHO it's worth a try atleast people would not be scared of taking dogs to vets for treatment when needed would cut out lots of shit

fair play mate but imho it'll never work ! We are just talking digging dogs here are we ? Edited May 14, 2015 by marshman

[leethedog 3,071]

No all types

[General lee 979]

To many regulations as it is everything being pigeon holed I don't think they should start documenting working dogs and deciding who can have them

[wirral countryman 2,110]

With all this debate about pictures that get put up and bad practice in the dog world I got to thinking you need a police check and license for a gun and you have spot checks and so on so instead of this ban we all well most of us try to work with would it not have been better if you also needed a hunting dog licence and also had rigorous checks same as gun laws it might of weeded out the shit bags what do you think

It could never work Lee,what would happen if you are licenced and get in bother ??? they would remove not only your gun but dogs as well, the police are a law unto themselves and cannot be trusted to be either fair or honest, let me tell you and other lads that have either class 1 firearms or class 2 shotgun licences something you may not know, along with every application you have made over the years and permissions,etc that are filed in your name and licence number there is also an intelligence file, this file can be added to by anyone that makes either a grievance or complaint to the police about you, now these are placed in your file without your knowledge or ever giving you a chance to defend yourself from, I have seen mine and its nearly 4" thick,every court case and hearsay complaint going back to every farmer,gamekeeper and idiot I ever met,even stuff you have been only suspected of or questioned on, they also list any known associates that do have a criminal record and when your licence is up for renewal they will put pressure on you to distance yourself or hand it in,I speak from personal experience and not hearsay, WM

[Squirrel_Basher 17,100]

Class 1 and 2 ,never heard of that and i own both .The fact a man takes the time and energy to apply and is granted a firearm usually keeps him on the straight and narrow .Anybody achieving a log of bad comments isnt fit to own a water pistol anyway therefore is denied on renewal .Firearms laws are there for a reason .

[Mosby 355]

All the hunting laws and dog licenses here in the states don't solve any of the problems you are looking to solve. If you saw the poor state of our elk beards and deer in the woods you'd scratch your head as to why we have management at all.