Jump to content

Dmitry Belyeav Fox Experiment


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

QB is not stupid, far from it. However, even though he can see the truth, his faith will not allow him to accept it.   TC

No it's not. It's an example of domestication and evolution through selective breeding. It does nothing to prove evolutionary time lines or family trees or have anything at all to do with a mythical a

Why has this turned into another God thread ... f***ing BORING .............

Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark, big variety within the DOG kind ( micro evoloution) as he calls it, in a short space of time, good experiment! :-)

 

No it's not. It's an example of domestication and evolution through selective breeding. It does nothing to prove evolutionary time lines or family trees or have anything at all to do with a mythical ark.

 

The entire point in the experiment was to explain why certain behavioural traits show up in domesticated animals which could not be understood with simple evolutionary theory. The experiment helped to define the finer details of evolution theory, not creation.

Edited by Born Hunter
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

You say evoloution i say variety, thats a million miles from darwinisam, molecules to man,,,an i didnt mention creation,,, i merely stated that you can have alot of variety within the dog kind, if as you say selective breeding, were do you see evoloution in there mate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say evoloution i say variety, thats a million miles from darwinisam, molecules to man,,,an i didnt mention creation,,, i merely stated that you can have alot of variety within the dog kind, if as you say selective breeding, were do you see evoloution in there mate?

 

Changing a population genetically through environmental selection IS evolution. And you implied creation when you mentioned Noah.

 

You did not 'merely state' there is a lot of variety within dog kind. You said "Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark", which is completely wrong. You've made a very poor analysis of the experiments results.

 

What it is a great example of is how a species changes genetically through domestication. Evolution through selective breeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark, big variety within the DOG kind ( micro evoloution) as he calls it, in a short space of time, good experiment! :-)

LOL no just the opposite.........................it demonstrates evolution :thumbs:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

You say evoloution i say variety, thats a million miles from darwinisam, molecules to man,,,an i didnt mention creation,,, i merely stated that you can have alot of variety within the dog kind, if as you say selective breeding, were do you see evoloution in there mate?

Changing a population genetically through environmental selection IS evolution. And you implied creation when you mentioned Noah.

 

You did not 'merely state' there is a lot of variety within dog kind. You said "Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark", which is completely wrong. You've made a very poor analysis of the experiments results.

 

What it is a great example of is how a species changes genetically through domestication. Evolution through selective breeding.

Ok so you call it evoloution, i call it variety, so we agree its not darwinism, molecules to man, agreed, its a genetic change of colour an traits, but its still a DOG, :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark, big variety within the DOG kind ( micro evoloution) as he calls it, in a short space of time, good experiment! :-)

LOL no just the opposite.........................it demonstrates evolution :thumbs:

You call it evoloution, i call it variety within the kind, definatley not darwinism, or molecules to man, :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Ok so you call it evoloution, i call it variety, so we agree its not darwinism, molecules to man, agreed, its a genetic change of colour an traits, but its still a DOG, :-)

 

No, it's a fox...... :D

Fox, dog, call it what you want, experiments showed variety, in the kind, in a short time, :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great example of how, all the dogs in the world came from a common DOG ancestor of noahs ark, big variety within the DOG kind ( micro evoloution) as he calls it, in a short space of time, good experiment! :-)

You are hilarious sometimes!! Noah's Ark ???

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...