Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A few from this week with the 300mm f4, quite a distance away though..          

Ha ha .......I dare not let you see the pics of our last day out. You'd get too excited! I've not got them here anyway..... don't keep any photos at my house...   Here's one I took earlier........

great shots ...there not easy as the camera trys to focus on the grass in front of the hare heres a nice sharp bean plant with a hare behind it

Posted Images

I ran over mine with my car, paid just over £1000 for new one, with the insurance money of course..my old one cost £800 off ebay,

 

post-97768-0-49891100-1427815857.png

 

But I did have an old ED version, still sharp, but dosnt take the TC

 

post-97768-0-31025600-1427816289.png

Edited by Omanyra
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Why you do that lol testing strength

Total accident, forgot it was next to the back wheel, still attached to my d300 both knacked....:-(

Claimed on my house insurance no problems :-)

I take it you did'nt replace the D300? Edited by Marmite
Link to post
Share on other sites

Question for you with experience of using both models.

Being that they share the same sensor and with equal good light/conditions and matching focal lengths was there difference in picture quality?,in reality there should'nt be in ideal light should there?

Edited by Marmite
Link to post
Share on other sites

Same sensor ????
The d700 is full frame the d300 is crop señor
Yes they have the same megapixels but not the same sensor, the d700 has the same sensor as the d3
The physical size of the pixels are larger on the d700 hence it's low light capabilities
I shoot at times In low light with iso settings of 6400 sometimes more, I could never do that with the d300
The d300 is a good camera, if you have the light

Back to your question..At iso 400 there is little difference in image quality
Above that the d700 leaves the d300 and most other cameras for dead

Hope this helps

 

a bit on my site that might be helpful;

 

http://billdoherty.co.uk/section688181_257734.html

Edited by Omanyra
Link to post
Share on other sites

Same sensor ????

The d700 is full frame the d300 is crop señor

Yes they have the same megapixels but not the same sensor, the d700 has the same sensor as the d3

The physical size of the pixels are larger on the d700 hence it's low light capabilities

I shoot at times In low light with iso settings of 6400 sometimes more, I could never do that with the d300

The d300 is a good camera, if you have the light

 

Back to your question..At iso 400 there is little difference in image quality

Above that the d700 leaves the d300 and most other cameras for dead

 

Hope this helps

same story with the 5Dmkiii and the 7D in the canon range

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Same sensor ????

The d700 is full frame the d300 is crop señor

Yes they have the same megapixels but not the same sensor, the d700 has the same sensor as the d3

The physical size of the pixels are larger on the d700 hence it's low light capabilities

I shoot at times In low light with iso settings of 6400 sometimes more, I could never do that with the d300

The d300 is a good camera, if you have the light

 

Back to your question..At iso 400 there is little difference in image quality

Above that the d700 leaves the d300 and most other cameras for dead

 

Hope this helps

same story with the 5Dmkiii and the 7D in the canon range

 

Probably Paulus, but Im not up with canon gear

A friend of mine came to photograph ospreys with me with his 7D and the images were poor because of the high iso we needed to use, early morning, low light

He bought another camera Im sure it was the 5D for the next time he went..

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Same sensor ????

The d700 is full frame the d300 is crop señor

Yes they have the same megapixels but not the same sensor, the d700 has the same sensor as the d3

The physical size of the pixels are larger on the d700 hence it's low light capabilities

I shoot at times In low light with iso settings of 6400 sometimes more, I could never do that with the d300

The d300 is a good camera, if you have the light

 

Back to your question..At iso 400 there is little difference in image quality

Above that the d700 leaves the d300 and most other cameras for dead

 

Hope this helps

same story with the 5Dmkiii and the 7D in the canon range

 

Probably Paulus, but Im not up with canon gear

A friend of mine came to photograph ospreys with me with his 7D and the images were poor because of the high iso we needed to use, early morning, low light

He bought another camera Im sure it was the 5D for the next time he went..

 

i have had both and the only advantage i can see with the 7D other than cost is the the crop sensor but for me the 5d wins hands down, not to sure if the replacement 7dmk2 is any better but with the old 7d anything other than good light and you were struggling, wait for JD............................................Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...