Jump to content

Dmitry Belyeav Fox Experiment


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

QB is not stupid, far from it. However, even though he can see the truth, his faith will not allow him to accept it.   TC

No it's not. It's an example of domestication and evolution through selective breeding. It does nothing to prove evolutionary time lines or family trees or have anything at all to do with a mythical a

Why has this turned into another God thread ... f***ing BORING .............

A really interesting topic that will no doubt turn into page upon page of QuaterBull's preaching :no:

 

I actually knew someone that had one of these silver foxes as a pet. The domestication process didn't do much to help with the stink :bad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from that vid to two dog evolution vids, genetically very different, multiple separate domestications, a lot of proof against dogs coming from one source, at one time.

 

Me an you truther are genetically different but were still human, same with dogs, genetically different, but dogs all the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark, big variety within the DOG kind ( micro evoloution) as he calls it, in a short space of time, good experiment! :-)

Nothing to do with Noah's Ark mate, due to that being just a 'make believe' story.

Whereas micro evolution explains it and micro evolution as science has proved is just evolution on a shorter time frame.

Let's not get fairy stories mixed up with science please.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Micro evoloution, ie variety of kind backs the creation model, dogs bringing forth after their kind, with lots of variety, but still a dog,,, thats science shepp, on the other hand lets not get molecules to man, darwinism, fairytale, mixed up with proper science.

 

Q,, if you bred dogs for a million years, do you think they would change from dogs, to something different, even tho weve seen no change in 4000 odd years?

Edited by Quarter bull
Link to post
Share on other sites

'micro evolution' is evolution.

 

dogs have changed in 40,000 years,do you think there were yorkshire terriers back then?

 

and wait another 40,000 they'll have adapted even more,give it a few million years and they probably wont even be dogs anymore.

 

does that really not make sense to you?

 

no-ones suggesting a chimp gave birth to a human.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I went from that vid to two dog evolution vids, genetically very different, multiple separate domestications, a lot of proof against dogs coming from one source, at one time.

 

Me an you truther are genetically different but were still human, same with dogs, genetically different, but dogs all the same.

 

 

You haven't watched the vid i posted then QB? Have a look at the chart at 16:40 ish. Primates split about 87 million years ago from the same branch as dogs,bears, cats, genetics don't lie mate, unlike books written by men ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah your right truther, genetics dont lie,,, here a genetic question for you,,, if two different " species" can manage to mate,,,,like tiger an lion,,,,or donkey an mule,,,,,,,the offspring are sterile,,,even tho their genetics an chromosones are very similar, so howd does evoloution get pass this infertile barrier,,,,look at God thread mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

If genetics get separated for millions of years and mutate in the meantime the original stock could be way different, i doubt much would have survived without the ability of genes to mutate and adapt. Its one experiment we can't do, unless its done by thousands of generations of us, but when you think the Earth's only 6,000 years old non of that makes any sense does it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ah your assuming again mate, lol you never answered proven scientific fact that there offspring are sterile, how does evoloution get round that, plus mutation is a loss of information, an that. Cant be passed on, it cant even happen unless you get passed the first question, which i doubt you can lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it doesnt make sense to me me i can see alot of variety, but i cant see a dog changing from a dog to say a cat, or in between, thats just fairytale to me,

 

What are you suggesting then ......

That doesn't make sense but what you believe does lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ah your assuming again mate, lol you never answered proven scientific fact that there offspring are sterile, how does evoloution get round that, plus mutation is a loss of information, an that. Cant be passed on, it cant even happen unless you get passed the first question, which i doubt you can lol

 

Actually a lot of hybrids are born fertile. There's multi-generation lion/tiger hybrids and in the reptile world all hybrids are fertile, you get some insane 5-way hybrid snakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...